World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mario Meglio

Mario Meglio

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
7460
World Ranking
8271
National Ranking
452

Mario Meglio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Meglio sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mario Meglio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario Meglio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mario Meglio was a researcher affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their academic work focused primarily on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health as subfields.

The research topics explored by Mario Meglio included:

  • Spinal Hematomas and Complications
  • Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

Among the scholarly outputs, one recent publication was notable for its focus on post-surgical outcomes. This paper, published in 2023, was titled "Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes in adults surgically treated for intramedullary spinal cord tumor" and appeared in the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

Frequent collaborators in their research included:

  • Tommaso Tufo
  • Eleonora Dal Grande
  • Giuseppina Bevacqua
  • Ines Di Muccio
  • Beatrice Cioni

The venues for Mario Meglio's publications were limited but included Frontiers in Psychology, reflecting a cross-disciplinary approach that could intersect clinical medicine and psychological outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

    Krishna Kumar;Rod S. Taylor;Line Jacques;Sam Eldabe

  • The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation.

    Krishna Kumar;Rod S Taylor;Line Jacques;Sam Eldabe

  • Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex

    V Di Lazzaro;A Oliviero;M Meglio;B Cioni

  • The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

    V. Di Lazzaro;F. Pilato;M. Dileone;P. Profice

  • Spinal cord stimulation in management of chronic pain. A 9-year experience.

    Mario Meglio;Beatrice Cioni;Gian Franco Rossi

  • Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial)

    Andrea Manca;Krishna Kumar;Rod S. Taylor;Line Jacques

  • Advances in diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

    Nicola Nicola Montano;Giulio Conforti;Rina Di Bonaventura;Mario Meglio

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Conventional Medical Management: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (PROCESS Study)

    Krishna Kumar;Richard North;Rod Taylor;Mark Sculpher

  • Avoiding Complications From Spinal Cord Stimulation: Practical Recommendations From an International Panel of Experts

    Krishna Kumar;Eric Buchser;Bengt Linderoth;Mario Meglio

  • Descending spinal cord volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex leg area in conscious humans

    Di Lazzaro;A Oliviero;P Profice;Mario Meglio

  • Pain control and improvement of peripheral blood flow following epidural spinal cord stimulation: Case report

    Mario Meglio;Beatrice Cioni;Antonio Dal Lago;Mario De Santis

  • Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of paraplegic pain

    Beatrice Cioni;Mario Meglio;Luigi Pentimalli;Massimiliano Visocchi

  • Cost‐Effectiveness and Cost‐Utility Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Results From the PRECISE Study

    Furio Zucco;Roberta Ciampichini;Angelo Lavano;Amedeo Costantini

  • Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability in epileptic patients

    Di Lazzaro;A Oliviero;F Pilato;E Saturno

  • Effect of spinal cord stimulation on spontaneous and stress-induced angina and ‘ischemia-like’ ST-segment depression in patients with cardiac syndrome X

    Gaetano A. Lanza;Alfonso Sestito;Gregory A. Sgueglia;Fabio Infusino

  • Olfactory groove meningioma: report of 99 cases surgically treated at the Catholic University School of Medicine, Rome.

    Roberto Pallini;Eduardo Fernandez;Liverana Lauretti;Francesco Doglietto

  • Vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsies in different age, aetiology and duration

    Gabriella Colicchio;Domenico Policicchio;Giulia Barbati;Elisabetta Cesaroni

  • The psychological assessment of candidates for spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.

    Diego Beltrutti;Aldo Lamberto;Giancarlo Barolat;Stephen P. Bruehl

  • Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of postherpetic pain.

    M Meglio;B Cioni;A Prezioso;G Talamonti

  • Long-term follow-up of patients with cardiac syndrome X treated by spinal cord stimulation

    Gregory Angelo Sgueglia;Alfonso Sestito;Antonella Spinelli;Beatrice Cioni

Frequent Co-Authors

Michele Dileone
Michele Dileone CEU San Pablo University
Fabio Pilato
Fabio Pilato Università Campus Bio-Medico
Anna Rita Bentivoglio
Anna Rita Bentivoglio Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
P.A. Tonali
P.A. Tonali Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Filippo Crea
Filippo Crea Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
V. Di Lazzaro
V. Di Lazzaro Università Campus Bio-Medico
Paolo Profice
Paolo Profice Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Alfonso Fasano
Alfonso Fasano University Health Network
Antonio Oliviero
Antonio Oliviero Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de Toledo
Flavio Nobili
Flavio Nobili University of Genoa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in neuroscience can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and technology. If you’re interested in job opportunities after your studies, it’s helpful to explore majors that make the most money. Neuroscience often ranks highly due to growing demand in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and data-driven research roles.

Many students look for accessible and budget-friendly options. With online colleges that offer financial aid, pursuing a neuroscience-related degree is more affordable than ever. Financial aid helps reduce costs, making higher education attainable without overwhelming debt.

If you want to enhance your qualifications quickly, you might consider certificates I can get online. These certifications can boost your resume and may lead to higher salaries or specialized roles in neuroscience-adjacent fields.

Not sure where to start? Explore various online degree programs that suit your interests and schedule. These programs offer flexibility and the chance to tailor your learning to your chosen career pathway in the neurosciences or beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mario Meglio

Recently Published Articles