| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1166 | 7 | 9 | 4 |
Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties tackles a plethora of topics, such as Reading (process), Mathematics education, Developmental psychology, Pedagogy and Learning disability. The research on Reading (process) featured in the journal combines topics in other fields like Cognitive psychology and Spelling. Discussions in the journal are anchored in the subject of Cognitive psychology and the similar topic of Metacognition.
It explores topics in Mathematics education which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Numeracy, Literacy and Curriculum. Phonemic awareness is a focus of the Literacy works in the journal. Developmental psychology research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Test (assessment), Dyslexia, Intervention (counseling) and Cognition, Intelligence quotient.
Pedagogy and Special needs are closely related fields of research discussed in Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties connects research in Reading comprehension with the related topic of Comprehension. The in-depth study on Phonological awareness also explores topics in the intersecting field of Vocabulary.
The most cited papers aim to foster the development of research in Reading (process), Mathematics education, Pedagogy, Learning disability and Developmental psychology. The most cited papers with studies in Reading (process) featured incorporate elements of Public policy and Cultural capital. The journal papers about Mathematics education cover related areas such as Teaching method and also touches on topics like Assessment methods.
The main research concerns discussed in the journal are Literacy, Dyslexia, Spell, Mathematics education and Exploratory research. In addition to Literacy research, it aims to explore topics under Developmental psychology, Response to intervention and Reading (process). The studies in Dyslexia featured incorporate elements of Self-efficacy, Literacy skill, First language, Mandarin Chinese and Language learner.
It held discussions to help close the divide between the fields of Spell and Empirical evidence, Cognitive psychology, Error analysis and Spelling. The journal focused on Mathematics education research but expanded to cover Empirical research.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 33.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 0.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 50.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 25.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Another significant aspect to consider when assessing the scope and impact of the journal is the standing and influence of the contributing institutions. This includes identifying the geographical distribution, number of contributing authors and ranking of participating educational institutions. Often, the research work and publications from top-rated universities and colleges make a significant stride in the field, shaping the future trajectory of research.
For a comprehensive understanding of this factor, we can refer to other resources such as the list of top 10 best psychology schools in New Mexico, which provides an excellent benchmark for comparing and contrasting the performance and impact of various institutions.
Understanding these dynamics can provide future contributors to the Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties with valuable insights into the broader research environment, allowing them to strategically position their work and contributions.
Mary Claessen;Peta Dzidic;Mark Boyes;Nicholas Badcock
(2020)Meree Reynolds;Jennifer Buckingham;Alison Madelaine;Sarah Arakelian
(2021)Studying psychology in the USA opens many doors to diverse career paths, from clinical roles to research and counseling. For those seeking flexible options, pursuing an associates degrees online can be a practical first step, providing foundational knowledge and skills while accommodating busy schedules.
Advancing your education with a graduate program is often essential in psychology careers. Choosing one of the masters degrees that are worth it ensures you gain specialized expertise that meets current market demands and increases employability.
Cost is a major consideration when selecting a program. Fortunately, there are many affordable online courses available, allowing students to pursue quality education without excessive debt. Additionally, some students worry about GPA requirements; however, numerous institutions are listed among the college that accepts low gpa options, making higher education more accessible for non-traditional learners.
Ultimately, exploring these online degree opportunities can help you tailor your psychology education to fit your career goals, budget, and academic background.
