| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology and Biochemistry | 61 | 11497 | 4965 | 224 | 11483 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Lucille S. Hurley between 1952 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucille S. Hurley published across 69 years, from 1952 to 2020, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 1981. 1 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.
235 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1952 | 2 |
| 1953 | 0 |
| 1954 | 1 |
| 1955 | 1 |
| 1956 | 1 |
| 1957 | 0 |
| 1958 | 1 |
| 1959 | 3 |
| 1960 | 1 |
| 1961 | 3 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 3 |
| 1964 | 0 |
| 1965 | 2 |
| 1966 | 2 |
| 1967 | 1 |
| 1968 | 3 |
| 1969 | 3 |
| 1970 | 4 |
| 1971 | 7 |
| 1972 | 4 |
| 1973 | 3 |
| 1974 | 4 |
| 1975 | 5 |
| 1976 | 7 |
| 1977 | 10 |
| 1978 | 6 |
| 1979 | 7 |
| 1980 | 18 |
| 1981 | 20 |
| 1982 | 18 |
| 1983 | 14 |
| 1984 | 13 |
| 1985 | 18 |
| 1986 | 14 |
| 1987 | 11 |
| 1988 | 10 |
| 1989 | 6 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 1 |
| 1994 | 0 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| Total | 235 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucille S. Hurley sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 224 publications — 59th percentile
59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 8 | |
| 57–66 | 35 | |
| 67–76 | 106 | |
| 77–86 | 231 | |
| 87–96 | 413 | |
| 97–106 | 546 | |
| 107–116 | 704 | |
| 117–126 | 848 | |
| 127–136 | 980 | |
| 137–146 | 942 | |
| 147–156 | 969 | |
| 157–166 | 949 | |
| 167–176 | 951 | |
| 177–186 | 915 | |
| 187–196 | 787 | |
| 197–206 | 840 | |
| 207–216 | 733 | |
| 217–226 | 708 | 224 |
| 227–236 | 651 | |
| 237–246 | 605 | |
| 247–256 | 510 | |
| 257–266 | 524 | |
| 267–276 | 434 | |
| 277–286 | 417 | |
| 287–296 | 350 | |
| 297–306 | 363 | |
| 307–316 | 315 | |
| 317–326 | 296 | |
| 327–336 | 261 | |
| 337–346 | 240 | |
| 347–356 | 219 | |
| 357–366 | 196 | |
| 367–376 | 154 | |
| 377–386 | 161 | |
| 387–396 | 155 | |
| 397–406 | 145 | |
| 407–416 | 124 | |
| 417–426 | 112 | |
| 427–436 | 132 | |
| 437–446 | 116 | |
| 447–456 | 99 | |
| 457–466 | 81 | |
| 467–476 | 91 | |
| 477–486 | 80 | |
| 487–496 | 80 | |
| 497–506 | 59 | |
| 507–516 | 36 | |
| 517–526 | 46 | |
| 527–536 | 54 | |
| 537–546 | 44 | |
| 547–556 | 43 | |
| 557–566 | 43 | |
| 567–576 | 42 | |
| 577–586 | 25 | |
| 587–596 | 34 | |
| 597–606 | 23 | |
| 607–616 | 33 | |
| 617–626 | 31 | |
| 627–636 | 27 | |
| 637–646 | 25 | |
| 647–656 | 28 | |
| 657–666 | 34 | |
| 667–676 | 18 | |
| 677–686 | 16 | |
| 687–696 | 10 | |
| 697–706 | 12 | |
| 707–716 | 21 | |
| 717–726 | 12 | |
| 727–736 | 12 | |
| 737–746 | 10 | |
| 747–756 | 7 | |
| 757–766 | 13 | |
| 767–776 | 15 | |
| 777–786 | 13 | |
| 787–796 | 9 | |
| 797–806 | 9 | |
| 807–816 | 7 | |
| 817–826 | 4 | |
| 827–836 | 9 | |
| 837–846 | 7 | |
| 847–856 | 3 | |
| 857–866 | 5 | |
| 867–876 | 5 | |
| 877–886 | 11 | |
| 887–896 | 3 | |
| 897–906 | 4 | |
| 907–916 | 7 | |
| 917–926 | 5 | |
| 927–936 | 6 | |
| 937–946 | 6 | |
| 947–956 | 3 | |
| 957–966 | 7 | |
| 967–976 | 2 | |
| 977–986 | 2 | |
| 987–996 | 1 | |
| 997–1,006 | 5 | |
| 1,007–1,016 | 2 | |
| 1,017–1,026 | 2 | |
| 1,027 | 1 | |
| 1,028+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucille S. Hurley sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile
44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 80 | |
| 42–43 | 183 | |
| 44–45 | 316 | |
| 46–47 | 504 | |
| 48–49 | 718 | |
| 50–51 | 899 | |
