World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
55
Citations
142189
World Ranking
754
National Ranking
55

John A. Nelder publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Nelder sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 168 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John A. Nelder D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Nelder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Nelder was affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic career was characterized by involvement in areas within science and research connected to this institution.

There are no records available of recent papers published by John A. Nelder. Similarly, details concerning frequent co-authors, frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, and main topics of work have not been provided.

Information about awards won by John A. Nelder is also not present in the available data. The scientist is noted as deceased, and therefore all descriptions are presented in the past tense.

Although comprehensive data about John A. Nelder's scientific contributions and specific subject expertise is limited, the affiliation with a prominent institution such as Imperial College London suggests a connection to significant academic and research activities during their career.

Best Publications

  • A SIMPLEX METHOD FOR FUNCTION MINIMIZATION

    John A. Nelder;R. Mead

  • Generalized Linear Models

    Peter McCullagh;John Ashworth Nelder

  • Generalized Linear Models

    J. A. Nelder;R. W. M. Wedderburn

  • Generalized linear models. 2nd ed.

    Peter McCullagh;John A. Nelder

  • Generalized Linear Models

    John H. Schuenemeyer;P. McCullagh;J. A. Nelder

  • Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models

    Y. Lee;J. A. Nelder

  • Statistics In Biology.

    Unknown

  • Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: Unified Analysis via H-likelihood

    Youngjo Lee;John A. Nelder;Yudi Pawitan

  • An extended quasi-likelihood function

    J. A. Nelder;D. Pregibon

  • The Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Orthogonal Block Structure. I. Block Structure and the Null Analysis of Variance

    John Ashworth Nelder

  • Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction.

    Peter W. Lane;John A. Nelder

  • A Reformulation of Linear Models

    Unknown

  • The GLIM System, Release 3: Generalized linear interactive modelling

    Peter McCullagh;R. J. Baker;J. A. Nelder

  • The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines. Discussion. Authors' reply

    A. P. Verbyla;B. R. Cullis;M. G. Kenward;S. J. Welham

  • Statistical Analysis: A Computer Oriented Approach.

    J. A. Nelder;A. A. Afifi;S. P. Azen

  • Generalized Linear Models

    J. A. Nelder;R. J. Baker

  • Conditional and Marginal Models: Another View

    Youngjo Lee;John A. Nelder

  • Nelder-Mead algorithm

    Sasa Singer;John A. Nelder

  • Double hierarchical generalized linear models (with discussion)

    Youngjo Lee;John A. Nelder

  • Generalized linear models for the analysis of Taguchi-type experiments

    John A. Nelder;Y. Lee

  • The analysis of randomized experiments with orthogonal block structure. II. Treatment structure and the general analysis of variance

    John Ashworth Nelder

  • Likelihood, Quasi-likelihood and Pseudolikelihood: Some Comparisons

    J. A. Nelder;Y. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Youngjo Lee
Youngjo Lee Seoul National University
Peter McCullagh
Peter McCullagh University of Chicago
David R. Cox
David R. Cox University of Oxford
Raghu N. Kacker
Raghu N. Kacker National Institute of Standards and Technology
Andreas Buja
Andreas Buja University of Pennsylvania
Thomas S. Richardson
Thomas S. Richardson University of Washington
Tyler J. VanderWeele
Tyler J. VanderWeele Harvard University
Peter J. Diggle
Peter J. Diggle Lancaster University
Noel A Cressie
Noel A Cressie University of Wollongong
Brian Francis
Brian Francis Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, expanding skills through related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Degrees in finance and business are natural complements, allowing graduates to apply quantitative skills in high-demand industries.

Pursuing the cheapest masters in finance is an affordable option for those looking to enter financial analysis, risk management, or investment banking. These programs offer strong quantitative and analytical training useful for math graduates.

For aspiring business leaders, accelerated online mba programs provide a faster path to management roles, often allowing completion within a year or less. This is ideal for math professionals eager to quickly gain leadership skills.

Marketing is another promising field, where data and analytics are key. Earning a masters in marketing can enhance understanding of consumer data trends, helping graduates stand out in digital marketing and market research roles.

Additionally, many students consider one year mba programs for a balanced option between depth and speed. These programs equip math professionals to excel in business strategy and quantitative decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Nelder