World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonas Peters

Jonas Peters

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
36
Citations
9851
World Ranking
2578
National Ranking
44

Jonas Peters publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Peters sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 95 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jonas Peters D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonas Peters sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms

    Jonas Peters;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences

    Jakob Runge;Jakob Runge;Sebastian Bathiany;Erik Bollt;Gustau Camps-Valls

  • Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models

    Patrik O. Hoyer;Dominik Janzing;Joris M. Mooij;Jonas Peters

  • Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals

    Jonas Peters;Peter Bühlmann;Nicolai Meinshausen

  • Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery

    Kun Zhang;Jonas Peters;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Causal discovery with continuous additive noise models

    Jonas Peters;Joris M. Mooij;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: methods and benchmarks

    Joris M. Mooij;Jonas Peters;Dominik Janzing;Jakob Zscheischler

  • On causal and anticausal learning

    Dominik Janzing;Jonas Peters;Eleni Sgouritsa;Kun Zhang

  • The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure

    Rajen D. Shah;Jonas Peters

  • Identifiability of Gaussian structural equation models with equal error variances

    Jonas Peters;Peter Buhlmann

  • On Causal and Anticausal Learning

    Bernhard Schoelkopf;Dominik Janzing;Jonas Peters;Eleni Sgouritsa

  • Invariant Causal Prediction for Nonlinear Models

    Christina Heinze-Deml;Jonas Peters;Nicolai Meinshausen

  • Invariant models for causal transfer learning

    Mateo Rojas-Carulla;Bernhard Schölkopf;Richard Turner;Jonas Peters

  • Kernel-based Tests for Joint Independence

    Niklas Pfister;Peter Bühlmann;Bernhard Schölkopf;Jonas Peters;Jonas Peters

  • Causal Inference on Discrete Data Using Additive Noise Models

    J. Peters;D. Janzing;B. Scholkopf

  • Methods for causal inference from gene perturbation experiments and validation.

    Nicolai Meinshausen;Alain Hauser;Joris M. Mooij;Jonas Peters

  • Regression by dependence minimization and its application to causal inference in additive noise models

    Joris Mooij;Dominik Janzing;Jonas Peters;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Anchor regression: heterogeneous data meets causality

    Dominik Rothenhäusler;Nicolai Meinshausen;Peter Bühlmann;Jonas Peters

  • CAM: Causal additive models, high-dimensional order search and penalized regression

    Peter Bühlmann;Jonas Peters;Jan Ernest

  • Causal Discovery with Continuous Additive Noise Models

    Jonas Peters;Joris Mooij;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schölkopf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related degrees online can open diverse career opportunities. Many choose to complement their mathematical expertise with advanced business skills, such as enrolling in programs like the fastest mba online to accelerate career growth in management and strategy.

Finance is another popular field for math graduates, leveraging quantitative skills for financial analysis and risk management. Those interested may consider obtaining the cheapest masters in finance, balancing cost with valuable professional outcomes.

Entrepreneurial and marketing roles also benefit from a strong math foundation. Combining this with a specialized degree like a masters in marketing can enhance analytical skills while improving market strategy expertise.

For those inclined towards research and leadership in academia or industry, a cheapest online dba program offers a cost-effective way to gain doctoral-level business administration knowledge, complementing mathematical problem-solving abilities.

Recently Published Articles