International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE)

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page is dedicated to the field of Computer Science and has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, a distinguished authority in providing trusted data on scientific contributions since 2014. Renowned for its comprehensive coverage across all major fields, including Computer Science, Research.com draws on extensive expertise to deliver objective and reliable rankings for the academic community.

The position of each conference within this ranking is determined through a unique bibliometric score developed exclusively by Research.com. This score is calculated using a sophisticated methodology that incorporates the estimated h-index of the conference, along with the number of leading scientists who have contributed to the event during the past three years. This approach allows for a nuanced and in-depth assessment of each conference's scientific influence and reputation within the field.

Impact Score values for this ranking were compiled as of 2024-11-27, ensuring that the data reflects the most up-to-date and relevant metrics. The evaluation process was highly rigorous, involving the initial review of over 2,742 scientific conferences. These conferences were carefully selected following a thorough and expert-led examination of more than 148,739 scientific documents published in the last three years by a cohort of 13,184 distinguished and respected scientists in Computer Science. This detailed process underscores the comprehensive nature and reliability of the ranking.

For readers interested in a more detailed understanding of the methods and criteria utilized in computing these ranking scores, a full overview is available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Web Information Systems Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:

• Quan Z. Sheng (17 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Katsumi Tanaka (14 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Yanchun Zhang (13 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Xiaofang Zhou (12 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Flavius Frasincar (12 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Web Information Systems Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of New South Wales (24 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Queensland (22 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Swinburne University of Technology (21 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition,
• Chinese Academy of Sciences (21 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Macquarie University (19 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 46.48% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 11.27% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.90% of all publications and 25.35% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.