| 52–53 | 1,025 | |
| 54–55 | 1,149 | |
| 56–57 | 1,235 | |
| 58–59 | 1,253 | |
| 60–61 | 1,162 | 61 |
| 62–63 | 1,130 | |
| 64–65 | 1,031 | |
| 66–67 | 897 | |
| 68–69 | 814 | |
| 70–71 | 714 | |
| 72–73 | 709 | |
| 74–75 | 596 | |
| 76–77 | 512 | |
| 78–79 | 473 | |
| 80–81 | 412 | |
| 82–83 | 373 | |
| 84–85 | 358 | |
| 86–87 | 285 | |
| 88–89 | 273 | |
| 90–91 | 227 | |
| 92–93 | 208 | |
| 94–95 | 193 | |
| 96–97 | 153 | |
| 98–99 | 157 | |
| 100–101 | 148 | |
| 102–103 | 120 | |
| 104–105 | 113 | |
| 106–107 | 100 | |
| 108–109 | 86 | |
| 110–111 | 67 | |
| 112–113 | 71 | |
| 114–115 | 73 | |
| 116–117 | 64 | |
| 118–119 | 53 | |
| 120–121 | 60 | |
| 122–123 | 54 | |
| 124–125 | 43 | |
| 126–127 | 38 | |
| 128–129 | 49 | |
| 130–131 | 26 | |
| 132–133 | 18 | |
| 134–135 | 23 | |
| 136–137 | 32 | |
| 138–139 | 32 | |
| 140–141 | 27 | |
| 142–143 | 19 | |
| 144–145 | 22 | |
| 146–147 | 12 | |
| 148–149 | 16 | |
| 150–151 | 14 | |
| 152–153 | 10 | |
| 154–155 | 13 | |
| 156–157 | 10 | |
| 158–159 | 7 | |
| 160–161 | 9 | |
| 162–163 | 13 | |
| 164–165 | 4 | |
| 166 | 4 | |
| 167+ | 98 |
Lucille S. Hurley was affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States during their research career.
The scientist received several notable recognitions, including being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation twice, first in 1962 and again in 1969. Additionally, they were awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1966.
Michael S. Clegg;Carl L. Keen;Bo Lönnerdal;Lucille S. Hurley
M. E. Gershwin;R. S. Beach;L. S. Hurley
Lucille S. Hurley;Helene Swenert'on
Carl L. Keen;Bo Lonnerdal;Michael S. Clegg;Lucille S. Hurley
Bo Lönnerdal;Anna G. Stanislowski;Lucille S. Hurley
Bo Lönnerdal;Carl L. Keen;Lucille S. Hurley
Lucille S. Hurley;Jean Gowan;Helene Swenerton
Helene Swenerton;Lucille S. Hurley
G. De Rosa;Carl L Keen;R. M. Leach;L. S. Hurley
Lucille S. Hurley
Helene Swenerton;Ruth Shrader;Lucille S. Hurley
Lawrence Erway;Lawrence Erway;Lucille S. Hurley;Lucille S. Hurley;Andalex S. Fraser;Andalex S. Fraser
Helene Swenerton;Lucille S. Hurley
Richard S. Beach;M. Eric Gershwin;Ronald K. Makishima;Lucille S. Hurley
Sheri Zidenberg-Cherr;Carl L. Keen;Bo Lönnerdal;Lucille S. Hurley
B Lönnerdal;B Hoffman;L S Hurley
C. R. Fleming;R. E. Hodges;Lucille S. Hurley
Lucille S. Hurley;Jean Gowan;Gérard Milhaud
Lucille S. Hurley;Ruth E. Shrader
Lawrence Erway;Lucille S. Hurley;Alex Fraser
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
If you’re passionate about Biology or Biochemistry, there are several online degree options and career paths in the allied health field to consider. For students interested in leadership, exploring the mba healthcare management online is a smart move. This degree combines science and business, preparing graduates for management roles in hospitals, labs, or biotech companies.
Another fast-growing area is medical coding and billing. This field is well-suited for detail-oriented individuals and offers remote work flexibility. When entering this field, you’ll encounter certifications such as ccs vs cpc, which affect your career opportunities and earning potential. Understanding the differences, certification costs, and requirements is crucial.
The medical.coder salary can vary depending on experience, certification, and location, but the field offers competitive pay and job stability. Before pursuing a coding career, consider both the medical coding job outlook and the daily responsibilities to determine if it fits your strengths and career vision.