World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
11680
World Ranking
3326
National Ranking
1539

John R. Sladek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Sladek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 196 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John R. Sladek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Sladek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Sladek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields, including Engineering and Neuroscience, with particular subfields in Control and Systems Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Biomaterials.

Their research covers several topics, notably:

  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Nuclear Issues and Defense
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

Recent publications illustrate the interdisciplinary nature of their research. These include:

  • "Development of a New IEC Technical Report on Cybersecurity Risk Management for I&C and ES in Nuclear Power Plants," 2021, published in the 12th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT 2021)
  • "Comparison of Fetal Mesencephalic Grafts, AAV-delivered GDNF, and Both Combined in an MPTP-induced Nonhuman Primate Parkinson's Model," 2020, published by UNC Libraries
  • "Human Neural Stem Cells Survive Long Term in the Midbrain of Dopamine-Depleted Monkeys After GDNF Overexpression and Project Neurites Toward an Appropriate Target," 2020, published by UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Sladek on various projects include D. Eugene Redmond, Csaba Léránth, Michael Rowland, Edward Quinn, and Caleb R.S. McEntire.

Their work has been disseminated primarily through venues such as UNC Libraries and the 12th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies conference. These platforms reflect a blend of engineering and biomedical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Behavioral improvement in a primate Parkinson's model is associated with multiple homeostatic effects of human neural stem cells

    D. Eugene Redmond;Kimberly B. Bjugstad;Yang D. Teng;Vaclav Ourednik

  • Monoamine distribution in primate brain. V. Monoaminergic nuclei: anatomy, pathways, and local organization.

    David L. Felten;John R. Sladek

  • FETAL NEURONAL GRAFTS IN MONKEYS GIVEN METHYLPHENYLTETRAHYDROPYRIDINE

    D.Eugene Redmond;RobertH. Roth;JohnD. Elsworth;JohnR. Sladek

  • The aged monkey basal forebrain: rescue and sprouting of axotomized basal forebrain neurons after grafts of encapsulated cells secreting human nerve growth factor.

    Jeffrey H. Kordower;Shelley R. Winn;Yue-Ting Liu;Elliott J. Mufson

  • In vivo expression of therapeutic human genes for dopamine production in the caudates of MPTP-treated monkeys using an AAV vector

    MJ During;RJ Samulski;JD Elsworth;MG Kaplitt

  • Spontaneous blink rates correlate with dopamine levels in the caudate nucleus of MPTP-treated monkeys.

    J.R. Taylor;J.D. Elsworth;M.S. Lawrence;J.R. Sladek

  • Aged mice are more sensitive to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine treatment than young adults.

    M. Gupta;B.K. Gupta;R. Thomas;V. Bruemmer

  • Functional development of grafted vasopressin neurons

    Don Gash;John R. Sladek;Celia D. Sladek

  • Simultaneous monoamine histofluorescence and neuropeptide immunocytochemistry: II. Correlative distribution of catecholamine varicosities and magnocellular neurosecretory neurons in the rat supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei.

    Thomas H. Mc Neill;John R. Sladek

  • Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts into dopaminergic neuron-like cells.

    Xinjian Liu;Xinjian Liu;Fang Li;Elizabeth A. Stubblefield;Barbara Blanchard

  • Postmortem analysis of adrenal-medulla-to-caudate autograft in a patient with Parkinson's disease.

    Howard Hurtig;Howard Hurtig;Jeffrey Joyce;John R. Sladek;John Q. Trojanowski

  • Cognitive and motor deficits in the acquisition of an object retrieval/detour task in MPTP-treated monkeys.

    J. R. Taylor;J. D. Elsworth;R. H. Roth;J. R. Sladek

  • Monoamine distribution in primate brain. I Catecholamine-containing perikarya in the brain stem of Macaca speciosa.

    David L. Garver;John R. Sladek

  • Aging-related changes in the nigrostriatal dopamine system and the response to MPTP in nonhuman primates: Diminished compensatory mechanisms as a prelude to parkinsonism

    Timothy J. Collier;Jack Lipton;Brian F. Daley;Stephane Palfi

  • Dopamine Cell Replacement: Parkinson's Disease

    D M Yurek;J R Sladek

  • Symptomatic and asymptomatic 1 -methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridinetreated primates: Biochemical changes in striatal regions

    J.D. Elsworth;A.Y. Deutch;D.E. Redmond;J.R. Taylor

  • Chronic levodopa impairs morphological development of grafted embryonic dopamine neurons

    Kathy Steece-Collier;Timothy J. Collier;Celia D. Sladek;John R. Sladek

  • Transplantation of norepinephrine neurons into aged rats improves performance of a learned task.

    Timothy J. Collier;Don M. Gash;John R. Sladek

  • Striatal dopaminergic correlates of stable parkinsonism and degree of recovery in old-world primates one year after MPTP treatment.

    J.D. Elsworth;J.R. Taylor;J.R. Sladek;T.J. Collier

  • Age-related changes in dopamine, LHRH and somatostatin in the rat hypothalamus.

    Gloria E. Hoffman;John R. Sladek

  • Monoamine distribution in primate brain V. Monoaminergic nuclei: Anatomy, pathways and local organization

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Elsworth
John D. Elsworth Yale University
Robert H. Roth
Robert H. Roth Yale University
Timothy J. Collier
Timothy J. Collier Michigan State University
D. Eugene Redmond
D. Eugene Redmond Yale University
Don M. Gash
Don M. Gash University of Kentucky
R. H. Roth
R. H. Roth Yale University
Ariel Y. Deutch
Ariel Y. Deutch Vanderbilt University
Jane R. Taylor
Jane R. Taylor Yale University
Suzanne N. Haber
Suzanne N. Haber University of Rochester Medical Center
Gloria E. Hoffman
Gloria E. Hoffman Morgan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John R. Sladek