33rd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR)

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page focuses exclusively on premier events in the field of Computer Science. This ranking has been meticulously compiled by Research.com, a leading platform for science research information across all major disciplines. Since 2014, Research.com has provided the scientific community with reliable and comprehensive data concerning scholarly contributions.

The ranking leverages a unique bibliometric score, carefully developed by the experts at Research.com. Each conference’s position is determined using this score, which incorporates two primary criteria: the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in the conference over the last three years. This approach ensures that the impact and academic reputation of each conference are accurately captured and evaluated.

The current edition of the ranking utilizes Impact Score values collected on 2024-11-27. In establishing this comprehensive list, the Research.com team rigorously examined over 2742 conferences. These conferences were selected after an extensive review process involving the inspection and assessment of more than 148,739 scientific documents published in the last three years by 13,184 leading and widely respected scientists working in Computer Science.

This in-depth analytical process underscores the credibility and objectivity of the resulting ranking. The methodology reflects a robust and transparent approach, ensuring that the evaluation of conferences is grounded in quantitative performance indicators and the recognized influence of conference participants. For further details on the methodology employed in calculating the ranking scores, please visit our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at International Conference on Concurrency Theory (based on the number of publications) are:

• Thomas A. Henzinger (12 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Nobuko Yoshida (11 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Krishnendu Chatterjee (9 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Nicolas Markey (8 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Matthew Hennessy (8 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at International Conference on Concurrency Theory (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Oxford (25 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Paris Diderot University (21 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• École normale supérieure de Cachan (18 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Institute of Science and Technology Austria (17 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Université libre de Bruxelles (17 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 7.89% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 40.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 8.57% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.71% of all publications and 25.71% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.