World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Switzerland
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
60
Citations
30655
World Ranking
3154
National Ranking
72

Rudiger Urbanke publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudiger Urbanke sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 198 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rudiger Urbanke D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudiger Urbanke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Switzerland Leader Award
  • 2014 - IEEE Richard W. Hamming Medal “For fundamental contributions to coding theory, iterative information processing, and applications.”
  • 2011 - IEEE Koji Kobayashi Computers and Communications Award “For developing the theory and practice of transmitting data reliably at rates approaching channel capacity.”

Overview

Rudiger Urbanke is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the domain of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's work covers a variety of main topics such as:

  • Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Coding theory and cryptography
  • DNA and Biological Computing
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications

Recent published papers include:

  • Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell's theorem, 2022, Nature
  • On the Efficiency of Polar-Like Decoding for Symmetric Codes, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Communications
  • Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution, 2022, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Polar Codes Do Not Have Many Affine Automorphisms, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
  • Noether: The More Things Change, the More Stay the Same, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

The list of frequent co-authors features:

  • Kirill Ivanov
  • Grzegorz Głuch
  • D. P. Nadlinger
  • P. Drmota
  • B. C. Nichol

Publication venues where the scientist has appeared several times include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications
  • 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Awards received by Rudiger Urbanke encompass the IEEE Richard W. Hamming Medal in 2014, cited "For fundamental contributions to coding theory, iterative information processing, and applications," and the IEEE Koji Kobayashi Computers and Communications Award in 2011, recognized "For developing the theory and practice of transmitting data reliably at rates approaching channel capacity."

Best Publications

  • Design of capacity-approaching irregular low-density parity-check codes

    T.J. Richardson;M.A. Shokrollahi;R.L. Urbanke

  • The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding

    T.J. Richardson;R.L. Urbanke

  • Modern Coding Theory

    Tom Richardson;Ruediger Urbanke

  • On the design of low-density parity-check codes within 0.0045 dB of the Shannon limit

    Sae-Young Chung;G.D. Forney;T.J. Richardson;R. Urbanke

  • Efficient encoding of low-density parity-check codes

    T.J. Richardson;R.L. Urbanke

  • Analysis of sum-product decoding of low-density parity-check codes using a Gaussian approximation

    Sae-Young Chung;T.J. Richardson;R.L. Urbanke

  • Finite-length analysis of low-density parity-check codes on the binary erasure channel

    Changyan Di;D. Proietti;I.E. Telatar;T.J. Richardson

  • Systematic design of unitary space-time constellations

    B.M. Hochwald;T.L. Marzetta;T.J. Richardson;W. Sweldens

  • Threshold Saturation via Spatial Coupling: Why Convolutional LDPC Ensembles Perform So Well over the BEC

    S Kudekar;T J Richardson;Rüdiger L Urbanke

  • A rate-splitting approach to the Gaussian multiple-access channel

    B. Rimoldi;R. Urbanke

  • Spatially Coupled Ensembles Universally Achieve Capacity Under Belief Propagation

    Shrinivas Kudekar;Tom Richardson;Rudiger L. Urbanke

  • Polar Codes: Characterization of Exponent, Bounds, and Constructions

    Satish Babu Korada;Eren Şaşoğlu;Rüdiger Urbanke

  • Performance of polar codes for channel and source coding

    Nadine Hussami;Satish Babu Korada;Rudiger Urbanke

  • Multi-Edge Type LDPC Codes

    T. Richardson;R. Urbanke

  • Polar Codes are Optimal for Lossy Source Coding

    S.B. Korada;R.L. Urbanke

  • The renaissance of Gallager's low-density parity-check codes

    T. Richardson;R. Urbanke

  • Multiple-antenna signal constellations for fading channels

    D. Agrawal;T.J. Richardson;R.L. Urbanke

  • Reed–Muller Codes Achieve Capacity on Erasure Channels

    Shrinivas Kudekar;Santhosh Kumar;Marco Mondelli;Henry D. Pfister

  • Lattice codes can achieve capacity on the AWGN channel

    R. Urbanke;B. Rimoldi

  • Design of provably good low-density parity check codes

    T. Richardson;A. Shokrollahi;R. Urbanke

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Richardson
Tom Richardson Qualcomm (United States)
Igal Sason
Igal Sason Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Henry D. Pfister
Henry D. Pfister Duke University
Paul H. Siegel
Paul H. Siegel University of California, San Diego
Jack K. Wolf
Jack K. Wolf University of California, San Diego
Christina Fragouli
Christina Fragouli University of California, Los Angeles
Sewoong Oh
Sewoong Oh University of Washington
Warren J. Gross
Warren J. Gross McGill University
Sae-Young Chung
Sae-Young Chung Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Peter J. Winzer
Peter J. Winzer Nokia (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and exciting career paths. As technology evolves, many students look for flexible, accessible education options to enhance their skills or shift careers.

For those interested in data analytics or artificial intelligence, data science programs are in high demand and often offered entirely online. If you’re aiming to quickly transition into a leadership role, consider fastest online construction management degree options. These accelerated programs can jumpstart your career in less time.

For business-minded professionals, an mba online cheap can be a cost-effective way to gain advanced management skills and broaden career opportunities. Similarly, those seeking a fast track to specialization should explore one year masters programs that are available in a range of technical and professional fields.

Choosing the right online degree depends on your career goals, budget, and preferred pace of study. With so many tailored options in the U.S., there’s never been a better time to pursue your next qualification online.

Best Scientists Citing Rudiger Urbanke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles