| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering | 36 | 2582 | 2419 | 90 | 87 | 175 | 4017 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Junkao Liu between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Junkao Liu published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 20 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.
176 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 4 |
| 2008 | 8 |
| 2009 | 9 |
| 2010 | 10 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 12 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 9 |
| 2015 | 15 |
| 2016 | 15 |
| 2017 | 8 |
| 2018 | 16 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2020 | 4 |
| 2021 | 11 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 10 |
| 2024 | 12 |
| 2025 | 8 |
| Total | 176 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Junkao Liu sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 175 publications — 35th percentile
35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 10 | |
| 57–66 | 23 | |
| 67–76 | 32 | |
| 77–86 | 62 | |
| 87–96 | 67 | |
| 97–106 | 91 | |
| 107–116 | 113 | |
| 117–126 | 115 | |
| 127–136 | 130 | |
| 137–146 | 140 | |
| 147–156 | 155 | |
| 157–166 | 132 | |
| 167–176 | 133 | 175 |
| 177–186 | 130 | |
| 187–196 | 140 | |
| 197–206 | 115 | |
| 207–216 | 125 | |
| 217–226 | 117 | |
| 227–236 | 99 | |
| 237–246 | 92 | |
| 247–256 | 100 | |
| 257–266 | 95 | |
| 267–276 | 88 | |
| 277–286 | 77 | |
| 287–296 | 74 | |
| 297–306 | 74 | |
| 307–316 | 62 | |
| 317–326 | 70 | |
| 327–336 | 59 | |
| 337–346 | 58 | |
| 347–356 | 45 | |
| 357–366 | 44 | |
| 367–376 | 36 | |
| 377–386 | 41 | |
| 387–396 | 32 | |
| 397–406 | 23 | |
| 407–416 | 28 | |
| 417–426 | 27 | |
| 427–436 | 25 | |
| 437–446 | 23 | |
| 447–456 | 23 | |
| 457–466 | 20 | |
| 467–476 | 12 | |
| 477–486 | 24 | |
| 487–496 | 18 | |
| 497–506 | 12 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 21 | |
| 527–536 | 12 | |
| 537–546 | 8 | |
| 547–556 | 16 | |
| 557–566 | 3 | |
| 567–576 | 11 | |
| 577–586 | 6 | |
| 587–596 | 5 | |
| 597–606 | 6 | |
| 607–616 | 7 | |
| 617–626 | 7 | |
| 627–636 | 10 | |
| 637–646 | 4 | |
| 647–656 | 3 | |
| 657–658 | 2 | |
| 659+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Junkao Liu sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile
28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 83 | |
| 31 | 113 | |
| 32 | 144 | |
| 33 | 153 | |
| 34 | 189 | |
| 35 | 158 | |
| 36 | 139 | 36 |
| 37 | 127 | |
| 38 | 130 | |
| 39 | 126 | |
| 40 | 104 | |
| 41 | 100 | |
| 42 | 107 | |
| 43 | 101 | |
| 44 | 103 | |
| 45 | 79 | |
| 46 | 88 | |
| 47 | 70 | |
| 48 | 83 | |
| 49 | 44 | |
| 50 | 64 | |
| 51 | 56 | |
| 52 | 50 | |
| 53 | 48 | |
| 54 | 58 | |
| 55 | 52 | |
| 56 | 48 | |
| 57 | 42 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 37 | |
| 61 | 42 | |
| 62 | 44 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 33 | |
| 65 | 29 | |
| 66 | 23 | |
| 67 | 29 | |
| 68 | 24 | |
| 69 | 19 | |
| 70 | 34 | |
| 71 | 26 | |
| 72 | 19 | |
| 73 | 18 | |
| 74 | 19 | |
| 75 | 14 | |
| 76 | 19 | |
| 77 | 8 | |
| 78 | 18 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 17 | |
| 82 | 11 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 7 | |
| 85 | 9 | |
| 86 | 8 | |
| 87 | 6 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 10 | |
| 91 | 4 | |
| 92 | 4 | |
| 93+ | 100 |
Liang Wang;Weishan Chen;Junkao Liu;Jie Deng
Junkao Liu;Yingxiang Liu;Liangliang Zhao;Dongmei Xu
Yingxiang Liu;Weishan Chen;Junkao Liu;Xiaohui Yang
Dongmei Xu;Yingxiang Liu;Shengjun Shi;Junkao Liu
Hengyu Li;Junkao Liu;Kai Li;Yingxiang Liu
Yingxiang Liu;Weishan Chen;Xiaohui Yang;Junkao Liu
Hengyu Li;Junkao Liu;Kai Li;Yingxiang Liu
Jie Deng;Yingxiang Liu;Junkao Liu;Dongmei Xu
Yingxiang Liu;Weishan Chen;Junkao Liu;Shengjun Shi
Qiang Zhang;Weishan Chen;Yingxiang Liu;Junkao Liu
Yingxiang Liu;Weishan Chen;Junkao Liu;Shengjun Shi
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Shijing Zhang;Junkao Liu;Jie Deng;Yingxiang Liu
Yingxiang Liu;Junkao Liu;Weishan Chen;Shengjun Shi
Unknown
Qingbing Chang;Weishan Chen;Junkao Liu;Hongpeng Yu
Xuefeng Ma;Yingxiang Liu;Jie Deng;Shijing Zhang
Weishan Chen;Yingxiang Liu;Xiaohui Yang;Junkao Liu
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career paths. For those interested in diverse options, understanding related degrees can provide valuable insights. For example, veterans seeking flexible study options might consider online speech pathology degree programs for veterans, offering a practical blend of healthcare and communication skills that complement engineering teamwork and leadership roles.
Accelerated education is another important consideration, especially for students eager to enter the workforce quickly. Programs such as 5-year speech pathology programs highlight how integrated curricula can shorten study time without compromising quality, a concept that appeals to engineering students aiming for swift career advancement.
Beyond traditional engineering roles, some graduates leverage analytical and problem-solving skills in unique ways, such as becoming a criminal profiler. This career combines behavioral science with technical expertise, illustrating the broad applicability of an engineering mindset.
Finally, for those interested in the human element of technology development, pursuing degrees in counseling can complement technical skills with psychological knowledge, essential for designing user-centered systems and improving workplace dynamics.
