World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
6708
World Ranking
6270
National Ranking
26

Andrew Harkin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Harkin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 155 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andrew Harkin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Harkin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The immune theory of psychiatric diseases: a key role for activated microglia and circulating monocytes.

    Wouter Beumer;Sinead M. Gibney;Roosmarijn C. Drexhage;Lorena Pont-Lezica

  • Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors have antidepressant-like properties in mice. 1. Acute treatments are active in the forced swim test.

    Andrew J Harkin;Karen H Bruce;Brandy Craft;Ian A Paul

  • Induction of indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase and kynurenine 3-monooxygenase in rat brain following a systemic inflammatory challenge: A role for IFN-γ?

    Thomas J. Connor;Neasa Starr;Joan B. O'Sullivan;Andrew Harkin

  • Poly I:C-induced activation of the immune response is accompanied by depression and anxiety-like behaviours, kynurenine pathway activation and reduced BDNF expression.

    Sinead M. Gibney;Barry McGuinness;Christine Prendergast;Andrew Harkin

  • Ketamine elicits sustained antidepressant-like activity via a serotonin-dependent mechanism.

    Valentina Gigliucci;Grainne O’Dowd;Sheena Casey;Danielle Egan

  • Gut-brain actions underlying comorbid anxiety and depression associated with inflammatory bowel disease.

    Áine Abautret-Daly;Elaine Dempsey;Adolfo Parra-Blanco;Carlos Medina

  • DNA methylation differences at the glucocorticoid receptor gene in depression are related to functional alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and to early life emotional abuse

    Chloё Farrell;Kelly Doolin;Niamh O’ Leary;Chaitra Jairaj

  • Serotonergic mediation of the antidepressant-like effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors

    A Harkin;T.J Connor;M Walsh;N St John

  • Stress-related regulation of the kynurenine pathway: Relevance to neuropsychiatric and degenerative disorders

    Katherine O'Farrell;Andrew Harkin

  • Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors limit neuroinflammation in rat cortex following a systemic inflammatory challenge: implications for depression and neurodegeneration.

    Joan B. O'Sullivan;Karen M. Ryan;Niamh M. Curtin;Andrew Harkin

  • Activity and onset of action of reboxetine and effect of combination with sertraline in an animal model of depression

    Andrew Harkin;John P Kelly;Mairead McNamara;Thomas J Connor

  • Effect of subchronic antidepressant treatments on behavioral, neurochemical, and endocrine changes in the forced-swim test.

    Thomas J. Connor;Padraig Kelliher;Yan Shen;Andrew Harkin

  • Acute stress suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β independent of a catecholamine-driven increase in IL-10 production

    Thomas J. Connor;Charlene Brewer;John P. Kelly;Andrew Harkin

  • A review of the relevance and validity of olfactory bulbectomy as a model of depression

    Andrew Harkin;John P Kelly;Brian E Leonard

  • Varying responses to the rat forced-swim test under diurnal and nocturnal conditions

    Padraig Kelliher;Thomas J Connor;Andrew Harkin;Connie Sanchez

  • Tryptophan depletion in depressed patients occurs independent of kynurenine pathway activation

    Martina M. Hughes;Angela Carballedo;Declan M. McLoughlin;Francesco Amico

  • Inhibition of stress-induced hepatic tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase exhibits antidepressant activity in an animal model of depressive behaviour.

    Sinead M Gibney;Eimear M Fagan;Ann-Marie Waldron;Jordan O'Byrne

  • Olfactory bulbectomy in mice induces alterations in exploratory behavior.

    M. Zueger;A. Urani;S. Chourbaji;C. Zacher

  • C-reactive protein predicts fatigue independently of depression in breast cancer patients prior to chemotherapy.

    Maria M. Pertl;David Hevey;Noreen T. Boyle;Martina M. Hughes

  • Olfactory Bulbectomy Provokes a Suppression of Interleukin-1β and Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Production in Response to an in vivo Challenge with Lipopolysaccharide: Effect of Chronic Desipramine Treatment

    Thomas J. Connor;Andrew Harkin;John P. Kelly;Brian E. Leonard

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian E. Leonard
Brian E. Leonard University of Galway
Thomas Frodl
Thomas Frodl Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Hemmo A. Drexhage
Hemmo A. Drexhage Erasmus University Rotterdam
John F. Cryan
John F. Cryan University College Cork
Ronan M. Conroy
Ronan M. Conroy Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Linda Booij
Linda Booij Concordia University
Moshe Szyf
Moshe Szyf McGill University
John J. O'Connor
John J. O'Connor University College Dublin
Brian Hallahan
Brian Hallahan University of Galway
Colm Cunningham
Colm Cunningham Trinity College Dublin

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Harkin

Recently Published Articles