World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4137 3819 1970 1787 133 8415

Rima E. Rudd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rima E. Rudd between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rima E. Rudd published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 5 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication
1981 2023

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rima E. Rudd: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 7
1994 2
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 8
2000 2
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 6
2005 4
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 7
2010 5
2011 16
2012 5
2013 5
2014 5
2015 11
2016 7
2017 7
2018 5
2019 7
2020 5
2021 1
2022 4
2023 1
Total 139
Download as CSV

Rima E. Rudd publications per year - data summary

  • Rima E. Rudd, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Harvard University, has 139 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1986, 1996, 2001 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 12 of the 43 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.5 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 18 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 11 publications (0.7 per year); 1996-2010: 49 publications (3.3 per year); 2011-2023: 79 publications (6.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Rima E. Rudd publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rima E. Rudd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 133
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rima E. Rudd publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Rima E. Rudd, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Harvard University, records 133 publications - the 32nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 32% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Rima E. Rudd, and about 68% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Rima E. Rudd ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Rima E. Rudd D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rima E. Rudd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Rima E. Rudd D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Rima E. Rudd, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Harvard University, records 44 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Rima E. Rudd, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Rima E. Rudd ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Rima E. Rudd is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in health professions and social sciences. Their body of work extends across several interconnected subfields, including general health professions, sociology and political science, health, artificial intelligence, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

Their research topics concentrate on health literacy and information accessibility, health sciences research and education, climate change communication and perception, environmental education and sustainability, misinformation and its impacts, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and text readability and simplification.

Rudd has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals, including multiple publications with the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and the UNC Libraries. Other venues for their work include the Journal of Communications In Healthcare, Environmental Health, and the Health Information & Libraries Journal.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Health literacy and early insights during a pandemic," 2020, Journal of Communications In Healthcare
  • "Characterizing the Environmental Health Literacy and Sensemaking of Indoor Air Quality of Research Participants," 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "A Call for More Rigor in Science and Health Communication," 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health," 2022, Environmental Health
  • "Collaborative updating of an organizational health literacy tool confirms medical librarians' leadership roles," 2021, Health Information & Libraries Journal

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Cynthia Baur, Kathryn S. Tomsho, Erin Polka, Stacey Chacker, and David Queeley, each with multiple coauthored works. These partnerships reflect interdisciplinary engagements within their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA.

    J. Pulerwitz;H. Amaro;W. De Jong;S. L. Gortmaker

  • Social Marketing for Public Health

    Diana Chapman Walsh;Rima E. Rudd;Barbara A. Moeykens;Thomas W. Moloney

  • Health and Literacy: A Review of Medical and Public Health Literature

    Rima E. Rudd;Barbara A. Moeykens;Tayla C. Colton

  • Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit

    Darren A. DeWalt;Kimberly A. Broucksou;Victoria Hawk;Cindy Brach

  • Health Literacy and Child Health Promotion: Implications for Research, Clinical Care, and Public Policy

    Lee M. Sanders;Judith S. Shaw;Ghislaine Guez;Cynthia Baur

  • Literacy and Health in America. Policy Information Report.

    Rima Rudd;Irwin Kirsch;Kentaro Yamamoto

  • A mismatch between population health literacy and the complexity of health information: An observational study

    Gillian Rowlands;Joanne Protheroe;John Winkley;Marty Richardson

  • Health literacy skills of U.S. adults.

    Rima E. Rudd

  • Educational attainment and cigarette smoking: a causal association?

    Stephen E Gilman;Laurie T Martin;David B Abrams;Ichiro Kawachi

  • Improving low health literacy and patient engagement: A social ecological approach

    Lauren McCormack;Veronica Thomas;Megan A. Lewis;Rima Rudd

  • A Content Analysis of Direct-to-Consumer Television Prescription Drug Advertisements

    Kimberly A. Kaphingst;William Dejong;Rima E. Rudd;Lawren H. Daltroy

  • Numeracy and communication with patients: they are counting on us.

    Andrea J. Apter;Michael K. Paasche-Orlow;Janine T. Remillard;Ian M. Bennett

  • Improving Americans' health literacy.

    Rima E Rudd

  • Literacy and Learning in Health Care

    Michael S. Wolf;Elizabeth A.H. Wilson;David N. Rapp;Katherine R. Waite

  • Learner Developed Materials: An Empowering Product

    Rima E. Rudd;John P. Comings

  • Current perspectives on patient education in the US.

    Debra L. Roter;Ruth Stashefsky-Margalit;Rima Rudd

  • Health Insurance Literacy of Older Adults

    Lauren McCORMACK;Carla Bann;Jennifer Uhrig;Nancy Berkman

  • Considerations for a New Definition of Health Literacy

    Andrew Pleasant;Rima E Rudd;Catina O’Leary;Michael K Paasche-Orlow

  • Health literacy in the ''oral exchange'': An important element of patient-provider communication

    Sarah S. Nouri;Rima E. Rudd

  • Leave no one behind: improving health and risk communication through attention to literacy.

    Rima E. Rudd;John P. Comings;James N. Hyde

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen L. Buka
Stephen L. Buka Brown University
Kathryn Pitkin Derose
Kathryn Pitkin Derose RAND Corporation
Karen M. Emmons
Karen M. Emmons Harvard University
William DeJong
William DeJong Boston University
Dolores Acevedo-Garcia
Dolores Acevedo-Garcia Brandeis University
Graham A. Colditz
Graham A. Colditz Washington University in St. Louis
Debra L. Roter
Debra L. Roter Johns Hopkins University
Stephen E. Gilman
Stephen E. Gilman Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow Boston University
Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide spectrum of online degrees and careers. Today’s students have more flexible options than ever, thanks to innovative programs designed for busy professionals and motivated learners.

For those interested in counseling or research, the best online masters in psychology programs offer affordable pathways to careers in mental health, education, and social services. Aspiring leaders in education can advance with online doctorate of education programs, building expertise in policy, leadership, and curriculum development.

If speed is a priority, consider a master degree online that can be completed in just one year. For undergraduate students needing flexibility and quicker completion, exploring an accelerated online degree can fast-track your entry into the workforce.

These options enable learners to customize their education, balance work and study, and pursue diverse career pathways in fields ranging from psychology and education to the broader social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Rima E. Rudd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles