World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
33
Citations
3210
World Ranking
8512
National Ranking
549

Lihua Fang publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lihua Fang sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 556 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 151 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Lihua Fang D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lihua Fang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 181 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sedimentary and crustal thicknesses and Poisson's ratios for the NE Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent regions based on dense seismic arrays

    Unknown

  • Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of M S 7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake

    Unknown

  • Aftershock sequence relocation of the 2021 MS7.4 Maduo Earthquake, Qinghai, China

    Unknown

  • The 2017 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake: A Complicated Event Occurred in a Young Fault System

    Jianbao Sun;Han Yue;Zhengkang Shen;Zhengkang Shen;Lihua Fang

  • Deep learning for seismic phase detection and picking in the aftershock zone of 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake

    Lijun Zhu;Zhigang Peng;James H. McClellan;Chenyu Li

  • Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand

    Wenbin Xu;Guangcai Feng;Lingsen Meng;Ailin Zhang

  • Crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio in southwest China based on data from dense seismic arrays

    Unknown

  • High resolution Rayleigh wave group velocity tomography in North China from ambient seismic noise

    Lihua Fang;Lihua Fang;Jianping Wu;Zhifeng Ding;G. F. Panza;G. F. Panza;G. F. Panza

  • Aftershock Observation and Analysis of the 2013 Ms 7.0 Lushan Earthquake

    Unknown

  • The high-resolution community velocity model V2.0 of southwest China, constructed by joint body and surface wave tomography of data recorded at temporary dense arrays

    Unknown

  • An Earthquake Detection and Location Architecture for Continuous Seismograms: Phase Picking, Association, Location, and Matched Filter (PALM)

    Unknown

  • Crustal anisotropy and deformation of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau revealed by Pms splitting

    Unknown

  • DiTing: A large-scale Chinese seismic benchmark dataset for artificial intelligence in seismology

    Unknown

  • Joint analysis of the 2014 Kangding, southwest China, earthquake sequence with seismicity relocation and InSAR inversion

    Guoyan Jiang;Yangmao Wen;Yajing Liu;Xiwei Xu

  • Geophysical constraints on the link between cratonization and orogeny: Evidence from the Tibetan Plateau and the North China Craton

    Zhongjie Zhang;Jiwen Teng;Fabio Romanelli;Carla Braitenberg

  • Relocation of mainshock and aftershock sequence of the M s 7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou earthquake

    Unknown

  • The 2015 Mw 6.4 Pishan Earthquake: Seismic Hazards of an Active Blind Wedge Thrust System at the Western Kunlun Range Front, Northwest Tibetan Plateau

    Tao Li;Jie Chen;Lihua Fang;Zhuxin Chen

  • Shallow Faults Reactivated by Hydraulic Fracturing: The 2019 Weiyuan Earthquake Sequences in Sichuan, China

    Maomao Wang;Hongfeng Yang;Lihua Fang;Libo Han

  • A Comprehensive Analysis on the Stress Field and Seismic Anisotropy in Eastern Tibet

    Unknown

  • Slip Model for the 25 November 2016 Mw 6.6 Aketao Earthquake, Western China, Revealed by Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 Observations

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse educational and career options beyond traditional geology roles. Many students consider complementary degrees to enhance their expertise and job prospects. For instance, pursuing a library science masters can be valuable for those interested in managing scientific data and research archives related to Earth studies.

Visual documentation plays a crucial role in Earth Science research and education. An online photography degrees program can equip students with skills to capture and analyze environmental changes, facilitating effective communication of scientific findings.

Veterans seeking to transition into Earth Science fields may find specialized opportunities by combining their experience with an online photography degrees for veterans. This path supports their career goals with tailored online learning options that acknowledge military backgrounds.

Additionally, language skills are increasingly important for global collaboration in Earth Science. Enrolling in one of the cheapest online spanish degree programs can aid professionals working in Spanish-speaking regions, broadening their research and fieldwork capabilities.

Recently Published Articles