World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mehmet Zahmakiran

Mehmet Zahmakiran

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 47 15777 14235 49 48 92 6758

Mehmet Zahmakiran publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mehmet Zahmakiran between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mehmet Zahmakiran published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2012. 10 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2012. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
2005 2025

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mehmet Zahmakiran: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 8
2010 9
2011 4
2012 12
2013 1
2014 7
2015 6
2016 5
2017 7
2018 8
2019 2
2020 5
2021 2
2022 4
2023 3
2024 8
2025 2
Total 97
Download as CSV

Mehmet Zahmakiran publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Zahmakiran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 92 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302 92
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mehmet Zahmakiran D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mehmet Zahmakiran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776 47
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mehmet Zahmakiran is primarily affiliated with Yüzüncü Yıl University in Turkey. Their research spans key areas in materials science and chemistry, with a particular focus on materials chemistry, renewable energy sustainability, organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and catalysis. Their work covers a range of topics, including hydrogen storage and materials, ammonia synthesis and nitrogen reduction, nanomaterials for catalytic reactions, electrocatalysts for energy conversion, hybrid renewable energy systems, analytical chemistry and sensors, and advanced photocatalysis techniques.

Their frequent coauthors include Mehmet Yurderi, Ahmet Bulut, Gülşah Saydan Kanberoğlu, Tuba Top, and Murat Kaya.

Mehmet Zahmakiran has published multiple papers, with a selection including:

  • Complete Dehydrogenation of Hydrazine Borane on Manganese Oxide Nanorod-Supported Ni@Ir Core-Shell Nanoparticles (2020, Inorganic Chemistry)
  • Silica supported ternary NiRuPt alloy nanoparticles: Highly efficient heterogeneous catalyst for H2 generation via selective decomposition of hydrous hydrazine in alkaline solution (2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy)
  • An electrochemical sensing platform with a molecularly imprinted polymer based on chitosan-stabilized metal@metal-organic frameworks for topotecan detection (2023, Microchimica Acta)
  • Ruthenium Nanoparticles Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide: Efficient Catalyst for the Catalytic Reduction of Cr(VI) in the Presence of Amine-Boranes (2020, ChemistrySelect)
  • Ruthenium(0) nanoparticles stabilized by metal-organic framework as an efficient electrocatalyst for borohydride oxidation reaction (2020, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy)

The scientist has contributed extensively to the following publication venues:

  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • ChemistrySelect
  • Materials Chemistry and Physics
  • Applied Organometallic Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry

Their work is distributed mainly within the broader fields of materials science and chemistry, with 19 and 18 publications in these fields respectively. More detailed subfields reflect expertise in materials chemistry with 16 publications, renewable energy sustainability with 8, organic chemistry with 8, inorganic chemistry with 7, and catalysis with 6.

Best Publications

  • Metal nanoparticles in liquid phase catalysis; from recent advances to future goals

    Mehmet Zahmakıran;Saim Özkar

  • Hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of sodium borohydride using Ru(0) nanoclusters as catalyst

    Saim Ozkar;M Zahmakiran

  • Palladium nanoparticles supported on amine-functionalized SiO2 for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction

    Metin Celebi;Mehmet Yurderi;Ahmet Bulut;Murat Kaya

  • Ruthenium(0) nanoclusters stabilized by a Nanozeolite framework: isolable, reusable, and green catalyst for the hydrogenation of neat aromatics under mild conditions with the unprecedented catalytic activity and lifetime.

    Mehmet Zahmakıran;Yalçın Tonbul;Saim Özkar

  • Water soluble laurate-stabilized ruthenium(0) nanoclusters catalyst for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane: High activity and long lifetime

    Feyyaz Durap;Mehmet Zahmakıran;Saim Özkar

  • Pd-MnOx nanoparticles dispersed on amine-grafted silica: Highly efficient nanocatalyst for hydrogen production from additive-free dehydrogenation of formic acid under mild conditions

    Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Yurderi;Yasar Karatas;Mehmet Zahmakiran

  • Zeolite framework stabilized rhodium(0) nanoclusters catalyst for the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane in air: Outstanding catalytic activity, reusability and lifetime

    Mehmet Zahmakıran;Saim Özkar

  • Zeolite-confined ruthenium(0) nanoclusters catalyst: record catalytic activity, reusability, and lifetime in hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride.

