World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4744
World Ranking
8846
National Ranking
3743

Norberto M. Grzywacz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norberto M. Grzywacz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Norberto M. Grzywacz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norberto M. Grzywacz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norberto M. Grzywacz is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology as notable subfields.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics related to perception and brain function, including:

  • Aesthetic perception and analysis
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Color perception and design
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and music perception

Norberto M. Grzywacz has authored several recent papers, showcasing their involvement in research related to aesthetic values and sensory perception. Selected publications include:

  • Does Amount of Information Support Aesthetic Values? (2022) published in Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • A Theoretical Framework for How We Learn Aesthetic Values (2020) published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Evolution of Neuroaesthetic Variables in Portrait Paintings throughout the Renaissance (2020) published in Entropy
  • What to Expect When the Unexpected Becomes Expected: Harmonic Surprise and Preference Over Time in Popular Music (2021) published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • The temporal instability of aesthetic preferences (2023) published in Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts

The scientist frequently collaborates with researchers including Hassan Aleem, Ivan Correa-Herran, Sébastien Berquet, Scott A. Miles, and David S. Rosen. These collaborations demonstrate a network of shared expertise especially in fields intersecting neuroscience and aesthetic perception.

Their research is often disseminated in specialized academic venues, with notable publication outlets including:

  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Entropy
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • A Model for the Estimate of Local Image Velocity by Cells in the Visual Cortex

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;A. L. Yuille

  • A computational theory for the perception of coherent visual motion.

    Alan L. Yuille;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • A mathematical analysis of the motion coherence theory

    Alan L. Yuille;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • The Motion Coherence Theory

    A.L. Yuille;N.M. Grzywacz

  • A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback

    Alan L. Yuille;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection

    Mark W. Pettet;Suzanne P. McKee;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise

    Scott N.J. Watamaniuk;Suzanne P. McKee;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Influence of spontaneous activity and visual experience on developing retinal receptive fields

    Evelyne Sernagor;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Power spectra and distribution of contrasts of natural images from different habitats.

    Rosario M Balboa;Norberto M Grzywacz

  • Temporal coherence theory for the detection and measurement of visual motion.

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;Scott N.J. Watamaniuk;Suzanne P. Mckee

  • A model of the directional selectivity circuit in retina: transformations by neurons singly and in concert

    Lyle J. Borg-Graham;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Inhibition in ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells of the rabbit retina

    F. R. Amthor;N. M. Grzywacz

  • Incremental rigidity scheme for recovering structure from motion: position-based versus velocity-based formulations

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;Ellen C. Hildreth

  • Necessity of acetylcholine for retinal directionally selective responses to drifting gratings in rabbit.

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;Franklin R. Amthor;David K. Merwine

  • The Perceptual Buildup of Three-Dimensional Structure from Motion

    Ellen C. Hildreth;Norberto M. Grzywacz;Edward H. Adelson;Victor K. Inada

  • Functional properties of models for direction selectivity in the retina

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;Christof Koch

  • Local motion detectors cannot account for the detectability of an extended trajectory in noise.

    Preeti Verghese;Scott N.J Watamaniuk;Suzanne P McKee;Norberto M Grzywacz

  • Morphological alterations in retinal neurons in the S334ter-line3 transgenic rat

    Aditi Ray;Gerald J. Sun;Leanne Chan;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • A bayesian model for the measurement of visual velocity.

    David Ascher;Norberto M. Grzywacz

  • Is the input to a GABAergic or cholinergic synapse the sole asymmetry in rabbit's retinal directional selectivity?

    Norberto M. Grzywacz;John S. Tootle;Franklin R. Amthor

  • Spontaneous activity in developing turtle retinal ganglion cells: Pharmacological studies

    Evelyne Sernagor;Norberto M. Grzywacz

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan L. Yuille
Alan L. Yuille Johns Hopkins University
Evelyne Sernagor
Evelyne Sernagor Newcastle University
Lucia M. Vaina
Lucia M. Vaina Boston University
Suzanne P. McKee
Suzanne P. McKee Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Cheryl M. Craft
Cheryl M. Craft University of Southern California
Jerry M. Mendel
Jerry M. Mendel University of Southern California
Ron Kikinis
Ron Kikinis Brigham and Women's Hospital
David Huang
David Huang Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a future in neuroscience, it’s important to explore a range of education and career options that align with your goals. Some students might look for college majors that make the most money to maximize earning potential after graduation. Neuroscience can open doors to high-paying roles, especially when combined with other sought-after skills or specializations.

For those seeking flexibility, there are online college courses with financial aid that make it easier to access quality education without the stress of overwhelming debt. These programs can be a stepping stone to further study or direct entry into related fields.

Boosting your credentials with certifications online can also increase job prospects in neuroscience, data analysis, psychology, or healthcare. If you’re searching for a lighter workload, there are also options among the easiest college majors that still offer valuable foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience.

Whatever your path, exploring these related degrees and credentials can provide flexible and rewarding routes to a successful neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing Norberto M. Grzywacz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles