World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
5893
World Ranking
9425
National Ranking
3985

Thomas J. Morrow publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Morrow sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 76 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas J. Morrow D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Morrow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Morrow is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a specialization in artificial intelligence. The main topic within their work is machine learning applied to healthcare, reflecting an interest in combining advanced computational approaches with medical data.

Their recent publications feature contributions to the intersection of machine learning and healthcare prediction models. Notably, they co-authored a 2025 paper titled Enhancing Cause of Death Prediction: Development and Validation of ML Models Using Multimodal Data Across Multiple Healthcare Sites, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Morrow collaborates with multiple researchers across their publications. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mohammed Ali Al-Garadi
  • Rishi Desai
  • Kerry Ngan
  • Michele L. Lenoue-Newton
  • Ruth Reeves

Their work appears predominantly in the publication venue bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), indicating engagement with preprint dissemination in the biological and medical sciences.

The combination of machine learning techniques with healthcare data characterizes Morrow's contributions to their field. This includes development and validation of predictive models that utilize multimodal data from various healthcare sites, aiming to improve clinical prediction outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Positron emission tomographic analysis of cerebral structures activated specifically by repetitive noxious heat stimuli

    Kenneth L. Casey;Satoshi Minoshima;Kevin L. Berger;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Comparison of human cerebral activation pattern during cutaneous warmth, heat pain, and deep cold pain

    Kenneth L. Casey;Satoshi Minoshima;Thomas J. Morrow;Robert A. Koeppe

  • Gender differences in pain perception and patterns of cerebral activation during noxious heat stimulation in humans

    Pamela E Paulson;Satoshi Minoshima;Thomas J Morrow;Kenneth L Casey

  • Cerebral processing of acute skin and muscle pain in humans.

    Peter Svensson;Satoshi Minoshima;Ahmad Beydoun;Thomas J. Morrow;Thomas J. Morrow

  • Early Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Is Associated with Differential Changes in Tetrodotoxin-sensitive and -resistant Sodium Channels in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons in the Rat

    Shuangsong Hong;Thomas J. Morrow;Pamela E. Paulson;Lori L. Isom

  • Variability of laser-evoked potentials: attention, arousal and lateralized differences

    Ahmad A. Beydoun;Ahmad A. Beydoun;Thomas J. Morrow;Thomas J. Morrow;Joanne F. Shen;Joanne F. Shen;Kenneth L. Casey;Kenneth L. Casey

  • A Unique Representation of Heat Allodynia in the Human Brain

    Jürgen Lorenz;Jürgen Lorenz;Donna J. Cross;Satoshi Minoshima;Thomas J. Morrow

  • Selective Opiate Modulation of Nociceptive Processing in the Human Brain

    Kenneth L. Casey;Peter Svensson;Thomas J. Morrow;Jonathan Raz

  • Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Human Forebrain Activity During Heat Pain: Analysis by Positron Emission Tomography

    Kenneth L. Casey;Thomas J. Morrow;Jürgen Lorenz;Satoshi Minoshima

  • Medial frontal cortex lesions selectively attenuate the hot plate response: possible nocifensive apraxia in the rat.

    Laura N. Pastoriza;Thomas J. Morrow;Thomas J. Morrow;Kenneth L. Casey;Kenneth L. Casey

  • Cocaine: evidence for supraspinal, dopamine-mediated, non-opiate analgesia

    Yu Lin;Thomas J. Morrow;Thomas J. Morrow;Judith A. Kiritsy-Roy;L. Cass Terry;L. Cass Terry

  • Topical capsaicin selectively attenuates heat pain and A δ fiber-mediated laser-evoked potentials

    Ahmad Beydoun;D. B.S. Dyke;T. J. Morrow;T. J. Morrow;K. L. Casey;K. L. Casey

  • Long-term changes in behavior and regional cerebral blood flow associated with painful peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat.

    Pamela E. Paulson;Kenneth L. Casey;Thomas J. Morrow

  • Laser-evoked cerebral potentials and sensory function in patients with central pain

    K. L. Casey;A. Beydoun;A. Beydoun;J. Boivie;B. Sjolund

  • Cutaneous pain and detection thresholds to short CO2 laser pulses in humans: evidence on afferent mechanisms and the influence of varying stimulus conditions.

    Antti Pertovaara;Antti Pertovaara;Thomas J. Morrow;Thomas J. Morrow;Kenneth L. Casey;Kenneth L. Casey

  • Animal models of painful diabetic neuropathy: the STZ rat model.

    Thomas J. Morrow

  • Bilateral behavioral and regional cerebral blood flow changes during painful peripheral mononeuropathy in the rat.

    Pamela E Paulson;Thomas J Morrow;Thomas J Morrow;Kenneth L Casey;Kenneth L Casey

  • Regional changes in forebrain activation during the early and late phase of formalin nociception: analysis using cerebral blood flow in the rat

    Thomas J Morrow;Pamela E Paulson;Pamela E Paulson;Peggy J Danneman;Peggy J Danneman;Kenneth L Casey;Kenneth L Casey

  • Ventral posterior thalamic neurons differentially responsive to noxious stimulation of the awake monkey.

    Unknown

  • Nocifensive responses to cutaneous thermal stimuli in the cat: stimulus-response profiles, latencies, and afferent activity

    K. L. Casey;T. J. Morrow

  • Chronic, selective forebrain responses to excitotoxic dorsal horn injury

    Thomas J. Morrow;Pamela E. Paulson;Pamela E. Paulson;Kori L. Brewer;Robert P. Yezierski

  • Mechanical Conflict System: A Novel Operant Method for the Assessment of Nociceptive Behavior.

    Steven E. Harte;Steven E. Harte;Jessica B. Meyers;Jessica B. Meyers;Renee R. Donahue;Bradley K. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth L. Casey
Kenneth L. Casey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Satoshi Minoshima
Satoshi Minoshima University of Utah
Ahmad Beydoun
Ahmad Beydoun American University of Beirut
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson Aarhus University
Antti Pertovaara
Antti Pertovaara University of Helsinki
Robert P. Yezierski
Robert P. Yezierski University of Florida
Burkhart Bromm
Burkhart Bromm Universität Hamburg
Peter L. Strick
Peter L. Strick University of Pittsburgh
Richard P. Dum
Richard P. Dum University of Pittsburgh
Marina Mata
Marina Mata University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Morrow