World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
18621
World Ranking
3557
National Ranking
1712

Robert J. McEliece publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. McEliece sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 256 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert J. McEliece D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. McEliece sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - IEEE Alexander Graham Bell Medal “For fundamental contributions to the theory and practice of error-correcting codes and to the design of deep space telecommunication systems.”
  • 2004 - IEEE Claude E. Shannon Award

Overview

Robert J. McEliece was affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the fields of information theory and telecommunications, with a particular focus on the theory and practice of error-correcting codes. Their work played a role in advancing deep space telecommunication systems.

McEliece's research earned them notable recognition in their discipline. They received the IEEE Alexander Graham Bell Medal in 2009, with a citation acknowledging their fundamental contributions to error-correcting codes and deep space communication design. Earlier, in 2004, they were honored with the IEEE Claude E. Shannon Award.

No records of their recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study were documented in the source data.

Best Publications

  • A Public-Key Cryptosystem Based On Algebraic Coding Theory

    R. J. McEliece

  • On the inherent intractability of certain coding problems (Corresp.)

    E. Berlekamp;R. McEliece;H. van Tilborg

  • The capacity of the Hopfield associative memory

    Robert J. McEliece;Edward C. Posner;Eugene R. Rodemich;Santosh S. Venkatesh

  • Turbo decoding as an instance of Pearl's "belief propagation" algorithm

    R.J. McEliece;D.J.C. MacKay;Jung-Fu Cheng

  • The generalized distributive law

    Srinivas M. Aji;Robert J. McEliece

  • The theory of information and coding

    Robert J. McEliece

  • On sharing secrets and Reed-Solomon codes

    R. J. McEliece;D. V. Sarwate

  • New upper bounds on the rate of a code via the Delsarte-MacWilliams inequalities

    R. McEliece;E. Rodemich;H. Rumsey;L. Welch

  • Finite Fields for Computer Scientists and Engineers

    Robert J. McEliece

  • Channels with block interference

    R. McEliece;W. Stark

  • On the BCJR trellis for linear block codes

    R.J. McEliece

  • Channel assignment in cellular radio

    K.N. Sivarajan;R.J. McEliece;J.W. Ketchum

  • Transfer function bounds on the performance of turbo codes

    D. Divsalar;S. Dolinar;F. Pollara;R. J. Mceliece

  • On the decoder error probability for Reed - Solomon codes (Corresp.)

    R. McEliece;L. Swanson

  • Weights of irreducible cyclic codes

    Leonard D. Baumert;Robert J. McEliece

  • Practical codes for photon communication

    R. McEliece

  • The trellis complexity of convolutional codes

    R.J. McEliece;Wei Lin

  • Effective free distance of turbo codes

    D. Divsalar;R. J. McEliece

  • Coding theorems for turbo code ensembles

    Hui Jin;R.J. McEliece

  • Dynamic channel assignment in cellular radio

    K.N. Sivarajan;R.J. McEliece;J.W. Ketchum

  • On the decoder error probability for Reed-Solomon codes

    Robert J. McEliece;Laif Swanson

Frequent Co-Authors

Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar
Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar University of California, Davis
Dariush Divsalar
Dariush Divsalar Jet Propulsion Lab
Alexander Vardy
Alexander Vardy University of California, San Diego
Wayne E. Stark
Wayne E. Stark University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew M. Odlyzko
Andrew M. Odlyzko University of Minnesota
Babak Hassibi
Babak Hassibi California Institute of Technology
Michelle Effros
Michelle Effros California Institute of Technology
Sergio Verdu
Sergio Verdu Princeton University
Holger Boche
Holger Boche Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of specialized online degrees and career tracks. Today, many popular online colleges offer flexible programs designed to fit your schedule, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Whether you are passionate about building immersive digital worlds or safeguarding cyber systems, there’s a course for you. Consider pursuing a game development degree if you’re interested in designing video games—one of the fastest-growing industries globally.

Those looking to protect organizations from digital threats may benefit from enrolling in an online master’s degree cyber security, a field with increasing demand for skilled professionals.

Alternatively, a masters in construction management can help you branch into the intersection of technology and building industries, leading to diverse roles in tech-driven construction projects.

These online pathways provide flexibility and specialized skills for a dynamic job market, allowing students to tailor their education to match their career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. McEliece

Recently Published Articles