| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Technology | 899 | 14 | 24 | 9 |
The journal primarily tackles Human factors and ergonomics, Knowledge management, Cognition, Human–computer interaction and Cognitive psychology. It explores topics in Human factors and ergonomics which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Management science, Engineering ethics and Applied psychology. The work on Cognition tackled in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science brings together disciplines like Cognitive science and Task (project management).
It features Cognitive psychology research that overlaps with concepts in Social psychology.
The journal publications investigate studies in Human factors and ergonomics, Cognition, Human–computer interaction, Situation awareness and Automation. The journal articles hold forums on Human factors and ergonomics that merge themes from other disciplines such as Epistemology, Management science, Psychological intervention and Applied psychology. Aside from discussions in Cognition, the journal articles also deal with the subject of Cognitive psychology which intersects with Cognitive science disciplines.
The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Human factors and ergonomics, Cognitive psychology, Risk analysis (engineering), Physical medicine and rehabilitation and Cognition. Human factors and ergonomics research featured in the journal incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Psychological intervention, Engineering ethics, China, Set (psychology) and Physical therapy. In it, Construct (philosophy), Fuzzy logic and Competence (human resources) are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Cognitive psychology research.
The studies on Risk analysis (engineering) discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Risk management tools, Ecological psychology, Diurnal rhythms and Emerging technologies. While the primary focus in the journal is Physical medicine and rehabilitation, it also dissects topics surrounding Occupational safety and health and Intra-rater reliability and Inter-rater reliability as a whole. It focused on Cognition research but expanded to cover User Research.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.78% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 10.91% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 1.82% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 23.64% of all publications and 63.64% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Gustav Markkula;Ruth Madigan;Dimitris Nathanael;Evangelia Portouli
(2020)Gerald Matthews;Joost De Winter;Peter A. Hancock
(2020)Sina Nordhoff;Ruth Madigan;Bart Van Arem;Natasha Merat
(2020)S.C. Calvert;D.D. Heikoop;G. Mecacci;B. van Arem
(2020)Rinta Kridalukmana;Hai Yan Lu;Mohsen Naderpour
(2020)Aaron P. J. Roberts;Neville A. Stanton;Katherine L. Plant;Daniel T. Fay
(2020)Lee Skrypchuk;Pat Langdon;Ben D. Sawyer;P. John Clarkson
(2020)Yusuke Yamani;Siby Samuel;Sarah Yahoodik;Donald L. Fisher
(2021)Choosing the right degree is crucial for a successful career in engineering and technology. Many students are turning to an online engineering degree to gain flexibility, affordability, and access to quality education without relocating. These programs often include specializations in high-demand fields, helping graduates stand out in a competitive job market.
For professionals aiming to lead organizations or manage technical teams, pursuing an online doctorate in organizational leadership can enhance leadership skills and open doors to executive roles. Such advanced degrees complement technical expertise with strategic insight.
For those seeking a quicker entry into the workforce, an easiest associate degree can provide foundational knowledge with a shorter commitment, serving as a stepping stone toward more specialized study or employment in technical support roles.
Additionally, fields like construction management are expanding, offering opportunities with online bachelor's programs. An online construction management bachelors degree provides essential skills for managing projects, teams, and resources efficiently, positioning graduates for leadership roles in the construction industry.
