World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
61
Citations
11601
World Ranking
2091
National Ranking
663

Michael E. Webber publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Webber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 304 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael E. Webber D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Webber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

Michael E. Webber is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of engineering, with 49 publications, and includes significant work in several subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Building and Construction, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their main research topics include Integrated Energy Systems Optimization, Smart Grid Energy Management, Building Energy and Comfort Optimization, Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Global Energy and Sustainability Research, and Energy and Environment Impacts.

Michael E. Webber has coauthored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Joshua D. Rhodes
  • Yael R. Glazer
  • Jan Mertens
  • Ronnie Belmans
  • Emily Beagle

They have contributed to numerous publication venues, with the most frequent outlets being:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Applied Energy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Progress in Energy
  • The Electricity Journal

Their recent papers include:

  • "Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas", 2021, Energy Research & Social Science
  • "Understanding the impact of non-synchronous wind and solar generation on grid stability and identifying mitigation pathways", 2020, Applied Energy
  • "Carbon capture and utilization: More than hiding CO2 for some time", 2023, Joule
  • "Quantifying the impact of residential space heating electrification on the Texas electric grid", 2021, Applied Energy
  • "The economic and reliability impacts of grid-scale storage in a high penetration renewable energy system", 2021, Advances in Applied Energy

In addition to journal publications, Michael E. Webber has authored books published by Yale University Press and Fordham University Press eBooks, including "Thirst for Power" (2020) and "New Deal Fat Cats" (2020).

Michael E. Webber was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2014.

Best Publications

  • On-Line Building Energy Optimization Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Elena Mocanu;Decebal Constantin Mocanu;Phuong H. Nguyen;Antonio Liotta

  • Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas

    Joshua W. Busby;Kyri Baker;Morgan D. Bazilian;Alex Q. Gilbert

  • Wasted food, wasted energy: the embedded energy in food waste in the United States.

    Amanda D. Cuéllar;Michael E. Webber

  • The energy-water nexus in Texas

    Ashlynn S. Stillwell;Carey W. King;Michael E. Webber;Ian J. Duncan

  • Water intensity of transportation.

    Carey W. King;Michael E. Webber

  • Clustering analysis of residential electricity demand profiles

    Joshua D. Rhodes;Wesley J. Cole;Charles R. Upshaw;Thomas F. Edgar

  • The impacts of storing solar energy in the home to reduce reliance on the utility

    Robert L. Fares;Michael E. Webber

  • Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas

    Amanda D Cuéllar;Michael E Webber

  • A review of four case studies assessing the potential for hydrogen penetration of the future energy system

    Andrew Chapman;Kenshi Itaoka;Katsuhiko Hirose;F. Todd Davidson

  • Evaluating the energy consumed for water use in the United States

    Kelly T Sanders;Michael E Webber

  • Energy recovery from wastewater treatment plants in the United States: A case study of the energy-water nexus

    Ashlynn S. Stillwell;David C. Hoppock;Michael E. Webber

  • Ammonia Monitoring Near 1.5 mum with Diode-Laser Absorption Sensors.

    Michael E. Webber;Douglas S. Baer;Ronald K. Hanson

  • In situ combustion measurements of CO, CO2, H2O and temperature using diode laser absorption sensors

    Michael E. Webber;Jian Wang;Scott T. Sanders;Douglas S. Baer

  • Fiber-amplifier-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy with near-infrared tunable diode lasers

    Michael E. Webber;Michael Pushkarsky;C. Kumar N. Patel

  • Thirst for energy

    Carey W. King;Ashlynn S. Holman;Michael E. Webber

  • Evaluating rotational inertia as a component of grid reliability with high penetrations of variable renewable energy

    Samuel C. Johnson;Dimitri J. Papageorgiou;Dharik S. Mallapragada;Thomas A. Deetjen

  • In situ combustion measurements of CO2 by use of a distributed-feedback diode-laser sensor near 2.0-μm

    Michael E. Webber;Suhong Kim;Scott T. Sanders;Douglas S. Baer

  • A Compilation of Design for Environment Principles and Guidelines

    Cassandra Telenko;Carolyn C. Seepersad;Michael E. Webber

  • Diode-laser absorption measurements of CO2, H2O, N2O, and NH3 near 2.0 μm

    R. M. Mihalcea;Michael Webber;D. S. Baer;R. K. Hanson

  • Understanding the impact of non-synchronous wind and solar generation on grid stability and identifying mitigation pathways

    Samuel C. Johnson;Joshua D. Rhodes;Michael E. Webber

  • Can switching fuels save water? A life cycle quantification of freshwater consumption for Texas coal-and natural gas-fired electricity

    Emily A Grubert;Fred C Beach;Michael E Webber

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald K. Hanson
Ronald K. Hanson Stanford University
Gary T. Rochelle
Gary T. Rochelle The University of Texas at Austin
Carolyn Conner Seepersad
Carolyn Conner Seepersad The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas F. Edgar
Thomas F. Edgar The University of Texas at Austin
Rodney S. Ruoff
Rodney S. Ruoff Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology
David T. Allen
David T. Allen The University of Texas at Austin
Wesley J. Cole
Wesley J. Cole National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Frank K. Tittel
Frank K. Tittel Rice University
Phuong H. Nguyen
Phuong H. Nguyen Eindhoven University of Technology
Christopher J. Ellison
Christopher J. Ellison University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Webber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles