World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Burkhart Bromm

Burkhart Bromm

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
8704
World Ranking
6668
National Ranking
565

Burkhart Bromm publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burkhart Bromm sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 135 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Burkhart Bromm D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Burkhart Bromm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Burkhart Bromm is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany.

Best Publications

  • Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: a single-trial fMRI study

    K. Bornhövd;M. Quante;V. Glauche;B. Bromm

  • Nerve fibre discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by CO2 laser stimulation.

    B Bromm;R D Treede

  • NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF PAIN

    Burkhart Bromm;Jürgen Lorenz

  • Laser-evoked cerebral potentials in the assessment of cutaneous pain sensitivity in normal subjects and patients.

    B Bromm;R D Treede

  • Cortical representation of pain: functional characterization of nociceptive areas near the lateral sulcus

    Rolf Detlef Treede;A. Vania Apkarian;Burkhart Bromm;Joel D. Greenspan

  • Subcortical structures involved in pain processing: evidence from single-trial fMRI.

    U Bingel;M Quante;R Knab;B Bromm

  • Brain electrical source analysis of laser evoked potentials in response to painful trigeminal nerve stimulation.

    Burkhart Bromm;Andrew C.N. Chen

  • Late somatosensory evoked cerebral potentials in response to cutaneous heat stimuli

    R.-D. Treede;S. Kief;T. Hölzer;B. Bromm

  • Responses of human cutaneous afferents to CO2 laser stimuli causing pain.

    B. Bromm;M. T. Jahnke;R. D. Treede

  • Human cerebral potentials evoked by CO2 laser stimuli causing pain.

    B. Bromm;R. D. Treede

  • Middle and long latency somatosensory evoked potentials after painful laser stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

    J. Lorenz;K. Grasedyck;B. Bromm

  • Cognitive performance, mood and experimental pain before and during morphine-induced analgesia in patients with chronic non-malignant pain

    Jürgen Lorenz;Helge Beck;Burkhart Bromm

  • Evoked cerebral potential correlates of C-fibre activity in man.

    Burkhart Bromm;Horst Neitzel;Andreas Tecklenburg;Rolf-Detlef Treede

  • Single trial fMRI reveals significant contralateral bias in responses to laser pain within thalamus and somatosensory cortices

    U. Bingel;M. Quante;René Knab;B. Bromm

  • Cerebral potentials evoked by painful, laser stimuli in patients with syringomyelia.

    R. D. Treede;J. Lankers;A. Frieling;W. H. Zangemeister

  • Cortical correlates of false expectations during pain intensity judgments--a possible manifestation of placebo/nocebo cognitions.

    Jürgen Lorenz;Michael Hauck;Robert C. Paur;Yoko Nakamura

  • Pain related cerebral potentials: late and ultralate components.

    B. Bromm;R. D. Treede

  • How best to fight that nasty itch - From new insights into the neuroimmunological, neuroendocrine, and neurophysiological bases of pruritus to novel therapeutic approaches

    Tamás Bíró;M. C. Ko;Burkhart Bromm;Edward T. Wei

  • The pain inhibiting pain effect: an electrophysiological study in humans

    Andreas Reinert;Rolf-Detlef Treede;Burkhart Bromm

  • Imipramine reduces experimental pain.

    B. Bromm;W. Meier;E. Scharein

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf-Detlef Treede
Rolf-Detlef Treede Heidelberg University
Christian Büchel
Christian Büchel University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Ulrike Bingel
Ulrike Bingel University of Duisburg-Essen
Volkmar Glauche
Volkmar Glauche University of Freiburg
Cornelius Weiller
Cornelius Weiller University of Freiburg
Josef Dudel
Josef Dudel Technical University of Munich
Hans-Georg Schaible
Hans-Georg Schaible Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Klaus Ballanyi
Klaus Ballanyi University of Alberta
Robert F. Schmidt
Robert F. Schmidt University of Würzburg
Ralf Schneggenburger
Ralf Schneggenburger École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Burkhart Bromm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles