World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9035 8439 4792 4361 128 9853

Mark A. Reger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark A. Reger between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark A. Reger published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 9 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 11 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1983 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark A. Reger: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 11
2005 3
2006 10
2007 4
2008 8
2009 6
2010 8
2011 6
2012 7
2013 6
2014 4
2015 8
2016 3
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 13
2021 10
2022 5
2023 8
2024 5
2025 4
Total 159
Download as CSV

Mark A. Reger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Reger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 128
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark A. Reger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Reger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

Mark A. Reger is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and is recognized for research primarily in the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology. Their scholarly contributions encompass several subfields including social psychology, general health professions, health, and emergency medicine.

Their work addresses key topics such as suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, posttraumatic stress disorder research, grief, bereavement, and mental health, health policy implementation science, gun ownership and violence research, and digital mental health interventions.

Frequent publication venues where Mark A. Reger's work appears include:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • Psychiatric Services
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • Psychological Services
  • Health Services Research

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Mark A. Reger are:

  • "Suicide Mortality and Coronavirus Disease 2019-A Perfect Storm?" (2020) published in JAMA Psychiatry
  • "COVID-19, Mental Health, and Suicide Risk Among Health Care Workers" (2020) published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
  • Additional papers include works published in 2020 and 2021 addressing suicide risk in military populations and veterans health

Collaborations have been frequent with several coauthors, including Sarah P. Carter, Sara J. Landes, Heather M. Gebhardt, Ian H. Stanley, and Sasha M. Rojas, indicating ongoing partnerships within mental health research communities.

Mark A. Reger's work is noted for the volume of publications in clinical and social psychological research applied to health services and emergency medicine contexts, often with a focus on suicide prevention and mental health treatment access.

The researcher has been recognized as a Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration, underscoring a role in bridging public health policy and research.

Best Publications

  • Suicide Mortality and Coronavirus Disease 2019-A Perfect Storm?

    Mark A. Reger;Ian H. Stanley;Thomas E. Joiner

  • Intranasal insulin improves cognition and modulates β-amyloid in early AD

    M. A. Reger;G. S. Watson;P. S. Green;C. W. Wilkinson

  • Effects of intranasal insulin on cognition in memory-impaired older adults: modulation by APOE genotype.

    M.A. Reger;M.A. Reger;G.S. Watson;G.S. Watson;W.H. Frey;W.H. Frey;L.D. Baker;L.D. Baker

  • Effects of β-hydroxybutyrate on cognition in memory-impaired adults

    Mark A. Reger;Samuel T. Henderson;Cathy Hale;Brenna Cholerton;Brenna Cholerton

  • Intranasal Insulin Administration Dose-Dependently Modulates Verbal Memory and Plasma Amyloid-β in Memory-Impaired Older Adults

    Mark A. Reger;Mark A. Reger;G. Stennis Watson;G. Stennis Watson;Pattie S. Green;Pattie S. Green;Laura D. Baker;Laura D. Baker

  • The impact of reported direct and indirect killing on mental health symptoms in Iraq war veterans.

    Shira Maguen;Barbara A. Lucenko;Mark A. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm

  • The relationship between neuropsychological functioning and driving ability in dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Mark A. Reger;Robert K. Welsh;G. Stennis Watson;Brenna Cholerton

  • A meta-analysis of the neuropsychological sequelae of HIV infection.

    Mark Reger;Robert Welsh;Jill Razani;David J. Martin

  • Suicide risk among 1.3 million veterans who were on active duty during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

    Han K. Kang;Tim A. Bullman;Derek J. Smolenski;Nancy A. Skopp

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of Internet- and computer-based cognitive-behavioral treatments for anxiety

    Mark A. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm

  • Risk of Suicide Among US Military Service Members Following Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom Deployment and Separation From the US Military

    Mark A. Reger;Derek J. Smolenski;Nancy A. Skopp;Melinda J. Metzger-Abamukang

  • Killing in combat, mental health symptoms, and suicidal ideation in Iraq war veterans

    Shira Maguen;Shira Maguen;David D. Luxton;Nancy A. Skopp;Gregory A. Gahm

  • Randomized controlled trial of prolonged exposure using imaginal exposure vs. virtual reality exposure in active duty soldiers with deployment-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

    Greg M. Reger;Patricia Koenen-Woods;Kimberlee Zetocha;Derek J. Smolenski

  • Civilian Psychologists in an Army Culture: The Ethical Challenge of Cultural Competence

    Mark A. Reger;Joseph R. Etherage;Greg M. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm

  • Soldier attitudes about technology-based approaches to mental health care.

    Jaime A. B. Wilson;Kristin Onorati;Matt Mishkind;Mark A. Reger

  • Association between number of deployments to Iraq and mental health screening outcomes in US Army soldiers.

    Mark A. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm;Robert D. Swanson;Susan J. Duma

  • Department of Defense Suicide Event Report (DoDSER) Calendar Year 2010 Annual Report

    Derek J Smolensky;Mark A Reger;Nigel E Bush;Nancy A Skopp

  • Department of Defense Suicide Event Report (DoDSER) Calendar Year 2010 Annual Report

    Unknown

  • Insulin effects on CSF norepinephrine and cognition in Alzheimer's disease.

    G. Stennis Watson;G. Stennis Watson;Tanja Bernhardt;Mark A. Reger;Mark A. Reger;Brenna A. Cholerton;Brenna A. Cholerton

  • The impact of childhood abuse and combat‐related trauma on postdeployment adjustment

    April M. Fritch;Matt Mishkind;Mark A. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm

  • Association of Suicide Risk With Transition to Civilian Life Among US Military Service Members.

    Chandru Ravindran;Sybil W Morley;Brady M Stephens;Ian H Stanley

  • The role of intimate relationships, appraisals of military service, and gender on the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms following Iraq deployment.

    Nancy A. Skopp;Mark A. Reger;Greg M. Reger;Matthew C. Mishkind

  • Anger intensification with combat-related PTSD and depression comorbidity.

    Oscar I. Gonzalez;Raymond W. Novaco;Mark A. Reger;Gregory A. Gahm

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne Craft
Suzanne Craft Wake Forest University
Laura D. Baker
Laura D. Baker Wake Forest University
Gregory A. Gahm
Gregory A. Gahm Madigan Army Medical Center
Derek J. Smolenski
Derek J. Smolenski Defense Health Agency
Stephen R. Plymate
Stephen R. Plymate University of Washington
Sanjay Asthana
Sanjay Asthana University of Wisconsin–Madison
David D. Luxton
David D. Luxton University of Washington
William H. Frey
William H. Frey HealthPartners
Raymond P. Tucker
Raymond P. Tucker Louisiana State University
Ian H. Stanley
Ian H. Stanley Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online opens doors to a variety of career options in counseling, research, and human services. With flexible learning, students from across the country can access high-quality programs without relocating. Rankings such as the best psychology program rankings in Albany or the best psychology degree rankings in Arlington showcase institutions known for innovation, diverse faculty, and professional development opportunities.

Specialized areas like clinical psychology, educational psychology, and organizational psychology are available across states, including in the best psychology program rankings in California. Those seeking further inspiration may review the top psychology programs in Austin to compare key features, course options, and outcomes. By identifying accredited programs with strong support systems and practical opportunities, students can better prepare for dynamic career paths in both local and nationwide settings.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Reger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles