World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mitchell S. McKinney

Mitchell S. McKinney

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
21
Citations
2036
World Ranking
1931
National Ranking
965

Mitchell S. McKinney publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell S. McKinney sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 17 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 65 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Mitchell S. McKinney D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell S. McKinney sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 73 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 21 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Introduction Political Information Efficacy and Young Voters

    Lynda Lee Kaid;Mitchell S. McKinney;John C. Tedesco

  • Political Campaign Debates

    Mitchell S. McKinney;Diana B. Carlin

  • Beyond learning and persona: extending the scope of presidential debate effects

    William L. Benoit;Mitchell S. McKinney;R. Lance Holbert

  • Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects

    Mitchell S. McKinney;Benjamin R. Warner

  • Live-Tweeting a Presidential Primary Debate: Exploring New Political Conversations

    Joshua Hawthorne;J. Brian Houston;Mitchell S. Mckinney

  • A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed‐gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates

    Mary Christine Banwart;Mitchell S. McKinney

  • Not Your Parents' Presidential Debates: Examining the Effects of the CNN/YouTube Debates on Young Citizens' Civic Engagement

    Mitchell S. McKinney;Leslie A. Rill

  • The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus

    Diana B. Carlin;Mitchell S. McKinney

  • Political Engagement Through Debates: Young Citizens' Reactions to the 2004 Presidential Debates

    Mitchell S. McKinney;Sumana Chattopadhyay

  • Effects of Watching Primary Debates in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign.

    William L. Benoit;Mitchell S. McKinney;Michael T. Stephenson

  • Social Watching a 2012 Republican Presidential Primary Debate

    Mitchell S. McKinney;J. Brian Houston;Joshua Hawthorne

  • Tweeting During Presidential Debates: Effect on Candidate Evaluations and Debate Attitudes

    J. Brian Houston;Joshua Hawthorne;Matthew L. Spialek;Molly Greenwood

  • To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates

    Benjamin R. Warner;Mitchell S. McKinney

  • The Front-Runner, Contenders, and Also-Rans: Effects of Watching a 2000 Republican Primary Debate

    Mitchell S. McKINNEY;Lynda Lee Kaid;Terry A. Robertson

  • Frequency of Tweeting During Presidential Debates: Effect on Debate Attitudes and Knowledge

    J. Brian Houston;Mitchell S. McKinney;Joshua Hawthorne;Matthew L. Spialek

  • Reconsidering partisanship as a constraint on the persuasive effects of debates

    Benjamin R. Warner;Mitchell S. McKinney;Josh C. Bramlett;Freddie J. Jennings

  • Rocking the Youth Vote Through Debate: examining the effects of a citizen versus journalist controlled debate on civic engagement

    Mitchell S. Mckinney;Mary C. Banwart

  • Co-Viewing, Tweeting, and Facebooking the 2012 Presidential Debates

    Esther Thorson;Joshua Hawthorne;Alecia Swasy;Mitchell S. McKinney

  • The twitterization of journalism: User perceptions of news tweets:

    J Brian Houston;Mitchell S McKinney;Esther Thorson;Joshua Hawthorne

  • Tweeting Presidential Primary Debates: Debate Processing Through Motivated Twitter Instruction:

    Freddie J. Jennings;Calvin R. Coker;Mitchell S. McKinney;Benjamin R. Warner

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles