World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lindsay M. Schoenbohm

Lindsay M. Schoenbohm

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5301
World Ranking
7539
National Ranking
389

Lindsay M. Schoenbohm publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay M. Schoenbohm sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 184 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Lindsay M. Schoenbohm D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsay M. Schoenbohm sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lindsay M. Schoenbohm is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a substantial body of work in geophysics, atmospheric science, and earth-surface processes. They have contributed extensively to topics such as geology and paleoclimatology research, earthquake and tectonic studies, and geological and geochemical analysis.

The scientist has published numerous papers in leading venues, including:

  • Tectonics
  • Geomorphology
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface

Lindsay M. Schoenbohm's most recent papers include:

  • "Cenozoic Exhumation of the Ailaoshan-Red River Shear Zone: New Insights From Low-Temperature Thermochronology" (2020, Tectonics)
  • "A tool for the ages: The Probabilistic Cosmogenic Age Analysis Tool (P-CAAT)" (2022, Quaternary Geochronology)
  • "Tectonic Control on Drainage Evolution in Broken Forelands: Examples From NW Argentina" (2021, Tectonics)
  • "Lithology, topography, and spatial variability of vegetation moderate fluvial erosion in the south-central Andes" (2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters)
  • "Tectonic geomorphology and Plio-Quaternary structural evolution of the Tuzgölü fault zone, Turkey: Implications for deformation in the interior of the Central Anatolian Plateau" (2020, Geosphere)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schoenbohm include:

  • Mitchell McMillan
  • Alexander Tye
  • Jeremy Rimando
  • Peter G. DeCelles
  • Renjie Zhou

Their work spans several subfields encompassing:

  • Geophysics
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Artificial Intelligence

Principal research topics include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

Best Publications

  • Surface uplift, tectonics, and erosion of eastern Tibet from large-scale drainage patterns

    M. K. Clark;M. K. Clark;L. M. Schoenbohm;L. H. Royden;K. X. Whipple

  • Geomorphic constraints on surface uplift, exhumation, and plateau growth in the Red River region, Yunnan Province, China

    Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;K. X. Whipple;B. C. Burchfiel;L. Chen

  • Propagation of surface uplift, lower crustal flow, and Cenozoic tectonics of the southeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau

    Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;B. Clark Burchfiel;Chen Liangzhong

  • Miocene to present activity along the Red River fault, China, in the context of continental extrusion, upper-crustal rotation, and lower-crustal flow

    Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;B. Clark Burchfiel;Chen Liangzhong;Yin Jiyun

  • Late Miocene-Pliocene deceleration of dextral slip between Pamir and Tarim: Implications for Pamir orogenesis

    Edward R. Sobel;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;Jie Chen;Rasmus Thiede

  • Oceanic-style subduction controls late Cenozoic deformation of the Northern Pamir orogen

    Edward R. Sobel;Jie Chen;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;Rasmus Thiede

  • Cenozoic evolution of the Pamir plateau based on stratigraphy, zircon provenance, and stable isotopes of foreland basin sediments at Oytag (Wuyitake) in the Tarim Basin (west China)

    John Bershaw;Carmala N Garzione;Lindsay Schoenbohm;George E Gehrels

  • Does the topographic distribution of the central Andean Puna Plateau result from climatic or geodynamic processes

    M. R. Strecker;R. Alonso;B. Bookhagen;B. Carrapa

  • Mantle-drip magmatism beneath the Altiplano-Puna plateau, central Andes

    M.N. Ducea;A.C. Seclaman;K.E. Murray;D. Jianu

  • Fragmentation of a foreland basin in response to out-of-sequence basement uplifts and structural reactivation; El Cajon-Campo del Arenal Basin, NW Argentina

    Estelle Mortimer;Barbara Carrapa;Isabelle Coutand;Lindsay Schoenbohm

  • Mafic volcanism on the Puna Plateau, NW Argentina: Implications for lithospheric composition and evolution with an emphasis on lithospheric foundering

    Scott T. Drew;Mihai N. Ducea;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm

  • Early Cenozoic uplift of the Puna Plateau, Central Andes, based on stable isotope paleoaltimetry of hydrated volcanic glass

    Robin R. Canavan;Barbara Carrapa;Mark T. Clementz;Jay Quade

  • Cyclical orogenic processes in the Cenozoic central Andes

    P.G. DeCelles;G. Zandt;S.L. Beck;C.A. Currie

  • Quaternary glaciation of the Tashkurgan Valley, Southeast Pamir

    Lewis A. Owen;Jie Chen;Kathyrn A. Hedrick;Marc W. Caffee

  • Geomorphology of anomalously high glaciated mountains at the northwestern end of Tibet: Muztag Ata and Kongur Shan

    Yeong Bae Seong;Lewis A. Owen;Chaolu Yi;Robert C. Finkel

  • Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Ailao Shan-Red River fault (SE Tibet): implications for kinematic change during plateau growth

    Yang Wang;Yang Wang;Bo Zhang;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;Jinjiang Zhang

  • Late Cenozoic extension and crustal doming in the India‐Eurasia collision zone: New thermochronologic constraints from the NE Chinese Pamir

    Rasmus C. Thiede;Edward R. Sobel;Jie Chen;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm

  • Dynamics of deformation and sedimentation in the northern Sierras Pampeanas : an integrated study of the Neogene Fiambalá basin, NW Argentina ; reply

    Barbara Carrapa;Joern Hauer;Lindsay Schoenbohm;Manfred R. Strecker

  • Normal faulting along the southern margin of the Puna Plateau, northwest Argentina

    Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;Lindsay M. Schoenbohm;Manfred R. Strecker

  • Tectonics, Climate, and Landscape Evolution of the Southern Central Andes: the Argentine Puna Plateau and Adjacent Regions between 22 and 30°S

    Ricardo N. Alonso;Bodo Bookhagen;Barbara Carrapa;Isabelle Coutand

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward R. Sobel
Edward R. Sobel University of Potsdam
Barbara Carrapa
Barbara Carrapa University of Arizona
Lewis A. Owen
Lewis A. Owen North Carolina State University
Daniel F. Stockli
Daniel F. Stockli The University of Texas at Austin
Manfred R. Strecker
Manfred R. Strecker University of Potsdam
Marc W. Caffee
Marc W. Caffee Purdue University West Lafayette
Peter G. DeCelles
Peter G. DeCelles University of Arizona
Peizhen Zhang
Peizhen Zhang Sun Yat-sen University
Mihai N. Ducea
Mihai N. Ducea University of Arizona
Jay Quade
Jay Quade University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science can open doors to various career paths, but it's also important to consider complementary fields and flexible learning options. For example, many older adults are increasingly exploring new educational opportunities, and resources highlighting the degrees for older adults provide valuable insights for lifelong learners interested in expanding their skills.

Additionally, for those interested in research, information management, or academic roles linked to Earth Science data, a online mlis programs accredited ala offer specialized training in library and information sciences. This complements scientific expertise with effective data organization and retrieval skills.

Related degrees, such as a degree in library science, support careers in knowledge management, archives, and digital resource curation within scientific institutions.

For those interested in visualizing Earth Science phenomena, a creative angle can be pursued through a bachelors in photography online, where students develop skills in digital imaging that are essential for scientific documentation and public communication.

Best Scientists Citing Lindsay M. Schoenbohm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles