World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 32 3135 2944 1064 944 337 4810

Mark Glauser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Glauser between 1984 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Glauser published across 41 years, from 1984 to 2024, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2006. 10 of the 345 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2006. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications
1984 2024

345 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Glauser: publications per year, 1984 to 2024
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 3
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 5
1992 5
1993 6
1994 6
1995 2
1996 8
1997 3
1998 7
1999 10
2000 1
2001 6
2002 6
2003 10
2004 14
2005 22
2006 23
2007 15
2008 15
2009 10
2010 19
2011 15
2012 15
2013 20
2014 9
2015 11
2016 10
2017 19
2018 9
2019 10
2020 9
2021 5
2022 3
2023 4
2024 6
Total 345
Download as CSV

Mark Glauser publications per year - data summary

  • Mark Glauser, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Syracuse University, has 345 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1984 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1984 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2006, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1984, 1989 and 2000, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1986 and 1988).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.1 per year counting only the 38 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 27 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1984-1997: 42 publications (3.0 per year); 1998-2011: 173 publications (12.4 per year); 2012-2024: 130 publications (10.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mark Glauser publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Glauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 337–346 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 337 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58 337
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Glauser publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 47–56 to 659+ publications.
  • Mark Glauser, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Syracuse University, records 337 publications - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Mark Glauser, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 217–226 publications range, and Mark Glauser ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 147–156 publications, holding 155 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 46% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 197–206 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 659 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mark Glauser D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Glauser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144 32
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Glauser D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 64 ranges running from 30 to 93+ D-Index.
  • Mark Glauser, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Syracuse University, records 32 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Mark Glauser, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Mark Glauser ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 189 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 45 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Best Publications

  • The proper orthogonal decomposition of pressure fluctuations surrounding a turbulent jet

    Roger E.A. Arndt;D.F. Long;M.N Glauser

  • Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: complementary techniques for identifying structure

    J. P. Bonnet;D. R. Cole;J. Delville;M. N. Glauser

  • Examination of large-scale structures in a turbulent plane mixing layer. Part 1. Proper orthogonal decomposition

    J. Delville;L. Ukeiley;L. Ukeiley;L. Cordier;J. P. Bonnet

  • Coherent Structures in the Axisymmetric Turbulent Jet Mixing Layer

    Mark N. Glauser;Stewart J. Leib;William K. George

  • Towards Practical Flow Sensing and Control via POD and LSE Based Low-Dimensional Tools

    Unknown

  • Collaborative testing of eddy structure identification methods in free turbulent shear flows

    J. P. Bonnet;J. Delville;M. N. Glauser;R. A. Antonia

  • On spectral linear stochastic estimation

    C. E. Tinney;F. Coiffet;J. Delville;A. M. Hall

  • Computational modeling of effects of thermal plume adjacent to the body on the indoor airflow and particle transport

    M. Salmanzadeh;M. Salmanzadeh;Gh. Zahedi;G. Ahmadi;D.R. Marr

  • Proportional Closed-Loop Feedback Control of Flow Separation

    Unknown

  • Examination of large-scale structures in a turbulent plane mixing layer. Part 2. Dynamical systems model

    L. Ukeiley;L. Cordier;Remi Manceau;J. Delville

  • Low-dimensional characteristics of a transonic jet. Part 2. Estimate and far-field prediction

    C. E. Tinney;L. S. Ukeiley;M. N. Glauser

  • Orthogonal Decomposition of the Axisymmetric Jet Mixing Layer Including Azimuthal Dependence

    M. N. Glauser;W. K. George

  • Low-dimensional characteristics of a transonic jet. Part 1. Proper orthogonal decomposition

    Charles E Tinney;M. N. Glauser;L. S. Ukeiley

  • An application of the stochastic estimation to the jet mixing layer

    Daniel R. Cole;Mark N. Glauser;Yann G. Guezennec

  • Low-Dimensional Approach for Reconstruction of Airfoil Data via Compressive Sensing

    Zhe Bai;Thakshila Wimalajeewa;Zachary Berger;Guannan Wang

  • Application of multipoint measurements for flow characterization

    Mark N. Glauser;William K. George

  • Eddy Structure Identification in Free Turbulent Shear Flows

    Unknown

  • Feedback Control of Separated Flows

    Unknown

  • Application of POD on time-resolved schlieren in supersonic multi-stream rectangular jets

    Unknown

  • Whither turbulence and big data in the 21st century

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence Ukeiley
Lawrence Ukeiley University of Florida
William K. George
William K. George Imperial College London
Bernd R. Noack
Bernd R. Noack Harbin Institute of Technology
Datta V. Gaitonde
Datta V. Gaitonde The Ohio State University
William S. Saric
William S. Saric Texas A&M University
Goodarz Ahmadi
Goodarz Ahmadi Clarkson University
Pramod K. Varshney
Pramod K. Varshney Syracuse University
Peter Jordan
Peter Jordan University of Poitiers
Naibo Jiang
Naibo Jiang The Ohio State University
Luciano Castillo
Luciano Castillo Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring fbi profiler salary opportunities reveals the significant value of specialized education in related fields. While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering provide strong technical and analytical foundations, students may also consider interdisciplinary careers that combine engineering principles with behavioral sciences.

For those interested in helping professions or human behavior, pursuing different types of counseling degrees can complement an engineering background, especially in organizational or rehabilitation settings. Understanding degrees in counseling helps students identify the right pathways aligned with their career goals.

When choosing an educational program, it's important to evaluate options like accredited easiest counseling degree programs, which offer flexible, streamlined paths without compromising quality. These programs can be ideal for engineers looking to expand their skills efficiently.

Additionally, accelerated graduate programs such as the accelerated bcba program online provide fast-tracked routes for specialization. Combining such credentials with an engineering degree can open unique career pathways in tech-driven human factors and behavior analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Glauser

Recently Published Articles