Data Sources for the 4th Edition of Research.com Best Ecology and Evolution Scientists in Mauritius Ranking
The 4th edition of the Research.com Best Ecology and Evolution Scientists in Mauritius Ranking is built upon robust and comprehensive data collection methods. The primary sources for bibliometric data include OpenAlex and CrossRef, which are two of the most authoritative and widely acknowledged databases in the academic community. In addition to these, multiple other reputable data sources were utilized to ensure data comprehensiveness and accuracy. The citation-based metrics underpinning the ranking were devised using bibliometric data collected as of 2024-11-27.
A scientist’s ranking position is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), an indicator that exclusively considers research outputs and citation metrics within a specific scientific discipline. This focused metric allows for an objective evaluation of researchers based solely on their contributions to Ecology and Evolution.
Research Scope and Criteria
For the purpose of this ranking, an extensive assessment of 279,971 scientist profiles covering all academic disciplines was conducted, sourced from a diverse set of bibliometric databases. Within the field of Ecology and Evolution, 1 scientist from Mauritius met the selection criteria.
-
To qualify for the ranking, a scientist was required to have a minimum D-index of 30, with the majority of their major publications situated within Ecology and Evolution.
-
Additional consideration was given to researchers’ awards and notable achievements in Ecology and Evolution.
-
The D-index threshold is dynamically adjusted in increments of 10 according to the estimated number of scholars in each discipline, ensuring that the top 1% of leading experts in each area are included.
-
A proximity of 30% or less between a scientist’s general H-index and D-index was mandated to ensure research specialization within Ecology and Evolution.
Verification and Quality Assurance Practices
The Research.com ranking process recognizes that raw bibliometric data alone is not a definitive measure of scientific impact. Consequently, each profile identified was subjected to rigorous manual verification, ensuring their accuracy by cross-correlation against publications in a wide array of respected and trustworthy sources.
While not directly influencing the ranking, the total number of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings serves as a valuable supplementary indicator of a scientist’s overall contributions to their discipline.
The final ranking positions are determined exclusively via each researcher’s D-index, employing the most up-to-date information derived from OpenAlex and CrossRef, the leading bibliometric databases available to the global research community. We encourage you to learn more about the ranking methodology on our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Agenda
The driving motivation behind creating this ranking is to foster greater visibility and recognition of leading scientific experts. Our mission is to inspire researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers worldwide to engage with the forefront of scientific progress, to understand current trends, and to identify leadership within specific disciplines and geographical regions. By doing so, we aim to provide the wider academic and scientific communities with actionable insights into the global landscape of research excellence.
