| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 540 | 85 | 199 | 14 |
| Medicine | 1663 | 82 | 174 | 15 |
The aim of Nuclear Medicine and Biology is to expand the discussion of research in In vivo, Biodistribution, Stereochemistry, Biochemistry and In vitro. In vivo research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Receptor, Pharmacology, Molecular biology and Pathology. The presentations focused mostly on Receptor in an attempt to further explore topics in Internal medicine.
The study on Molecular biology presented in it intersects with the topics under Monoclonal antibody. Nuclear Medicine and Biology covers Monoclonal antibody research under the subject of Antibody. Nuclear Medicine and Biology facilitates discussions on Biodistribution that incorporate concepts from other fields like Pharmacokinetics, Cancer research, Positron emission tomography, Nuclear medicine and Radiochemistry.
Some problems in Radiochemistry that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Yield (chemistry) and Radiosynthesis. It holds forums on Stereochemistry that merges themes from other disciplines such as Ligand (biochemistry), Chelation, Ligand, High-performance liquid chromatography and Chemical synthesis. Metabolism is part of Biochemistry studies tackled in Nuclear Medicine and Biology.
The main points discussed in the journal papers deal with In vivo, Biodistribution, Biochemistry, Nuclear medicine and In vitro. The published papers with studies in In vivo featured incorporate elements of Pathology, Receptor, Internal medicine, Molecular biology and Stereochemistry. The published papers focus on Biodistribution but sometimes tackle the closely related topic of Radiochemistry which is concerned with High-performance liquid chromatography and Nuclear chemistry.
The concepts of Cancer research, In vivo, Radiochemistry, Combinatorial chemistry and Pet imaging are tackled in the journal. Issues in Cancer research were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Prostate cancer and Radionuclide therapy. The work on In vivo tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like In vitro, Stereochemistry and Pharmacology.
The in-depth study on Radiochemistry also explores topics in the intersecting field of DOTA. Biodistribution and Ex vivo are closely related fields of research discussed in Nuclear Medicine and Biology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Nuclear Medicine and Biology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Nuclear Medicine and Biology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 69.65% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.23% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.54% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 24.36% of all publications and 44.87% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Nathalie Heynickx;Ken Herrmann;Koen Vermeulen;Sarah Baatout
(2021)Thomas Graham;Eric Hostetler;Stefan Verhoog;Hsiaoju Lee
(2021)Yutian Feng;Michael R. Zalutsky
(2021)Matthias M. Herth;Simon Ametamey;Dmitrii Antuganov;Andreas Bauman
(2021)John A. Katzenellenbogen
(2021)Francis Man;Azalea A. Khan;Amaia Carrascal-Miniño;Philip J. Blower
(2020)Lorain Geenen;Julie Nonnekens;Mark Konijnenberg;Sarah Baatout
(2021)Carina Stegmayr;Gabriele Stoffels;Christian Filß;Alexander Heinzel
(2021)For those interested in medicine, there are several related online degrees that can complement or provide alternative career pathways. One popular option is exploring online pharmacy schools, which offer flexible programs for aspiring pharmacists aiming to work in clinical settings or research.
Nutrition and physical health are also integral to medical careers. Pursuing an exercise science and nutrition degree online can provide a strong foundation in understanding how lifestyle impacts health, opening doors to wellness coaching, rehabilitation, and fitness careers.
Similarly, online kinesiology degrees focus on human movement and biomechanics. Graduates often work in physical therapy assistance, athletic training, or research, all valuable roles within the broader healthcare ecosystem.
For advanced practice nurses specializing in mental health, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs offer an accelerated route to certification. These programs are ideal for registered nurses looking to expand their expertise into psychiatric mental health.
Exploring these varied online degrees can help students and professionals tailor their medical careers to their interests and lifestyle needs.