World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
57
Citations
12107
World Ranking
2649
National Ranking
174

John E. Field publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Field sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 252 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

John E. Field D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Field sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Field was affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research contributed to multiple areas related to environmental engineering, renewable energy, sustainability, and building construction.

Their recent publications included:

  • The effects of single and double play upon listening test outcomes and cognitive processing, 2025, University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire)
  • Tracking building operational energy and carbon emissions using S-curve trajectories-a prototype tool, 2022, Building Services Engineering Research and Technology

The primary topics covered by their work were:

  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Energy Efficiency and Management
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment

Their subfields of study spanned:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Building and Construction

John E. Field collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Roderic Bunn
  • Esfand Burman
  • James P. Warne
  • Jamie Bull

Publications appeared in venues such as:

  • Building Services Engineering Research and Technology
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire)

Best Publications

  • Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies

    J.E. Field;S.M. Walley;W.G. Proud;H.T. Goldrein

  • Theoretical strength and cleavage of diamond

    R. H. Telling;C. J. Pickard;M. C. Payne;J. E. Field

  • Solid particle erosion of metals: the removal of surface material by spherical projectiles

    I. M. Hutchings;R. E. Winter;John Edwin Field

  • Hot-spot ignition mechanisms for explosives and propellants

    John Edwin Field;N. K. Bourne;S. J. P. Palmer;S. M. Walley

  • The brittle fracture of solids by liquid impact, by solid impact, and by shock

    Unknown

  • The high strain rate compressive behaviour of polycarbonate and polyvinylidene difluoride

    C.R. Siviour;S.M. Walley;W.G. Proud;J.E. Field

  • Deformation, Strengths and Strains to Failure of Polymer Bonded Explosives

    S. J. P. Palmer;John Edwin Field;J. M. Huntley

  • Shock-induced collapse of single cavities in liquids

    N. K. Bourne;J. E. Field

  • Brittle Fracture: its Study and Application

    Unknown

  • A study of the collapse of arrays of cavities

    J. P. Dear;J. E. Field

  • Ignition Mechanisms of Explosives during Mechanical Deformation

    John Edwin Field;G. M. Swallowe;S. N. Heavens

  • Quasi–static studies of the deformation and failure of β–HMX based polymer bonded explosives

    P. J. Rae;H. T. Goldrein;S. J. P. Palmer;J. E. Field

  • The effects of target compliance on liquid drop impact

    J. E. Field;J. P. Dear;J. E. Ogren

  • Studies of two-dimensional liquid-wedge impact and their relevance to liquid-drop impact problems

    John Edwin Field;M. B. Lesser;J. P. Dear

  • High‐speed photography of surface geometry effects in liquid/solid impact

    J. P. Dear;J. E. Field

  • The temperature rise at the tip of fast-moving cracks in glassy polymers

    Unknown

  • Gas compression and jet formation in cavities collapsed by a shock wave

    J. P. Dear;J. E. Field;A. J. Walton

  • The ignition of a thin layer of explosive by impact

    S. N. Heavens;John Edwin Field

  • Liquid-jet impact on liquid and solid surfaces

    T. Obara;N.K. Bourne;J.E. Field

  • Diamond polishing

    Unknown

  • The role of localized plastic flow in the impact initiation of explosives

    R. E. Winter;John Edwin Field

  • High‐speed photography of compressive failure waves in glasses

    N. K. Bourne;Z. Rosenberg;J. E. Field

  • Quasi–static studies of the deformation and failure of PBX 9501

    P. J. Rae;S. J. P. Palmer;H. T. Goldrein;J. E. Field

  • The role of rapidly compressed gas pockets in the initiation of condensed explosives

    M. M. Chaudhri;John Edwin Field

  • An Improved Method for Compressive Stress-Strain Measurements at Very High Strain Rates

    D. A. Gorham;P. H. Pope;John Edwin Field

  • Design and construction of the UK plate impact facility

    N K Bourne;Z Rosenberg;D J Johnson;J E Field

  • High strain rate properties of a polymer-bonded sugar: their dependence on applied and internal constraints

    Clive R Siviour;Peter R. Laity;William G Proud;J.E. Field

  • Cavitation in impacted drops and jets and the effect on erosion damage thresholds

    John E. Field;J.-J. Camus;Marc Tinguely;Danail Obreschkow

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Bourne
Neil Bourne University of Manchester
Jonathan M. Huntley
Jonathan M. Huntley Loughborough University
S. van der Zwaag
S. van der Zwaag Delft University of Technology
John P. Dear
John P. Dear Imperial College London
Timothy G. Leighton
Timothy G. Leighton University of Southampton
David Porter
David Porter University of Oxford
François Avellan
François Avellan École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Ian M. Hutchings
Ian M. Hutchings University of Cambridge
Michael V. Swain
Michael V. Swain University of Sydney
Colin Atkinson
Colin Atkinson Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John E. Field

Recently Published Articles