World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
8366
World Ranking
18051
National Ranking
41

Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 117 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis is affiliated with the University of Crete in Greece and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, agricultural, and biological sciences. Their work spans several interconnected areas such as molecular biology, plant science, and food science. The scientist's research mainly addresses topics related to polyamine metabolism and applications, plant tissue culture and regeneration, plant stress responses and tolerance, plant gene expression analysis, horticultural and viticultural research, fermentation and sensory analysis, and plant physiology and cultivation studies.

Their recent publications include:

  • Antisense-mediated S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase silencing affects heat stress responses of tobacco plants, 2020, Functional Plant Biology
  • GUS Reporter-Aided Promoter Deletion Analysis of A. thaliana POLYAMINE OXIDASE 3, 2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Revitalization of the Greek Vitis database: a multimedia web-backed genetic database for germplasm management of Vitis resources in Greece, 2021, Journal of Wine Research

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis include:

  • Ιfigeneia Mellidou
  • Katerina Karamanoli
  • Helen-Isis A. Constantinidou
  • Varvara Podia
  • Dimitris C. Chatzopoulos

Common publication venues where their research has appeared are:

  • Functional Plant Biology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Journal of Wine Research

Their main fields of study comprise:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Subfields within these disciplines include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Plant Science
  • Food Science

Research topics commonly addressed are:

  • Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
  • Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Plant Gene Expression Analysis
  • Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

Best Publications

  • Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms.

    R. Arroyo-García;L. Ruiz-García;L. Bolling;R. Ocete

  • Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenases to form glutamate for proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine.

    Damianos S. Skopelitis;Nikolaos V. Paranychianakis;Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Eleni D. Pliakonis

  • Microsatellite variability in grapevine cultivars from different European regions and evaluation of assignment testing to assess the geographic origin of cultivars

    K. M. Sefc;M. S. Lopes;F. Lefort;R. Botta

  • Spermidine Exodus and Oxidation in the Apoplast Induced by Abiotic Stress Is Responsible for H2O2 Signatures That Direct Tolerance Responses in Tobacco

    Panagiotis N. Moschou;Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Ioannis D. Delis;Athina H. Andriopoulou

  • The polyamines and their catabolic products are significant players in the turnover of nitrogenous molecules in plants

    P.N. Moschou;J. Wu;A. Cona;P. Tavladoraki

  • Bridging the Gap between Plant and Mammalian Polyamine Catabolism: A Novel Peroxisomal Polyamine Oxidase Responsible for a Full Back-Conversion Pathway in Arabidopsis

    Panagiotis N. Moschou;Maite Sanmartin;Athina H. Andriopoulou;Enrique Rojo

  • Plant polyamine catabolism: The state of the art

    Panagiotis N. Moschou;Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Polyamine Levels and Polyamine Anabolism in Different Organs/Tissues of the Tobacco Plant. Correlations with Age, Cell Division/Expansion, and Differentiation

    Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Spermidine oxidase-derived H2O2 regulates pollen plasma membrane hyperpolarization-activated Ca2+-permeable channels and pollen tube growth

    Juyou Wu;Zhonglin Shang;Jun Wu;Xueting Jiang

  • Functional diversity inside the Arabidopsis polyamine oxidase gene family

    Paola Fincato;Panagiotis N. Moschou;Valentina Spedaletti;Raffaela Tavazza

  • Sites and Regulation of Polyamine Catabolism in the Tobacco Plant. Correlations with Cell Division/Expansion, Cell Cycle Progression, and Vascular Development

    Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Polyamines in the photosynthetic apparatus : Photosystem II highly resolved subcomplexes are enriched in spermine.

    Kiriakos Kotzabasis;Constantina Fotinou;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis;Demetrios Ghanotakis

  • Polyamines inhibit NADPH oxidase-mediated superoxide generation and putrescine prevents programmed cell death induced by polyamine oxidase-generated hydrogen peroxide

    Anastasia K. Papadakis;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Abscisic acid signals reorientation of polyamine metabolism to orchestrate stress responses via the polyamine exodus pathway in grapevine.

    Imene Toumi;Panagiotis N. Moschou;Konstantinos A. Paschalidis;Badra Bouamama

  • Polyamines and programmed cell death

    Panagiotis N. Moschou;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing polyamine oxidase are not able to cope with oxidative burst generated by abiotic factors.

    Panagiotis N Moschou;Ioannis D Delis;Konstantinos A Paschalidis;Kalliopi A Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Modulation of higher-plant NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tobacco via alteration of beta subunit levels.

    Matthew P. Purnell;Damianos S. Skopelitis;Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis;José R. Botella

  • PERTURBATION OF POLYAMINE CATABOLISM CAN STRONGLY AFFECT ROOT DEVELOPMENT AND XYLEM DIFFERENTIATION

    Alessandra Tisi;Rodolfo Federico;Sandra Moreno;Sergio Lucretti

  • The Complexity of Enzymic Control of Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration May Affect the Regeneration Potential of Plant Protoplasts.

    A. de Marco;K. A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

  • Engineered Polyamine Catabolism Preinduces Tolerance of Tobacco to Bacteria and Oomycetes

    Panagiotis N. Moschou;Panagiotis F. Sarris;Nicholas Skandalis;Athina H. Andriopoulou

Frequent Co-Authors

François Lefort
François Lefort University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Angelos K. Kanellis
Angelos K. Kanellis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Bertrand Hirel
Bertrand Hirel INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Javier Ibáñez
Javier Ibáñez University of La Rioja
Aziz Aziz
Aziz Aziz University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne
Hernâni Gerós
Hernâni Gerós University of Minho
José Ramón Botella
José Ramón Botella University of Queensland
Euripides G. Stephanou
Euripides G. Stephanou University of Crete
Juyou Wu
Juyou Wu Nanjing Agricultural University
Keith J. Edwards
Keith J. Edwards University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree programs and evolving career tracks. Many students combine their science backgrounds with advanced studies like an mba healthcare management online, which prepares graduates for leadership in hospitals, research firms, and biotech organizations.

For those interested in clinical data, studying to become a certified professional coder is a promising pathway. Certified coding specialists play critical roles in health information management, ensuring accuracy in medical records and supporting patient care.

If you’re considering entering this field, it's helpful to learn about medical.coding salary trends, certification requirements, and advancement opportunities. The healthcare industry offers competitive pay for coders, especially for those with specialized credentials and up-to-date training.

Weighing your options? Discover the advantages and challenges of this profession in our resource, “is medical coding a good job.” Whether you want to lead, analyze data, or support clinical services, biosciences can be a springboard into many in-demand online degrees and rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Kalliopi A. Roubelakis-Angelakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles