World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
4554
World Ranking
3015
National Ranking
1034

S. Schreck publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Schreck sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 126 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

S. Schreck D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Schreck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel: A Comparison of Predictions to Measurements

    Unknown

  • Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80 ft × 120 ft wind tunnel: Navier-Stokes Predictions

    N. N. Sørensen;J. A. Michelsen;S. Schreck

  • Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80-by-120 wind tunnel

    Niels N. Sørensen;J.A. Michelsen;S. Schreck

  • Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • An Advanced Actuator Line Method for Wind Energy Applications and Beyond: Preprint

    Matthew Churchfield;Scott Schreck;Luis A. Martinez-Tossas;Charles Meneveau

  • Detached‐eddy simulation of flow around the NREL Phase VI blade

    Jeppe Johansen;Niels N. Sørensen;J.A. Michelsen;S. Schreck

  • Lift-curve characteristics for an airfoil pitching at constant rate

    E. J. Jumper;S. J. Schreck;R. L. Dimmick

  • Wind turbine power production and annual energy production depend on atmospheric stability and turbulence

    Clara M. St. Martin;Julie K. Lundquist;Julie K. Lundquist;Andrew Clifton;Gregory S. Poulos

  • Detached-eddy simulation of flow around the NREL Phase VI blade: Detached-eddy Simulation

    J. Johansen;N. N. Sørensen;J. A. Michelsen;S. Schreck

  • Analysis of Mexico wind tunnel measurements: Final report of IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 1)

    J.G. Schepers;K. Boorsma;T. Cho;S. Gomez-Iradi

  • Aerodynamic structures and processes in rotationally augmented flow fields

    Scott J. Schreck;Niels N. Sørensen;Michael C. Robinson

  • Neural networks: Applications and opportunities in aeronautics

    Unknown

  • The NREL full‐scale wind tunnel experiment Introduction to the special issue

    Unknown

  • Unsteady Fluid Mechanics Applications of Neural Networks

    Unknown

  • Unsteady vortex dynamics and surface pressure topologies on a finite pitching wing

    Unknown

  • Full-Scale Field Test of Wake Steering

    Paul Fleming;Jennifer Annoni;Andrew Scholbrock;Eliot Quon

  • Yaw aerodynamics analyzed with three codes in comparison with experiment

    Helge Aagaard Madsen;Niels N. So̸rensen;Scott Schreck

  • Real-time prediction of unsteady aerodynamics: Application for aircraft control and manoeuvrability enhancement

    Unknown

  • Rotational augmentation of horizontal axis wind turbine blade aerodynamic response

    Unknown

  • Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade Aerodynamics in Experiments and Modeling

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees and career pathways can broaden your opportunities beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For instance, fields like speech-language pathology are gaining attention for their growing demand and specialized skills. Understanding the slp acceptance rate helps prospective students gauge their chances of admission to competitive programs.

When considering alternatives, it’s important to evaluate different program options. Some universities offer the communication sciences and disorders programs known for their more accessible admission requirements, which can be appealing if you’re seeking a smoother entry into the healthcare communication field.

Cost is a crucial factor in any educational pursuit. Understanding how much does an online speech pathology degree cost helps applicants budget appropriately and compare financial aid options across schools offering remote learning.

Additionally, for veterans considering career shifts, there are tailored programs recognized as best military friendly online speech pathology degrees. These programs provide supportive environments and benefits that align well with military experience and schedules.

Recently Published Articles