World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 44 7157 6592 3098 2793 100 7718

Andrew Escayg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Escayg between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Escayg published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 5 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1997 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Escayg: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 6
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 5
2011 3
2012 2
2013 5
2014 6
2015 3
2016 6
2017 9
2018 6
2019 6
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 2
2024 1
2025 4
Total 103
Download as CSV

Andrew Escayg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Escayg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 100
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Escayg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Escayg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478 44
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew Escayg is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research primarily revolves around neuroscience with significant intersections in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine.

The main fields of study addressed in their work include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these broad areas, Escayg's research focuses on various subfields such as:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Neurology

The subjects covered in their publications span multiple key topics related to brain function and disorders, specifically:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Epilepsy Research and Treatment
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Andrew Escayg has published in several scientific venues, commonly contributing to:

  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Neurobiology of Disease
  • Experimental Neurology
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Neuropharmacology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Escayg include:

  • Jennifer C. Wong
  • Lindsey Shapiro
  • Jacquelyn T. Thelin
  • Martin J. D'Souza
  • Kevin S. Murnane

Selected recent publications illustrate the focus of Escayg's research:

  • Extracellular vesicles in the treatment of neurological disorders, 2021, Neurobiology of Disease
  • Nanoparticle encapsulated oxytocin increases resistance to induced seizures and restores social behavior in Scn1a-derived epilepsy, 2020, Neurobiology of Disease
  • Mice lacking full length Adgrb1 (Bai1) exhibit social deficits, increased seizure susceptibility, and altered brain development, 2022, Experimental Neurology
  • Autistic-like behavior, spontaneous seizures, and increased neuronal excitability in a Scn8a mouse model, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid 2 receptor confers seizure resistance in mice, 2021, Neuropharmacology

Best Publications

  • Mutations of SCN1A, encoding a neuronal sodium channel, in two families with GEFS+2.

    Andrew Escayg;Bryan T. MacDonald;Miriam H. Meisler;Stéphanie Baulac

  • Coding and Noncoding Variation of the Human Calcium-Channel β4-Subunit Gene CACNB4 in Patients with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy and Episodic Ataxia

    Andrew Escayg;Michel De Waard;David D. Lee;Delphine Bichet

  • Sodium channel SCN1A and epilepsy: mutations and mechanisms.

    Andrew Escayg;Alan L. Goldin

  • A novel SCN1A mutation associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus--and prevalence of variants in patients with epilepsy.

    Andrew Escayg;Armin Heils;Bryan T. MacDonald;Karsten Haug

  • Sodium channels SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A in familial autism.

    L A Weiss;A Escayg;J A Kearney;M Trudeau

  • Altered Function of the SCN1A Voltage-gated Sodium Channel Leads to γ-Aminobutyric Acid-ergic (GABAergic) Interneuron Abnormalities

    Melinda S. Martin;Karoni Dutt;Ligia Assumpção Papale;Ligia Assumpção Papale;Celine M. Dube

  • The voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a is a genetic modifier of severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy.

    Melinda S. Martin;Bin Tang;Ligia A. Papale;Frank H. Yu

  • Functional Effects of Two Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Mutations That Cause Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus Type 2

    Jay Spampanato;Andrew Escayg;Miriam H. Meisler;Alan L. Goldin

  • A Novel Epilepsy Mutation in the Sodium Channel SCN1A Identifies a Cytoplasmic Domain for β Subunit Interaction

    J. Spampanato;J. A. Kearney;G. de Haan;D. P. McEwen

  • Identification of epilepsy genes in human and mouse.

    Miriam H. Meisler;Jennifer Kearney;Ruth Ottman;Andrew Escayg

  • Impaired Action Potential Initiation in GABAergic Interneurons Causes Hyperexcitable Networks in an Epileptic Mouse Model Carrying a Human NaV1.1 Mutation

    Ulrike B.S. Hedrich;Camille Liautard;Daniel Kirschenbaum;Martin Pofahl

  • Preferential inactivation of Scn1a in parvalbumin interneurons increases seizure susceptibility.

    Stacey B. Dutton;Christopher D. Makinson;Ligia A. Papale;Anupama Shankar

  • Heterozygous mutations of the voltage-gated sodium channel SCN8A are associated with spike-wave discharges and absence epilepsy in mice

    Ligia Assumpção Papale;Barbara Beyer;Julie M. Jones;Lisa M. Sharkey

  • Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus type 2 mutation W1204R alters voltage-dependent gating of Nav1.1 sodium channels

    J. Spampanato;A. Escayg;M.H. Meisler;A.L. Goldin

  • An Epilepsy Mutation in the Sodium Channel SCN1A That Decreases Channel Excitability

    Arthur J. Barela;Salina P. Waddy;Jay G. Lickfett;Jessica Hunter

  • Regulation of Thalamic and Cortical Network Synchrony by Scn8a.

    Christopher D. Makinson;Brian S. Tanaka;Jordan M. Sorokin;Jennifer C. Wong

  • A BAC transgenic mouse model reveals neuron subtype-specific effects of a Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus (GEFS+) mutation

    Bin Tang;Karoni Dutt;Ligia Papale;Raffaella Rusconi

  • Migrainous vertigo: mutation analysis of the candidate genes CACNA1A, ATP1A2, SCN1A, and CACNB4.

    Michael Von Brevern;Nga Ta;Anupama Shankar;Anna Wiste

  • Diagnostic Yield From 339 Epilepsy Patients Screened on a Clinical Gene Panel

    Kameryn M. Butler;Cristina da Silva;John J. Alexander;Madhuri Hegde

  • Neuronal voltage-gated ion channels are genetic modifiers of generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus.

    Nicole A. Hawkins;Melinda S. Martin;Wayne N. Frankel;Jennifer A. Kearney

  • De novo variants in GABRA2 and GABRA5 alter receptor function and contribute to early-onset epilepsy

    Kameryn M Butler;Olivia A Moody;Elisabeth Schuler;Jason Coryell

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan L. Goldin
Alan L. Goldin University of California, Irvine
Miriam H. Meisler
Miriam H. Meisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer A. Kearney
Jennifer A. Kearney Northwestern University
Sergio Tufik
Sergio Tufik Federal University of Sao Paulo
Thomas Sander
Thomas Sander University of Cologne
Holger Lerche
Holger Lerche University of Tübingen
Heinz Beck
Heinz Beck University of Bonn
Ulrich Stephani
Ulrich Stephani Kiel University
Wayne N. Frankel
Wayne N. Frankel Columbia University
Tallie Z. Baram
Tallie Z. Baram University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are a wide range of related degree options and career pathways available online. For those looking to earn a degree quickly, accelerated degree programs can help you complete your studies faster and start your career sooner.

Choosing the right major is important—not just for knowledge, but also for job prospects and future earnings. Many fields related to Neuroscience appear on the lists of the top 10 best bachelor degrees as well as the most lucrative degrees. This means you can align your passion for the brain and nervous system with a solid career outlook.

Financial accessibility is another key factor. Consider enrolling in an online college that accepts fafsa to reduce tuition costs and access federal student aid. By researching your options, you can find a flexible, affordable path into Neuroscience or related fields—all while maximizing your earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Escayg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles