World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alexey Kuvshinov

Alexey Kuvshinov

Alexey Kuvshinov publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexey Kuvshinov sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Alexey Kuvshinov D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexey Kuvshinov sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexey Kuvshinov is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, particularly focusing on Geophysics and related subfields. Their research portfolio includes a substantial number of publications addressing geophysical and geoelectrical methods, geomagnetism, paleomagnetism, and earthquake detection and analysis.

They have published in several journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Earth Planets and Space
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Space Weather
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Kuvshinov's notable recent papers include:

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation, 2021, Earth Planets and Space
  • Probing 3-D electrical conductivity of the mantle using 6 years of Swarm, CryoSat-2 and observatory magnetic data and exploiting matrix Q-responses approach, 2021, Earth Planets and Space
  • Evidence for terrane boundaries and suture zones across Southern Mongolia detected with a 2-dimensional magnetotelluric transect, 2020, Earth Planets and Space
  • Compaction-Driven Fluid Localization as an Explanation for Lower Crustal Electrical Conductors in an Intracontinental Setting, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Imaging the Whole-Lithosphere Architecture of a Mineral System-Geophysical Signatures of the Sources and Pathways of Ore-Forming Fluids, 2022, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

Their research topics cover a range of geoscience areas, including:

  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements

Alexey Kuvshinov collaborates frequently with several co-authors in their field. The most frequent collaborators include:

  • Mikhail Kruglyakov
  • Alexander Grayver
  • Rafael Rigaud
  • Matthew J. Comeau
  • Michael Becken

Their main fields of study comprise Earth and Planetary Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on geophysics within Earth sciences and molecular biology as a secondary area.

Best Publications

  • International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation

    P. Alken;P. Alken;E. Thébault;C. D. Beggan;H. Amit

  • The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility (SCARF) and Swarm data products

    Nils Olsen;Eigil Friis-Christensen;Rune Floberghagen;Patrick Alken;Patrick Alken

  • The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly

    Christopher C. Finlay;Clemens Kloss;Nils Olsen;Magnus D. Hammer

  • CM5, a Pre-Swarm Comprehensive Geomagnetic Field Model Derived from Over 12 Yr of CHAMP, Orsted, SAC-C and Observatory Data

    Terence J. Sabaka;Nils Olsen;Robert H. Tyler;Robert H. Tyler;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Earth's lithospheric magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements

    Stefan Maus;Martin Rother;Kumar Hemant;Claudia Stolle

  • 3-D Global Induction in the Oceans and Solid Earth: Recent Progress in Modeling Magnetic and Electric Fields from Sources of Magnetospheric, Ionospheric and Oceanic Origin

    Unknown

  • Ocean circulation generated magnetic signals

    C. Manoj;A. Kuvshinov;S. Maus;H. Lühr

  • Joint inversion of satellite-detected tidal and magnetospheric signals constrains electrical conductivity and water content of the upper mantle and transition zone

    Alexander V. Grayver;Federico D. Munch;Alexei V. Kuvshinov;Amir Khan

  • 3-D analysis and interpretation of magnetotelluric data from the Aluto-Langano geothermal field, Ethiopia

    Friedemann Samrock;Alexey Kuvshinov;Jenneke Bakker;Andrew Jackson

  • A new model of Earth's radial conductivity structure derived from over 10 yr of satellite and observatory magnetic data

    Christoph Püthe;Alexey Kuvshinov;Amir Khan;Nils Olsen

  • Global 3‐D imaging of mantle conductivity based on inversion of observatory C‐responses—II. Data analysis and results

    Alexey Semenov;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Global 3-D imaging of mantle electrical conductivity based on inversion of observatory C-responses - I. An approach and its verification

    Alexey Kuvshinov;Alexey Semenov

  • Evidence for fluid and melt generation in response to an asthenospheric upwelling beneath the Hangai Dome, Mongolia

    Matthew J. Comeau;Johannes S. Käufl;Michael Becken;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Modeling the ocean effect of geomagnetic storms

    N. Olsen;A. Kuvshinov

  • Satellite tidal magnetic signals constrain oceanic lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary.

    Alexander V. Grayver;Neesha R. Schnepf;Alexey V. Kuvshinov;Terence J. Sabaka

  • Probing 3-D electrical conductivity of the mantle using 6 years of Swarm, CryoSat-2 and observatory magnetic data and exploiting matrix Q-responses approach

    Unknown

  • Compilation of 3D global conductivity model of the Earth for space weather applications

    Dmitry Alekseev;Alexey Kuvshinov;Nikolay Palshin

  • Magnetotelluric multiscale 3-D inversion reveals crustal and upper mantle structure beneath the Hangai and Gobi-Altai region in Mongolia

    Johannes Sebastian Käufl;Alexander Grayver;Matthew J. Comeau;Alexey V. Kuvshinov

  • Deep Electromagnetic Studies from Land, Sea, and Space: Progress Status in the Past 10 Years

    A. V. Kuvshinov

  • Mapping 3-D mantle electrical conductivity from space: a new 3-D inversion scheme based on analysis of matrix Q-responses

    Christoph Püthe;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Three-dimensional electrical conductivity structure beneath Australia from inversion of geomagnetic observatory data: evidence for lateral variations in transition-zone temperature, water content and melt

    Takao Koyama;Amir Khan;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Evidence for terrane boundaries and suture zones across Southern Mongolia detected with a 2-dimensional magnetotelluric transect

    Matthew J. Comeau;Michael Becken;Johannes S. Käufl;Alexander V. Grayver

  • Tidal signals in ocean-bottom magnetic measurements of the Northwestern Pacific: observation versus prediction

    N. R. Schnepf;C. Manoj;C. Manoj;A. Kuvshinov;H. Toh

  • Probing 3-D electrical conductivity of the mantle using 6 years of Swarm, CryoSat-2 and observatory magnetic data and exploiting matrix Q-responses approach

    Alexey Kuvshinov;Alexander Grayver;Lars Tøffner-Clausen;Nils Olsen

  • Does the South Atlantic Anomaly influence the ionospheric Sq current system? Inferences from analysis of ground-based magnetic data

    Stephan Koch;Alexey Kuvshinov

  • Satellite Tidal Magnetic Signals Constrain Oceanic Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary Earth Tomography with Tidal Magnetic Signals

    Alexander V. Grayver;Neesha R. Schnepf;Alexey V. Kuvshinov;Terence J. Sabaka

Frequent Co-Authors

Nils Olsen
Nils Olsen Technical University of Denmark
Terence J. Sabaka
Terence J. Sabaka Goddard Space Flight Center
Amir Khan
Amir Khan ETH Zurich
Claudia Stolle
Claudia Stolle Leibniz Institute of Atmospheric Physics at the Rostock University
Gauthier Hulot
Gauthier Hulot Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Antti Pulkkinen
Antti Pulkkinen Goddard Space Flight Center
Christopher C. Finlay
Christopher C. Finlay Technical University of Denmark
Martin O. Saar
Martin O. Saar ETH Zurich
Stephan W. Koch
Stephan W. Koch Philipp University of Marburg
Stefan Maus
Stefan Maus University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields and career opportunities. Many students complement their Earth Science expertise with skills from other disciplines, enhancing their professional versatility and employability.

For creative professionals interested in visual storytelling, exploring programs like the best online photography degree programs for veterans can provide a unique perspective on environmental documentation and geographic phenomena.

Language skills are also valuable in global environmental work. Pursuing courses such as the best online Spanish degree programs for veterans or affordable options listed in spanish online degree guides can improve communication in international ecological projects.

Additionally, those interested in combining science with creativity might consider an online MFA creative writing degree. This can enable effective environmental advocacy through compelling narratives and reports.

Exploring these related degrees helps Earth Science students build a robust skill set that is adaptable across multiple, rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Alexey Kuvshinov

Trending Scientists