    Mehmet Zahmakiran;Saim Özkar

  • Carbon supported trimetallic PdNiAg nanoparticles as highly active, selective and reusable catalyst in the formic acid decomposition

    Mehmet Yurderi;Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Zahmakiran;Murat Kaya

  • Water soluble laurate-stabilized rhodium(0) nanoclusters catalyst with unprecedented catalytic lifetime in the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia-borane

    Feyyaz Durap;Mehmet Zahmakıran;Saim Özkar

  • Dimethylammonium hexanoate stabilized rhodium(0) nanoclusters identified as true heterogeneous catalysts with the highest observed activity in the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane.

    Mehmet Zahmakiran;Saim Özkar

  • Carbon dispersed copper-cobalt alloy nanoparticles: A cost-effective heterogeneous catalyst with exceptional performance in the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia-borane

    Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Yurderi;İlknur Efecan Ertas;Metin Celebi

  • Ruthenium(0) nanoparticles stabilized by metal-organic framework (ZIF-8): Highly efficient catalyst for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane and transfer hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons using dimethylamine-borane as hydrogen source

    Mehmet Yurderi;Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Zahmakiran;Mehmet Gülcan

  • Zeolite confined copper(0) nanoclusters as cost-effective and reusable catalyst in hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane

    Mehmet Zahmakıran;Feyyaz Durap;Saim Özkar

  • Iridium nanoparticles stabilized by metal organic frameworks (IrNPs@ZIF-8): synthesis, structural properties and catalytic performance

    Mehmet Zahmakiran

  • PdAu-MnOx nanoparticles supported on amine-functionalized SiO2 for the room temperature dehydrogenation of formic acid in the absence of additives

    Yasar Karatas;Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Yurderi;Ilknur Efecan Ertas

  • Supported copper–copper oxide nanoparticles as active, stable and low-cost catalyst in the methanolysis of ammonia–borane for chemical hydrogen storage

    Mehmet Yurderi;Ahmet Bulut;İlknur Efecan Ertas;Mehmet Zahmakiran

  • Copper(0) nanoparticles supported on silica-coated cobalt ferrite magnetic particles: cost effective catalyst in the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane with an exceptional reusability performance.

    Murat Kaya;Mehmet Zahmakiran;Saim Özkar;Mürvet Volkan

  • MnOx-Promoted PdAg Alloy Nanoparticles for the Additive-Free Dehydrogenation of Formic Acid at Room Temperature

    Ahmet Bulut;Mehmet Yurderi;Yasar Karatas;Zafer Say

  • Water dispersible acetate stabilized ruthenium(0) nanoclusters as catalyst for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of sodium borohyride

    Mehmet Zahmakıran;Saim Özkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Saim Özkar
Saim Özkar Middle East Technical University
Bruno Chaudret
Bruno Chaudret Paul Sabatier University
Karine Philippot
Karine Philippot Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Tamer Uyar
Tamer Uyar Cornell University
Asli Celebioglu
Asli Celebioglu Cornell University
Richard G. Finke
Richard G. Finke Colorado State University
Diogo M.F. Santos
Diogo M.F. Santos Instituto Superior Técnico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and career options. For those interested in legal aspects tied to chemical industries or patent cases, exploring degrees for paralegals can provide valuable skills and stable career paths. These programs often emphasize understanding regulatory and compliance issues relevant to chemistry professionals.

For graduates keen on combining science with sales, becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative is an attractive option. Understanding how much do pharmaceutical reps make provides insight into the earning potential and motivations within this dynamic career segment.

Alternatively, pursuing how to become a pharmacist is a natural extension for many chemistry graduates. This career demands specialized education but offers extensive opportunities in healthcare, research, and community service.

For those fascinated by forensic applications of chemistry, learning how to become an autopsy technician outlines a less conventional yet impactful pathway involving biological and chemical analysis skills.

Best Scientists Citing Mehmet Zahmakiran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles