World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4523
World Ranking
3183
National Ranking
108

Piero Poletti publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero Poletti sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Piero Poletti D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero Poletti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Spread of Zika virus in the Americas.

    Qian Zhang;Kaiyuan Sun;Matteo Chinazzi;Ana Pastore y Piontti

  • Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases and estimates of the reproductive numbers 1 month into the epidemic, Italy, 28 January to 31 March 2020.

    Flavia Riccardo;Marco Ajelli;Xanthi D Andrianou;Xanthi D Andrianou;Antonino Bella

  • The early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, Italy

    Unknown

  • The Effect of Risk Perception on the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Dynamics

    Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti;Marco Ajelli;Stefano Merler

  • Spontaneous behavioural changes in response to epidemics

    Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti;Bruno Caprile;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli;Andrea Pugliese

  • Association of Age With Likelihood of Developing Symptoms and Critical Disease Among Close Contacts Exposed to Patients With Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Italy.

    Piero Poletti;Marcello Tirani;Danilo Cereda;Filippo Trentini

  • Transmission potential of chikungunya virus and control measures: the case of Italy.

    Piero Poletti;Gianni Messeri;Marco Ajelli;Roberto Vallorani

  • Risk perception and effectiveness of uncoordinated behavioral responses in an emerging epidemic.

    Piero Poletti;Marco Ajelli;Stefano Merler

  • Social Contact Structures and Time Use Patterns in the Manicaland Province of Zimbabwe.

    Alessia Melegaro;Emanuele Del Fava;Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti;Stefano Merler

  • Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases in Italy and estimates of the reproductive numbers one month into the epidemic

    Flavia Riccardo;Marco Ajelli;Xanthi Andrianou;Antonino Bella

  • Despite vaccination, China needs non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent widespread outbreaks of COVID-19 in 2021.

    Juan Yang;Valentina Marziano;Xiaowei Deng;Giorgio Guzzetta

  • The early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Lombardy, Italy.

    Danilo Cereda;Mattia Manica;Marcello Tirani;Francesca Rovida

  • The effect of COVID-19 vaccination in Italy and perspectives for living with the virus

    Unknown

  • The impact of vaccine side effects on the natural history of immunization programmes: An imitation-game approach

    Alberto d'Onofrio;Piero Manfredi;Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti

  • The Interplay of Public Intervention and Private Choices in Determining the Outcome of Vaccination Programmes

    Alberto d’Onofrio;Piero Manfredi;Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti

  • Retrospective analysis of the Italian exit strategy from COVID-19 lockdown.

    Valentina Marziano;Giorgio Guzzetta;Bruna Maria Rondinone;Fabio Boccuni

  • Impact of a Nationwide Lockdown on SARS-CoV-2 Transmissibility, Italy.

    Giorgio Guzzetta;Flavia Riccardo;Valentina Marziano;Piero Poletti

  • Transmission dynamics of the ongoing chikungunya outbreak in Central Italy: from coastal areas to the metropolitan city of Rome, summer 2017.

    Mattia Manica;Giorgio Guzzetta;Piero Poletti;Federico Filipponi

  • Seroprevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

    Piero Poletti;Marcello Tirani;Danilo Cereda;Giorgio Guzzetta

  • Age-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality ratio and associated risk factors, Italy, February to April 2020.

    Piero Poletti;Marcello Tirani;Danilo Cereda;Filippo Trentini

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Merler
Stefano Merler Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Patrizio Pezzotti
Patrizio Pezzotti Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Giovanni Rezza
Giovanni Rezza Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Alessandro Vespignani
Alessandro Vespignani Northeastern University
Annapaola Rizzoli
Annapaola Rizzoli Fondazione Edmund Mach
M. Elizabeth Halloran
M. Elizabeth Halloran Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Cécile Viboud
Cécile Viboud National Institutes of Health
Hongjie Yu
Hongjie Yu Fudan University
Ira M. Longini
Ira M. Longini University of Florida
Gioia Capelli
Gioia Capelli Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can unlock diverse career opportunities. Many professionals consider advancing their education with programs like the shortest online MBA programs, which offer a flexible and time-efficient way to gain business acumen alongside technical skills.

In addition, combining a mathematical background with a masters in marketing can open pathways into data-driven marketing roles that are high in demand and well-compensated.

For those seeking accelerated study options, 1 year MBA programs in USA provide intensive coursework designed to prepare graduates for leadership roles in various industries within a short timeframe.

Flexibility in education is further enhanced by exploring programs where can you transfer MBA programs credits, allowing students to tailor their educational journey based on prior learning and experience.

Overall, these related degree options complement a Mathematics foundation, equipping graduates with versatile skills to thrive in competitive, interdisciplinary career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Piero Poletti

Recently Published Articles