1065-6251
Published by: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunology | 233 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Medicine | 1863 | 28 | 36 | 14 |
Immunology, Internal medicine, Cell biology, Stem cell and Haematopoiesis are the subjects of interest in Current Opinion in Hematology. The journal investigates Immunology research which frequently intersects with Disease. The concepts on Disease presented in Current Opinion in Hematology can also apply to other research fields, including Bioinformatics and Intensive care medicine.
Current Opinion in Hematology holds forums on Intensive care medicine that merges themes from other disciplines such as Surgery and MEDLINE. While the primary focus in Current Opinion in Hematology is Internal medicine, it also dissects topics surrounding Oncology and Chemotherapy as a whole. It explores topics in Cell biology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Endothelial stem cell, Receptor, Transcription factor and Cellular differentiation.
It focused on Stem cell research but expanded to cover Bone marrow. Current Opinion in Hematology addresses concerns in Haematopoiesis which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Progenitor cell and Cancer research. The work on Transplantation presented in the journal focuses on Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in particular.
The published articles mainly deal with areas of study such as Immunology, Cell biology, Internal medicine, Cancer research and Stem cell. Immunology research in the published papers connects with the study of Disease. The journal publications facilitate discussions on Stem cell that incorporate concepts from other fields like Bone marrow and Transplantation.
Current Opinion in Hematology mainly deals with areas of study such as Haematopoiesis, Disease, Computational biology, Stem cell and Myeloid. The research on Haematopoiesis tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Niche, Cancer research, Progenitor cell, Erythropoiesis and Transplantation. Transplantation studies tackled cover an aspect of the field of Internal medicine.
While the journal focused on Disease, it was also able to explore topics like Immunology, Intensive care medicine, Cell therapy, Vascular disease and Physiology. Some problems in Immunology that were presented in Current Opinion in Hematology overlapped with concepts under Clonal hematopoiesis, Endothelium and Macrophage. It covers Stem cell research under the subject of Cell biology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Current Opinion in Hematology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Current Opinion in Hematology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.45% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 23.21% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.71% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 30.36% of all publications and 35.71% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
John W. Semple;Johan Rebetz;Amal Maouia;Rick Kapur
(2020)Carlos Fernández-Hernando;Yajaira Suárez
(2020)Ashwin Kishtagari;Ross L Levine;Aaron D Viny
(2020)Leo Nicolai;Steffen Massberg
(2020)Alexandra Power-Hays;Russell E Ware
(2020)Gloria E. Hernandez;M. Luisa Iruela-Arispe
(2020)Isidoro Cobo;Tiffany Tanaka;Christopher K Glass;Calvin Yeang
(2021)For those exploring Medicine in the USA, there are diverse online degree options that complement traditional medical education. Nurses seeking to advance their careers might consider pursuing a dnp program, which offers specialized clinical training and leadership skills in a flexible format.
Alternatively, careers in healthcare administration or management are growing rapidly. Students interested in the business side of healthcare can explore top-rated health administration degree online programs, designed to equip professionals with essential organizational and policy-making expertise.
For those wanting to enter the healthcare field quickly, programs like the low cost medical coding and billing online program provide valuable skills for administrative roles, offering an affordable and accessible path that supports the medical infrastructure.
Nursing remains a critical pathway, and many students find success enrolling in the easiest bsn program to get into, which balances accessibility with quality education, helping aspiring nurses launch their careers efficiently.
