What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Surgery
- Artificial intelligence
- Geometry
His scientific interests lie mostly in Finite element method, Gait, Simulation, Contact mechanics and Parametric statistics.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Probabilistic logic and Sensitivity in addition to Finite element method.
Paul J. Rullkoetter has researched Simulation in several fields, including Total knee replacement and Knee replacement.
His Contact mechanics study is concerned with the larger field of Structural engineering.
His work deals with themes such as Joint laxity, Mathematical analysis and Statistical model, which intersect with Structural engineering.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Dynamic loading, Dynamic simulation and Nonlinear system in addition to Contact area.
His most cited work include:
- Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics (242 citations)
- The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements (219 citations)
- Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading. (131 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Finite element method, Orthodontics, Gait, Simulation and Contact mechanics.
His Finite element method study is related to the wider topic of Structural engineering.
His Orthodontics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Total knee replacement, Ligament, Femur, Surgery and Sagittal plane.
His Gait study combines topics in areas such as Activities of daily living and Artificial intelligence.
His Simulation research incorporates themes from Joint, Knee replacement and Knee simulator.
The various areas that Paul J. Rullkoetter examines in his Contact mechanics study include Dynamic loading, Contact area and Sensitivity.
He most often published in these fields:
- Finite element method (32.46%)
- Orthodontics (19.30%)
- Gait (18.42%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Orthodontics (19.30%)
- Gait (18.42%)
- Finite element method (32.46%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Paul J. Rullkoetter mainly focuses on Orthodontics, Gait, Finite element method, Patella and Joint.
His studies deal with areas such as Crepitus and Surgery, Femur, Ligament as well as Orthodontics.
His study in Gait is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Total knee replacement, Ground reaction force, Contact area, Artificial intelligence and Cadaveric spasm.
His Finite element method study is concerned with the field of Structural engineering as a whole.
His research integrates issues of Patellar ligament, Knee Joint and Contact mechanics in his study of Patella.
His Joint research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Wear testing, Anatomy and Dislocation.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Computational analysis of factors contributing to patellar dislocation. (45 citations)
- Validation of predicted patellofemoral mechanics in a finite element model of the healthy and cruciate-deficient knee. (37 citations)
- Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis (33 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Surgery
- Artificial intelligence
- Geometry
His main research concerns Gait, Knee Joint, Patella, Joint and Biomedical engineering.
His Gait study incorporates themes from Surgery, Probabilistic logic, Probabilistic analysis of algorithms and Isometric exercise.
His Knee Joint study deals with Range of motion intersecting with Orthodontics.
His studies in Patella integrate themes in fields like Engineering drawing, Radiography, Tracking, Fluoroscopy and Cadaveric spasm.
His work deals with themes such as Contact pressure, Total knee replacement, Knee simulator, Contact area and Wear testing, which intersect with Joint.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Biomechanics, narrowing it down to issues related to the Finite element method, and often Simulation.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
