World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
17832
World Ranking
3355
National Ranking
305

Josephine Barnes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josephine Barnes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 194 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Josephine Barnes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josephine Barnes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Josephine Barnes is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, as well as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, notably Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments, Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Health, Environment, and Cognitive Aging, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, and Nutritional Studies and Diet.

Josephine Barnes has contributed to multiple research publications in various academic journals. Frequent publication venues include Brain Communications, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Neurobiology of Aging, Neurology, and the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Recent papers by Josephine Barnes include:

  • "Strategic white matter hyperintensity locations for cognitive impairment: A multicenter lesion-symptom mapping study in 3525 memory clinic patients," 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Safety and efficacy of losartan for the reduction of brain atrophy in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (the RADAR trial): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial," 2021, The Lancet Neurology
  • "CSF amyloid is a consistent predictor of white matter hyperintensities across the disease course from aging to Alzheimer's disease," 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Life course, genetic, and neuropathological associations with brain age in the 1946 British Birth Cohort: a population-based study," 2022, The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • "Circulating Metabolome and White Matter Hyperintensities in Women and Men," 2022, Circulation

Josephine Barnes frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Carole H. Sudre, Jonathan M. Schott, Ian B. Malone, David M. Cash, and Marcus Richards. The frequency of collaboration varies, with the highest number of joint publications with Carole H. Sudre.

Best Publications

  • Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance?

    Josephine Barnes;Gerard R. Ridgway;Gerard R. Ridgway;Jonathan W. Bartlett;Susie M. D. Henley

  • Accurate automatic estimation of total intracranial volume: a nuisance variable with less nuisance.

    Ian B. Malone;Kelvin K. Leung;Shona Clegg;Josephine Barnes

  • Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease Added value over whole brain volume measures

    W.J.P. Henneman;J.D. Sluimer;J. Barnes;W.M. van der Flier

  • A meta-analysis of hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer's disease.

    Josephine Barnes;Jonathan W. Bartlett;Laura A. van de Pol;Clement T. Loy

  • The clinical profile of right temporal lobe atrophy

    Dennis Chan;Valerie Anderson;Yolande Pijnenburg;Jennifer Whitwell

  • Tracking atrophy progression in familial Alzheimer's disease: a serial MRI study

    Basil H Ridha;Basil H Ridha;Josephine Barnes;Jonathan W Bartlett;Alison Godbolt

  • Accuracy of dementia diagnosis - a direct comparison between radiologists and a computerized method

    S. Kloppel;C.M. Stonnington;J. Barnes;F Chen

  • An event-based model for disease progression and its application in familial Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease

    Hubert M. J. Fonteijn;Hubert M. J. Fonteijn;Marc Modat;Matthew J. Clarkson;Matthew J. Clarkson;Josephine Barnes

  • STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application to hippocampal segmentation and brain parcelation

    M. Jorge Cardoso;Kelvin Leung;Marc Modat;Shiva Keihaninejad

  • Automated cross-sectional and longitudinal hippocampal volume measurement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

    Kelvin K. Leung;Josephine Barnes;Gerard R. Ridgway;Jonathan W. Bartlett

  • Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort (Insight 46): an epidemiological study.

    Christopher A Lane;Josephine Barnes;Jennifer M Nicholas;Carole H Sudre

  • Cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry in posterior cortical atrophy and typical Alzheimer's disease.

    Manja Lehmann;Sebastian J. Crutch;Gerard R. Ridgway;Basil H. Ridha

  • Magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2

    Clifford R. Jack;Josephine Barnes;Matt A. Bernstein;Bret J. Borowski

  • Amyloid load and cerebral atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: An 11C-PIB positron emission tomography study

    Hilary A. Archer;Paul Edison;David J. Brooks;Jo Barnes

  • Differential Regional Atrophy of the Cingulate Gyrus in Alzheimer Disease: A Volumetric MRI Study

    Bethany F. Jones;Josephine Barnes;Harry B.M. Uylings;Nick C. Fox

  • Brain MAPS: An automated, accurate and robust brain extraction technique using a template library

    Kelvin K. Leung;Josephine Barnes;Marc Modat;Gerard R. Ridgway

  • The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Clifford R. Jack;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer

  • Cerebral atrophy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: rates and acceleration.

    Kelvin K. Leung;Jonathan W. Bartlett;Josephine Barnes;Emily N. Manning

  • Measurements of the amygdala and hippocampus in pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

    Josephine Barnes;Jennifer L. Whitwell;Chris Frost;Chris Frost;Keith A. Josephs

  • 3D characterization of brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using tensor-based morphometry.

    Xue Hua;Alex D. Leow;Suh Lee;Andrea D. Klunder

  • Research Article The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: Evidence of validity

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Martina Bocchetta;Corinna Bauer;Kristian S. Frederiksen

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick C. Fox
Nick C. Fox University College London
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Martin N. Rossor
Martin N. Rossor University College London
Jonathan M. Schott
Jonathan M. Schott University College London
Marc Modat
Marc Modat King's College London
Rachael I. Scahill
Rachael I. Scahill University College London
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Sebastian J. Crutch
Sebastian J. Crutch University College London
Matthew J. Clarkson
Matthew J. Clarkson University College London
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering a career in neuroscience, several related online degrees offer valuable pathways into the fields of mental health, psychology, and social work. An accredited online psychology degree provides a broad foundation in human behavior and cognitive processes, serving as a strong complement or alternative to neuroscience study.

Specialized programs, such as an online masters in psychology, deepen your expertise and open doors to advanced research roles or counseling positions. If you are interested in therapeutic roles, a masters in marriage and family therapy online can prepare you for licensure and practice with individuals and families.

Additionally, those looking for flexibility and accessibility may consider one of the easiest msw programs to get into, which can lead to impactful roles in social work and community services. Each of these online degrees can provide a different perspective and skillset, allowing you to tailor your career in alignment with your interests in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Josephine Barnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles