World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5669
World Ranking
13005
National Ranking
63

Luiz F. M. Vieira publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luiz F. M. Vieira sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Luiz F. M. Vieira D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luiz F. M. Vieira sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luiz F. M. Vieira is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais in Brazil. Their research spans multiple areas within Computer Science and Engineering, contributing extensively to the understanding and development of networking and communication systems.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

They have worked notably in several subfields, such as:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Water Science and Technology

Key research topics covered by Luiz F. M. Vieira are diverse, with a focus on:

  • Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
  • Caching and Content Delivery
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • Fast Packet Processing with eBPF and XDP, 2020, ACM Computing Surveys
  • CAPTAIN: A data collection algorithm for underwater optical-acoustic sensor networks, 2020, Computer Networks
  • Underwater Sensor Networks for Smart Disaster Management, 2020, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine
  • UW-SEEDEX: A Pseudorandom-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • OpenFlow data planes performance evaluation, 2021, Performance Evaluation

Luiz F. M. Vieira has published frequently in several venues, including:

  • Computer Networks
  • Telecommunication Systems
  • Wireless Networks
  • 2021 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist has collaborated repeatedly with several co-authors, such as:

  • Marcos A. M. Vieira
  • José Augusto M. Nacif
  • Alex Borges Vieira
  • Eduardo Paulino Júnior
  • Antônio A. F. Loureiro

Best Publications

  • Visible Light Communication: Concepts, Applications and Challenges

    Luiz Eduardo Mendes Matheus;Alex Borges Vieira;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Marcos A. M. Vieira

  • Geographic and Opportunistic Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks

    Rodolfo Wanderson Lima Coutinho;Azzedine Boukerche;Luiz Filipe Menezes Vieira;Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro

  • Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks

    Uichin Lee;Paul Wang;Youngtae Noh;Luiz F. M. Vieira

  • Localization with Dive'N'Rise (DNR) beacons for underwater acoustic sensor networks

    Melike Erol;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Mario Gerla

  • AUV-Aided Localization for Underwater Sensor Networks

    M. Erol;L.F.M. Vieira;M. Gerla

  • The Meandering Current Mobility Model and its Impact on Underwater Mobile Sensor Networks

    A. Caruso;F. Paparella;L.F.M. Vieira;M. Erol

  • HydroCast: Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks

    Youngtae Noh;Uichin Lee;Saewoom Lee;Paul Wang

  • Fast Packet Processing with eBPF and XDP: Concepts, Code, Challenges, and Applications

    Marcos A. M. Vieira;Matheus S. Castanho;Racyus D. G. Pacífico;Elerson R. S. Santos

  • GEDAR: Geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with Depth Adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks

    Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho;Azzedine Boukerche;Luiz Filipe M. Vieira;Antonio A. F. Loureiro

  • Multi Stage Underwater Sensor Localization Using Mobile Beacons

    M. Erol;L. Vieira;A. Caruso;F. Paparella

  • Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A New Challenge for Topology Control–Based Systems

    Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho;Azzedine Boukerche;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Antonio A. F. Loureiro

  • Programmable Networks—From Software-Defined Radio to Software-Defined Networking

    Daniel F. Macedo;Dorgival Guedes;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Marcos A. M. Vieira

  • Design guidelines for opportunistic routing in underwater networks

    Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho;Azzedine Boukerche;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Antonio A. F. Loureiro

  • Analysis of Aloha Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

    Luiz Filipe M. Vieira;Jiejun Kong;Uichin Lee;Mario Gerla

  • Scheduling nodes in wireless sensor networks: a Voronoi approach

    M.A.M. Viera;L.F.M. Viera;L.B. Ruiz;A.A.F. Loureiro

  • Phero-trail: a bio-inspired location service for mobile underwater sensor networks

    Luiz Filipe M Vieira;Uichin Lee;Mario Gerla

  • DCR: Depth-Controlled Routing protocol for underwater sensor networks

    Rodolfo W. L. Coutinho;Luiz F. M. Vieira;Antonio A. F. Loureiro

  • A novel void node recovery paradigm for long-term underwater sensor networks

    Rodolfo W.L. Coutinho;Azzedine Boukerche;Luiz F.M. Vieira;Antonio A.F. Loureiro

  • Performance and trade-offs of opportunistic routing in underwater networks

    Luiz Filipe M. Vieira

  • SewerSnort: A Drifting Sensor for In-situ Sewer Gas Monitoring

    Jihyoung Kim;Jung Soo Lim;Jonathan Friedman;Uichin Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio A. F. Loureiro
Antonio A. F. Loureiro Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Azzedine Boukerche
Azzedine Boukerche University of Ottawa
Mario Gerla
Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles
Uichin Lee
Uichin Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Omprakash Gnawali
Omprakash Gnawali University of Houston
Archan Misra
Archan Misra Singapore Management University
Mario F. M. Campos
Mario F. M. Campos Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Mani Srivastava
Mani Srivastava University of California, Los Angeles
Jun-Hong Cui
Jun-Hong Cui Jilin University
Bhaskar Krishnamachari
Bhaskar Krishnamachari University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your expertise beyond Computer Science, there are several online STEM degrees to consider. One popular choice is a fast track computer science degree, which lets you earn your qualifications in less time without sacrificing quality or career potential.

Students looking for interdisciplinary opportunities may choose to pursue an environmental engineer degree online. This pathway can help you apply computing skills to urgent global sustainability challenges.

Engineering fields also offer promising online options. Understanding the mechanical engineering degree online cost lets you compare programs and plan your finances effectively, ensuring you get quality education within your budget.

For those with a passion for the sciences, the best online physics degree programs are flexible routes for focusing on research, teaching, or innovative tech roles.

Exploring online degrees in related fields can open unique career pathways and allow you to tailor your educational journey to your personal interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Luiz F. M. Vieira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles