World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
4933
World Ranking
8149
National Ranking
511

Mark Gee publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 168 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Mark Gee D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Gee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Progress towards standardisation of ball cratering

    M.G. Gee;A. Gant;I. Hutchings;R. Bethke

  • Wear mechanisms in abrasion and erosion of WC/Co and related hardmetals

    M.G. Gee;A. Gant;B. Roebuck

  • Comparison of EBSD and conventional methods of grain size measurement of hardmetals

    K.P. Mingard;K.P. Mingard;B. Roebuck;E.G. Bennett;M.G. Gee

  • Use of FIB/SEM to assess the tribo-corrosion of WC/Co hardmetals in model single point abrasion experiments

    A.J. Gant;M.G. Gee;D.D. Gohil;H.G. Jones

  • The formation of aluminium hydroxide in the sliding wear of alumina

    M.G. Gee

  • Rotating wheel abrasion of WC/Co hardmetals

    A.J. Gant;M.G. Gee;B. Roebuck

  • Results from an interlaboratory exercise to validate the micro-scale abrasion test

    M.G. Gee;A.J. Gant;I.M. Hutchings;Y. Kusano

  • Effect of grain size on the micro-tribological behavior of pure titanium processed by high-pressure torsion

    Chuan Ting Wang;Nong Gao;Mark G. Gee;Robert J.K. Wood

  • Low load multiple scratch tests of ceramics and hard metals

    M.G Gee

  • The evaluation of tribo-corrosion synergy for WC-Co hardmetals in low stress abrasion

    A.J Gant;M.G Gee;A.T May

  • A new friction measurement system for the frictional component of touch

    M.G. Gee;P. Tomlins;A. Calver;R.H. Darling

  • The European nanometrology landscape

    Richard K Leach;Robert Boyd;Theresa Burke;Hans-Ulrich Danzebrink

  • Grain size effect on wear resistance of WC-Co cemented carbides under different tribological conditions

    Haibin Wang;Haibin Wang;Mark Gee;Qingfan Qiu;Hannah Zhang

  • The combined effect of speed and humidity on the wear and friction of silicon nitride

    M.G. Gee;D. Butterfield

  • Wear of tungsten carbide–cobalt hardmetals and hot isostatically pressed high speed steels under dry abrasive conditions

    A.J. Gant;M.G. Gee

  • A Novel Surface Texture Shape for Directional Friction Control

    Ping Lu;Robert J. K. Wood;Mark G. Gee;Ling Wang

  • Microabrasion of WC-Co hardmetals in corrosive media

    A.J Gant;M.G Gee;A.T May

  • Processing of an ultrafine-grained titanium by high-pressure torsion: an evaluation of the wear properties with and without a TiN coating.

    Chuan Ting Wang;Nong Gao;Mark G. Gee;Robert J.K. Wood

  • Abrasion of tungsten carbide hardmetals using hard counterfaces

    A.J. Gant;M.G. Gee

  • Wear modes in slurry jet erosion of tungsten carbide hardmetals: Their relationship with microstructure and mechanical properties

    A.J. Gant;M.G. Gee

  • High resolution characterisation of tribochemical films on alumina.

    M.G. Gee;N.M. Jennett

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian M. Hutchings
Ian M. Hutchings University of Cambridge
Robert J.K. Wood
Robert J.K. Wood University of Southampton
Terence G. Langdon
Terence G. Langdon University of Southern California
Philip J. Withers
Philip J. Withers University of Manchester
Kenneth Holmberg
Kenneth Holmberg VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Xiaoyan Song
Xiaoyan Song Beijing University of Technology
George E. Thompson
George E. Thompson University of Manchester
Nong Gao
Nong Gao University of Southampton
Dirk Poelman
Dirk Poelman Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities and academic pathways. Many students now consider the flexibility and affordability of pursuing online degrees to fast-track their professional goals.

A popular choice for tech-driven fields is an online project management degree. This program helps students build leadership and organizational skills highly valued in many industries, including engineering and construction. If you’re wondering if is a bachelor degree in project management worth it, recent trends suggest strong job demand and competitive salaries make it a worthwhile investment.

For those interested in digital innovation, an online ux design degree prepares graduates to create intuitive user experiences for web and mobile applications—a crucial skill in today’s technology landscape. Additionally, real estate degree programs offer pathways for engineering students interested in property development, urban planning, or sustainable infrastructure.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you align your technical background with emerging opportunities across various dynamic industries.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Gee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles