The bibliometric data utilized to devise the citation-based metrics for this ranking were collected on January 12, 2026. A scientist’s positioning in the ranking is exclusively determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index). This metric focuses solely on a researcher’s published papers and citation impact within the specific discipline under evaluation — in this case, Business and Management — thereby reflecting their targeted influence and expertise in the subject area.
Scope of Research and Qualification Criteria
The ranking process commenced with a thorough examination of 279,971 scientist profiles aggregated from diverse bibliometric sources spanning all scientific disciplines. Specifically, within the domain of Business and Management, 1,000+ researchers were identified and analyzed in detail.
To qualify for inclusion in the ranking, candidates were required to meet the following criteria:
- A minimum D-index of 30, ensuring a substantive and impactful research footprint within Business and Management.
- A majority of their tier publications must be explicitly categorized within the Business and Management discipline.
- Recognition of awards and notable achievements within the field was also considered as supplementary evidence of standing and contribution.
The D-index threshold to consider top researchers is set as an increment of 10, calibrated relative to the total number of scholars estimated per discipline. This method guarantees inclusion of the top 1% of leading experts in each research area. Furthermore, to maintain discipline-specific focus, a proximity of 30% or less between a scientist’s overall H-index and their D-index was required, ensuring that the evaluated impact aligns closely with their contributions to Business and Management.
Verification and Validation Practices
Recognizing that raw bibliometric data alone cannot serve as an absolute measure of scholarly output, the Research.com team implemented rigorous manual verification procedures. Each scientist profile was carefully cross-examined and validated against publications indexed in a wide array of trustworthy academic sources. This multi-faceted verification enhances the credibility and reliability of the ranking.
While the total number of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings does not directly determine a researcher’s rank, it is valued as an important secondary indicator of scientific contribution within the specific field.
The final positions in the ranking are based exclusively on each researcher's D-index computed from citation data gathered through OpenAlex and CrossRef. These databases were selected for their prominence, comprehensive coverage, and reliability in bibliometric analysis.
For detailed information on the methods and data processing steps involved in the creation of this ranking, readers are encouraged to visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission Behind the Ranking
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Business and Management Scientists in Morocco Ranking embodies our commitment to motivating researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers worldwide to recognize and engage with leading experts across scientific disciplines.
Our goal is to provide a transparent, data-driven framework that highlights who the foremost scientists are in specific fields of study, across different countries, and within leading research institutions. By doing so, we aim to foster collaboration, knowledge dissemination, and informed decision-making within the global scientific community and beyond.
Through meticulous and methodical analysis, this ranking serves not only as a reflection of past achievements but also as an indicator of emerging research trajectories and centers of excellence.
