World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4786
World Ranking
8623
National Ranking
3664

Kenneth J. Muller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Muller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kenneth J. Muller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Muller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth J. Muller is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the biological sciences, with a primary focus on neuroscience alongside contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their work is notably concentrated in several subfields including molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and developmental neuroscience. The main topics of their research involve retinal development and disorders, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and mechanisms related to neurogenesis and neuroplasticity.

Kenneth J. Muller has contributed to academic literature through research papers and book publications. Among recent papers, one key publication is titled "Physiologic maturation is both extrinsically and intrinsically regulated in progenitor-derived neurons", published in 2020 in Scientific Reports. This paper reflects a focus on neuronal maturation processes and has been cited in related neuroscience contexts.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Praseeda Venugopalan, Evan G. Cameron, Xiong Zhang, Michael Nahmou, and Jeffrey L. Goldberg. These coauthors have participated in various projects and publications alongside Kenneth J. Muller.

The primary publication venue for Kenneth J. Muller's work is Scientific Reports, which features prominently among their contributions.

In the realm of book publications, Kenneth J. Muller has authored work published by Springer Nature, notably the forthcoming book "Die Thermodynamik des Gin Tonic", scheduled for publication in 2025.

  • Physiologic maturation is both extrinsically and intrinsically regulated in progenitor-derived neurons (2020, Scientific Reports)

  • Praseeda Venugopalan
  • Evan G. Cameron
  • Xiong Zhang
  • Michael Nahmou
  • Jeffrey L. Goldberg

  • Scientific Reports

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Neurobiology of the Leech

    Kenneth J. Muller;John G. Nicholls;Gunther Siegmund Stent

  • The shapes of sensory and motor neurones and the distribution of their synapses in ganglia of the leech: a study using intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase.

    Kenneth J. Muller;U. J. McMahan

  • Nonequivalence of alpha-bungarotoxin receptors and acetylcholine receptors in chick sympathetic neurons

    S T Carbonetto;D M Fambrough;K J Muller

  • The morphological and physiological properties of a regenerating synapse in the C.N.S. of the leech.

    Kenneth J. Muller;Salvatore Carbonetto

  • Transplanted neurons integrate into adult retinas and respond to light

    Praseeda Venugopalan;Praseeda Venugopalan;Yan Wang;Tu Nguyen;Abigail Huang

  • Transmission at a ‘direct’ electrical connexion mediated by an interneurone in the leech.

    K J Muller;S A Scott

  • Individual microglia move rapidly and directly to nerve lesions in the leech central nervous system

    Ellen Mcglade-Mcculloh;Alice M. Morrissey;Fernando Norona;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Microglial movement to sites of nerve lesion in the leech CNS.

    Vincent J. Morgese;Ellen J. Elliott;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Synapses between neurones in the central nervous system of the leech.

    Kenneth J. Muller

  • Innexins form two types of channels

    Li Bao;Li Bao;Stuart Samuels;Silviu Locovei;Eduardo R. Macagno

  • Nitric Oxide Influences Injury-Induced Microglial Migration and Accumulation in the Leech CNS

    Aileen Chen;Shanta M. Kumar;Christie L. Sahley;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Non-Associative Learning and Serotonin Induce Similar Bi-Directional Changes in Excitability of a Neuron Critical for Learning in the Medicinal Leech

    Brian D. Burrell;Christie L. Sahley;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Innexin and pannexin channels and their signaling

    Gerhard Dahl;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Tissue engineering the retinal ganglion cell nerve fiber layer

    Karl E. Kador;Ramon B. Montero;Praseeda Venugopalan;Jonathan Hertz

  • The S cell: an interneuron essential for sensitization and full dishabituation of leech shortening

    Christie L. Sahley;Barbara K. Modney;Nicholas M. Boulis;Kenneth J. Muller

  • ATP and NO Dually Control Migration of Microglia to Nerve Lesions

    Yuanli Duan;Christie L. Sahley;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Neuroglial ATP release through innexin channels controls microglial cell movement to a nerve injury

    Stuart E. Samuels;Jeffrey B. Lipitz;Gerhard Dahl;Kenneth J. Muller

  • A regenerating neurone in the leech can form an electrical synapse on its severed axon segment.

    Salvatore Carbonetto;Kenneth J. Muller

  • REPAIR OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM : LESSONS FROM LESIONS IN LEECHES

    Rommy von Bernhardi;Kenneth J. Muller

  • Nerve Injury Induces a Rapid Efflux of Nitric Oxide (NO) Detected with a Novel NO Microsensor

    Shanta M. Kumar;D. Marshall Porterfield;Kenneth J. Muller;Peter J. S. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey L. Goldberg
Jeffrey L. Goldberg Stanford University
Gerhard Dahl
Gerhard Dahl University of Miami
Peter K. Smith
Peter K. Smith Goldsmiths University of London
Albert J. Aguayo
Albert J. Aguayo McGill University
William B. Kristan
William B. Kristan University of California, San Diego
Gunther S. Stent
Gunther S. Stent University of California, Berkeley
Douglas M. Fambrough
Douglas M. Fambrough Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career opportunities in neuroscience often starts with selecting the right educational pathway. Many students look for flexible options, such as easiest online bachelor's degree programs, to build a solid academic foundation while balancing other life commitments.

For those wanting to specialize or boost their credentials, online certifications can be an efficient way to gain high-demand skills and increase earning potential. These certifications cover a range of in-demand fields relevant to neuroscience, such as healthcare, research analysis, and mental health services.

Some learners may be interested in advancing their studies with graduate programs. There are several affordable MSW programs online for those inclined towards social work and patient advocacy, or online BCBA programs for those focused on behavioral analysis and applied neuroscience.

By exploring these flexible online options, you can chart a personalized pathway in neuroscience and related fields, all while keeping education affordable and accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth J. Muller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles