World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
51
Citations
15802
World Ranking
998
National Ranking
25

Stefano Merler publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Merler sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 172 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Stefano Merler D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Merler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

    Matteo Chinazzi;Jessica T. Davis;Marco Ajelli;Corrado Gioannini

  • Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China.

    Juanjuan Zhang;Maria Litvinova;Yuxia Liang;Yan Wang

  • Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19.

    Alberto Aleta;David Martín-Corral;Ana Pastore y Piontti;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli

  • Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study.

    Juanjuan Zhang;Maria Litvinova;Wei Wang;Yan Wang

  • Spread of Zika virus in the Americas.

    Qian Zhang;Kaiyuan Sun;Matteo Chinazzi;Ana Pastore y Piontti

  • Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: agent-based versus structured metapopulation models.

    Marco Ajelli;Bruno Gonçalves;Duygu Balcan;Vittoria Colizza

  • The role of population heterogeneity and human mobility in the spread of pandemic influenza.

    Stefano Merler;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli

  • Spatiotemporal Spread of the 2014 Outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease in Liberia and the Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions: A Computational Modelling Analysis

    Stefano Merler;Marco Ajelli;Laura Fumanelli;Marcelo F C Gomes

  • Measurability of the epidemic reproduction number in data-driven contact networks

    Quan-Hui Liu;Marco Ajelli;Alberto Aleta;Stefano Merler

  • The RAPIDD ebola forecasting challenge: Synthesis and lessons learnt.

    Cécile Viboud;Kaiyuan Sun;Robert Gaffey;Marco Ajelli

  • Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 cases and estimates of the reproductive numbers 1 month into the epidemic, Italy, 28 January to 31 March 2020.

    Flavia Riccardo;Marco Ajelli;Xanthi D Andrianou;Xanthi D Andrianou;Antonino Bella

  • The early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, Italy

    Unknown

  • Inferring the Structure of Social Contacts from Demographic Data in the Analysis of Infectious Diseases Spread

    Laura Fumanelli;Marco Ajelli;Piero Manfredi;Alessandro Vespignani;Alessandro Vespignani

  • Mitigation measures for pandemic influenza in Italy: an individual based model considering different scenarios.

    Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti;Stefano Merler;Caterina Rizzo;Caterina Rizzo;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli

  • The Effect of Risk Perception on the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Influenza Dynamics

    Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti;Marco Ajelli;Stefano Merler

  • Spontaneous behavioural changes in response to epidemics

    Piero Poletti;Piero Poletti;Bruno Caprile;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli;Andrea Pugliese

  • Modeling the impact of social distancing, testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second-wave scenarios of the COVID-19 epidemic

    Alberto Aleta;David Martin-Corral;Ana Pastore y Piontti;Marco Ajelli;Marco Ajelli

  • Association of Age With Likelihood of Developing Symptoms and Critical Disease Among Close Contacts Exposed to Patients With Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Italy.

    Piero Poletti;Marcello Tirani;Danilo Cereda;Filippo Trentini

  • Determinants of the spatiotemporal dynamics of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Europe: implications for real-time modelling.

    Stefano Merler;Marco Ajelli;Andrea Pugliese;Neil M. Ferguson

  • The early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Lombardy, Italy.

    Danilo Cereda;Mattia Manica;Marcello Tirani;Francesca Rovida

Frequent Co-Authors

Piero Poletti
Piero Poletti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Alessandro Vespignani
Alessandro Vespignani Northeastern University
Cesare Furlanello
Cesare Furlanello Fondazione Bruno Kessler
M. Elizabeth Halloran
M. Elizabeth Halloran Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Giuseppe Jurman
Giuseppe Jurman Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Ira M. Longini
Ira M. Longini University of Florida
Cécile Viboud
Cécile Viboud National Institutes of Health
Annapaola Rizzoli
Annapaola Rizzoli Fondazione Edmund Mach
Patrizio Pezzotti
Patrizio Pezzotti Istituto Superiore di Sanità
Hongjie Yu
Hongjie Yu Fudan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in applying mathematical skills in business or research, pursuing an online degree offers flexibility and accessibility. Many students explore options like the easiest online MBA programs to get into, which provide foundational business knowledge while accommodating diverse schedules.

For advanced management expertise, the best 1 year DBA program online stands out as a fast and cost-effective way to deepen leadership and analytical skills relevant to strategic decision-making.

Those aiming to specialize in financial sectors can benefit from affordable education, such as the cheapest online master's in finance, which often incorporate quantitative methods and data analysis integral to mathematics graduates.

Speed is also a factor for many learners, and the fastest online MBA programs enable professionals to upgrade their credentials quickly while leveraging mathematical problem-solving in management contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Stefano Merler

Recently Published Articles