World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
Germany
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 84 1364 1292 105 99 411 25297

Thomas Dandekar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Dandekar between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Dandekar published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2023. 32 of the 555 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2023. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 20 publications
1985 2025

555 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Dandekar: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 4
1992 3
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 8
1998 12
1999 10
2000 9
2001 7
2002 12
2003 7
2004 13
2005 14
2006 18
2007 11
2008 17
2009 11
2010 18
2011 13
2012 24
2013 16
2014 24
2015 20
2016 18
2017 37
2018 18
2019 23
2020 25
2021 33
2022 40
2023 43
2024 12
2025 20
Total 555
Download as CSV

Thomas Dandekar publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dandekar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 405–414 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 411 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40 411
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Dandekar D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Dandekar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110 84
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Thomas Dandekar is affiliated with the University of Würzburg in Germany. Their research spans primarily the domains of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these fields, Dandekar has contributed extensively to subfields including Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Plant Science, Immunology, and Genetics.

Dandekar's recent scientific output highlights several publications across prominent journals. Notable papers include:

  • Platelet glycoprotein VI promotes metastasis through interaction with cancer cell-derived Galectin-3, 2020, Blood
  • Integrative functional genomics decodes herpes simplex virus 1, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Rapid proliferation due to better metabolic adaptation results in full virulence of a filament-deficient Candida albicans strain, 2021, Nature Communications
  • An optimized genetically encoded dual reporter for simultaneous ratio imaging of Ca2+ and H+ reveals new insights into ion signaling in plants, 2021, New Phytologist
  • ACKR3 regulates platelet activation and ischemia-reperfusion tissue injury, 2022, Nature Communications

Their work covers a variety of research topics, focusing on:

  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Dandekar often collaborates with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including Meik Kunz, Elena Bencúrová, Özge Osmanoğlu, Chunguang Liang, and Mugdha Srivastava.

The majority of their publications appear in several key venues, such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

In addition to journal articles, Thomas Dandekar has authored a book published by Springer Nature titled Bioinformatik am Beispiel des SARS-CoV2 Virus und der Covid19 Pandemie in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact

    Thomas Dandekar;Berend Snel;Martijn Huynen;Peer Bork

  • A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks.

    Stefan Schuster;David A. Fell;Thomas Dandekar;Thomas Dandekar

  • Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering

    Stefan Schuster;Thomas Dandekar;Thomas Dandekar;David A. Fell

  • Identifying functional modules in protein–protein interaction networks

    Marcus T. Dittrich;Gunnar W. Klau;Andreas Rosenwald;Thomas Dandekar

  • 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation

    Alexander Keller;Tina Schleicher;Jörg Schultz;Tobias Müller

  • Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back.

    Peer Bork;Thomas Dandekar;Yolande Diaz-Lazcoz;Frank Eisenhaber

  • Carbon metabolism of intracellular bacterial pathogens and possible links to virulence.

    Wolfgang Eisenreich;Thomas Dandekar;Jürgen Heesemann;Werner Goebel;Werner Goebel

  • 4SALE--a tool for synchronous RNA sequence and secondary structure alignment and editing.

    Philipp N Seibel;Tobias Müller;Thomas Dandekar;Jörg Schultz

  • Identification of a novel iron-responsive element in murine and human erythroid delta-aminolevulinic acid synthase mRNA.

    T Dandekar;R Stripecke;N K Gray;B Goossen

  • Long noncoding RNA Chast promotes cardiac remodeling.

    Janika Viereck;Regalla Kumarswamy;Ariana Foinquinos;Ke Xiao

  • Pathway alignment: application to the comparative analysis of glycolytic enzymes.

    Thomas Dandekar;Thomas Dandekar;Stefan Schuster;Berend Snel;Berend Snel;Martijn Huynen;Martijn Huynen;Martijn Huynen

  • Metabolic Interdependence of Obligate Intracellular Bacteria and Their Insect Hosts

    Evelyn Zientz;Thomas Dandekar;Roy Gross

  • Synchronous visual analysis and editing of RNA sequence and secondary structure alignments using 4SALE

    Philipp N Seibel;Tobias Müller;Thomas Dandekar;Matthias Wolf

  • Single-cell genomics reveals the lifestyle of Poribacteria, a candidate phylum symbiotically associated with marine sponges

    Alexander Siegl;Janine Kamke;Thomas Hochmuth;Jörn Piel

  • The linear chromosome of the plant-pathogenic mycoplasma 'Candidatus Phytoplasma mali'

    Michael Kube;Bernd Schneider;Heiner Kuhl;Thomas Dandekar

  • Re-annotating the Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome sequence: adding value, function and reading frames

    Thomas Dandekar;Martijn Huynen;Jörg Thomas Regula;Barbara Ueberle

  • BioNet: an R-Package for the functional analysis of biological networks

    Daniela Beisser;Gunnar W. Klau;Thomas Dandekar;Tobias Müller

  • Processing of the precursors to small nucleolar RNAs and rRNAs requires common components.

    Elisabeth Petfalski;Thomas Dandekar;Yves Henry;David Tollervey

  • Exploring the pathway structure of metabolism: decomposition into subnetworks and application to Mycoplasma pneumoniae

    Stefan Schuster;Thomas Pfeiffer;Ferdinand Moldenhauer;Ina Koch

  • Fecal SCFAs and SCFA-producing bacteria in gut microbiome of human NAFLD as a putative link to systemic T-cell activation and advanced disease

    Monika Rau;Ateequr Rehman;Marcus Dittrich;Albert K Groen

Frequent Co-Authors

Peer Bork
Peer Bork European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Stefan Schuster
Stefan Schuster Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Jörg Schultz
Jörg Schultz University of Würzburg
Martijn A. Huynen
Martijn A. Huynen Radboud University Medical Center
Martina Schnölzer
Martina Schnölzer German Cancer Research Center
Roy Gross
Roy Gross University of Würzburg
Thomas Thum
Thomas Thum Hannover Medical School
Berend Snel
Berend Snel Utrecht University
Jörg Bernhardt
Jörg Bernhardt University of Greifswald
Patrick Argos
Patrick Argos Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens the door to many connected careers across healthcare and research fields. Students often explore additional or complementary qualifications for greater career flexibility and advancement. Online pathways make it easier to enhance your credentials while balancing work or family commitments.

For those interested in patient care, nursing programs that don't require teas are attractive options, removing barriers to entry for nursing careers. If you want to move quickly into the workforce, consider accelerated programs like the shortest lpn program available online.

Leadership and administrative roles in healthcare are also in demand. A master of healthcare administration can prepare graduates for management positions in hospitals, biotech companies, and public health organizations. For advanced practice and research opportunities, pursuing a phd in nursing can lead to teaching or high-level clinical roles.

With flexible online options, advancing your education and broadening your career pathways in genetics or related fields has never been more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Dandekar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles