World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alberto d’Onofrio

Alberto d’Onofrio

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
39
Citations
6176
World Ranking
2212
National Ranking
65

Alberto d’Onofrio publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto d’Onofrio sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 148 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Alberto d’Onofrio D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alberto d’Onofrio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Stability properties of pulse vaccination strategy in SEIR epidemic model.

    Alberto d'Onofrio

  • Modeling the interplay between human behavior and the spread of infectious diseases

    Piero Manfredi;Alberto D'Onofrio

  • A general framework for modeling tumor-immune system competition and immunotherapy: Mathematical analysis and biomedical inferences

    Alberto d’Onofrio

  • Vaccinating behaviour, information, and the dynamics of SIR vaccine preventable diseases

    Alberto d’Onofrio;Piero Manfredi;Ernesto Salinelli

  • Global stability of an SIR epidemic model with information dependent vaccination

    Bruno Buonomo;Alberto d’Onofrio;Deborah Lacitignola

  • On pulse vaccination strategy in the SIR epidemic model with vertical transmission

    Alberto d’Onofrio

  • Tumour eradication by antiangiogenic therapy: analysis and extensions of the model by Hahnfeldt et al. (1999).

    Alberto d’Onofrio;Alberto Gandolfi

  • On optimal delivery of combination therapy for tumors

    Alberto d’Onofrio;Urszula Ledzewicz;Helmut Maurer;Heinz Schättler

  • Information-related changes in contact patterns may trigger oscillations in the endemic prevalence of infectious diseases

    A Donofrio;Pietro Angelo Manfredo Francesco Manfredi

  • Pulse vaccination strategy in the sir epidemic model: Global asymptotic stable eradication in presence of vaccine failures

    A. D'Onofrio

  • Bounded Noises in Physics, Biology, and Engineering

    Alberto D'Onofrio

  • Delay-induced oscillatory dynamics of tumour-immune system interaction

    Alberto D'Onofrio;Francesca Gatti;Paola Cerrai;Luca Freschi

  • Metamodeling tumor-immune system interaction, tumor evasion and immunotherapy

    Alberto D'Onofrio

  • A note on the global behaviour of the network-based SIS epidemic model

    Alberto d’Onofrio

  • Bounded-noise-induced transitions in a tumor-immune system interplay.

    Alberto d'Onofrio

  • The impact of vaccine side effects on the natural history of immunization programmes: An imitation-game approach

    Alberto d'Onofrio;Piero Manfredi;Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti

  • TUMOR-IMMUNE SYSTEM INTERACTION: MODELING THE TUMOR-STIMULATED PROLIFERATION OF EFFECTORS AND IMMUNOTHERAPY

    A. D'onofrio

  • A family of models of angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis anti-cancer therapy.

    Alberto D'Onofrio;Alberto Gandolfi

  • The Interplay of Public Intervention and Private Choices in Determining the Outcome of Vaccination Programmes

    Alberto d’Onofrio;Piero Manfredi;Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti

  • Tumour suppression by immune system through stochastic oscillations.

    Giulio Caravagna;Alberto d’Onofrio;Paolo Milazzo;Roberto Barbuti

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto Orecchia
Roberto Orecchia European Institute of Oncology
Giancarlo Mauri
Giancarlo Mauri University of Milano-Bicocca
Peter Boyle
Peter Boyle University of Edinburgh
Piero Poletti
Piero Poletti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Heinz Schättler
Heinz Schättler Washington University in St. Louis
Chris Robertson
Chris Robertson University of Strathclyde
David Zaridze
David Zaridze Russian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin
Marcel Salathé
Marcel Salathé École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Arthur L. Burnett
Arthur L. Burnett Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ian Tomlinson
Ian Tomlinson University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance skill sets. Many professionals pursuing advanced education look for flexible options, making online programs a popular choice.

If you're considering management roles with a quantitative focus, you might wonder, what MBA programs can I get into. Understanding program difficulty and admission requirements can help you find the right fit.

For those seeking a balance between quality and accessibility, the easiest MBA program options offer streamlined curricula without compromising foundational business knowledge. These programs are ideal for individuals aiming to enhance their leadership skills quickly.

On the other hand, if you desire an advanced focus within business administration, exploring the best 1 year DBA program online can maximize your educational investment in a short timeframe, preparing you for executive roles.

Finally, for math enthusiasts leaning towards financial analytics, the cheapest masters in finance provides a practical and cost-effective path to mastering finance principles and quantitative methods relevant in today’s market.

Best Scientists Citing Alberto d’Onofrio

Recently Published Articles