World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
41
Citations
9847
World Ranking
4905
National Ranking
2189

Amy Lansky publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Lansky sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 82 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Amy Lansky D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Lansky sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006-2009.

    Joseph Prejean;Ruiguang Song;Angela Hernandez;Rebecca Ziebell

  • Estimating per-act HIV transmission risk: a systematic review.

    Pragna Patel;Craig B. Borkowf;John T. Brooks;Arielle Lasry

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission at Each Step of the Care Continuum in the United States

    Jacek Skarbinski;Eli Rosenberg;Gabriela Paz-Bailey;H. Irene Hall

  • Surveillance of HIV risk and prevention behaviors of men who have sex with men--a national application of venue-based, time-space sampling.

    Duncan A. MacKellar;Kathleen M. Gallagher;Teresa Finlayson;Travis Sanchez

  • Estimating the Population Size of Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States to Obtain HIV and Syphilis Rates

    David W Purcell;Christopher H Johnson;Amy Lansky;Joseph Prejean

  • Lifetime Risk of a Diagnosis of HIV Infection in the United States

    Kristen L. Hess;Xiaohong Hu;Amy Lansky;Jonathan Mermin

  • Behavioral surveillance among people at risk for HIV infection in the U.S.: the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System.

    Kathleen M. Gallagher;Patrick S. Sullivan;Amy Lansky;Ida M. Onorato

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors--United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005.

    Travis Sanchez;Teresa Finlayson;Amy Drake;Stephanie Behel

  • Interim guidance: preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in men who have sex with men

    Dawn K. Smith;Robert M. Grant;Paul J. Weidle;Amy Lansky

  • HIV testing within at-risk populations in the United States and the reasons for seeking or avoiding HIV testing.

    Scott E Kellerman;J Stan Lehman;Amy Lansky;Mark R Stevens

  • Estimating the number of persons who inject drugs in the united states by meta-analysis to calculate national rates of HIV and hepatitis C virus infections.

    Amy Lansky;Teresa Finlayson;Christopher Johnson;Deborah Holtzman

  • Recommendations for HIV Screening of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men — United States, 2017

    Unknown

  • Validation of measures of condom and other contraceptive use among women at high risk for HIV infection and unintended pregnancy.

    Christine Galavotti;Rebecca J. Cabral;Amy Lansky;Diane M. Grimley

  • Interim guidance for clinicians considering the use of preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in heterosexually active adults

    Dawn K. Smith;Michael C. Thigpen;Steven R. Nesheim;Margaret A. Lampe

  • Developing an HIV Behavioral Surveillance System for Injecting Drug Users: The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System:

    Amy Lansky;Abu S. Abdul-Quader;Melissa Cribbin;Tricia Hall

  • Failure to return for HIV test results among persons at high risk for HIV infection: results from a multistate interview project.

    Patrick S. Sullivan;Amy Lansky;Amy Drake

  • Reasons for not HIV testing, testing intentions, and potential use of an over-the-counter rapid HIV test in an internet sample of men who have sex with men who have never tested for HIV.

    Duncan A. MacKellar;Su-I Hou;Christopher C. Whalen;Karen Samuelsen

  • Trends in Diagnoses of HIV Infection in the United States, 2002-2011

    Anna Satcher Johnson;H. Irene Hall;Xiaohong Hu;Amy Lansky

  • Update to Interim guidance for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the prevention of HIV infection : PrEP for injecting drug users

    Dawn K. Smith;Michael Martin;Amy Lansky;Jonathan Mermin

  • Decreases in COVID-19 Cases, Emergency Department Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Deaths Among Older Adults Following the Introduction of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, September 6, 2020-May 1, 2021.

    Athalia Christie;S. Jane Henley;Linda Mattocks;Robyn Fernando

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles