| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 446 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Audiology, Cochlear implant, Cochlear implantation, Surgery and Hearing loss. The journal explores topics in Audiology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Speech perception, Perception, Language development and Active listening. While Cochlear Implants International focused on Cochlear implant, it was also able to explore topics like Rehabilitation, Speech recognition, Implant, Cochlea and Biomedical engineering.
The Cochlea study featured falls within the wider field of Anatomy. Sensorineural hearing loss, Pediatrics, Retrospective cohort study and Temporal bone are some topics wherein Cochlear implantation research discussed in the journal have an impact. The majority of Surgery studies presented zero in on Complication.
Cochlear implant, Audiology, Cochlear implantation, Implant and Hearing loss are the main subjects of interest in the published papers. The published articles explore issues in Cochlear implant which can be linked to other research areas like Surgery, Retrospective cohort study, Language development, Cochlea and Pediatrics. The published Audiology research zeroes in on concepts in Hearing aid but also tackles themes under Candidacy.
Cochlear Implants International primarily focuses on research topics in Cochlear implant, Audiology, Cochlear implantation, Hearing loss and Magnetic resonance imaging. Cochlear implant research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Cochlear implant surgery. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Audiology, it also covered topics in Chart review, Language development and Spoken language.
Cochlear Implants International focuses on Cochlear implantation but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Quality of life, Nuclear medicine, Speech production, Computed tomography and Temporal bone. The concepts on Hearing loss presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Visual attention, Cross modal plasticity, Pediatrics and Implant. Some problems in Magnetic resonance imaging that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under User perception and Medical imaging.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Cochlear Implants International (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Cochlear Implants International (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 14.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.93% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.28% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.60% of all publications and 44.19% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An understanding of the journals and research related to cochlear implantation would not be complete without a brief exploration of the professionals who work directly with patients needing cochlear implants: the Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs). SLPs are healthcare professionals who have specialized training in diagnosing and treating speech and language disorders. Cochlear implants are often used for patients with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss often managed by SLPs. These professionals are integral to assessing candidacy for a cochlear implant and play a crucial role in the rehabilitation process following cochlear implant surgery. They provide auditory-verbal therapy to help patients with cochlear implants learn or relearn how to hear and process sounds. The specific role and responsibilities of the SLP might vary depending on several factors such as the setting in which they work, the age, and the needs of the patients they serve. Their interventions often include personalized therapy plans that focus on language development, speech recognition, and active listening - areas that align closely with the research topics outlined in the Cochlear Implants International Journal. For those interested in a career as an SLP in cochlear implant rehabilitation, the requirements may vary by state. For instance, you can find the specifics of the pennsylvania slp license requirements online. It's worth noting that the field requires a blend of precise scientific understanding, practical clinical skills, and deeply empathetic patient care. Ultimately, whether they're contributing to cutting-edge research or applying that research in practical, patient-focused ways, SLPs are an essential component of the cochlear implantation process.
Anandhan E. Dhanasingh;Gunesh Rajan;Paul van de Heyning
(2020)Paul Van de Heyning;Marcus Atlas;Wolf Dieter Baumgartner;Marco Caversaccio
(2020)
