World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johanna M. Jarcho

Johanna M. Jarcho

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
6913
World Ranking
10075
National Ranking
5313

Johanna M. Jarcho publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna M. Jarcho sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Johanna M. Jarcho D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johanna M. Jarcho sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Culture and social support: who seeks it and why?

    Shelley E. Taylor;David K. Sherman;Heejung S. Kim;Johanna Jarcho

  • An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals

    Matthew D Lieberman;Ahmad Hariri;Johanna M Jarcho;Naomi I Eisenberger

  • An experimental study of shared sensitivity to physical pain and social rejection

    Naomi I. Eisenberger;Johanna M. Jarcho;Matthew D. Lieberman;Bruce D. Naliboff

  • Social re-orientation and brain development: An expanded and updated view.

    Eric E. Nelson;Johanna M. Jarcho;Amanda E. Guyer

  • Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: an FMRI study.

    Matthew D. Lieberman;Johanna M. Jarcho;Ajay B. Satpute

  • The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account

    Matthew D. Lieberman;Johanna M. Jarcho;Steve M. Berman;Bruce D. Naliboff

  • The UCLA Body Project I: Gender and Ethnic Differences in Self-Objectification and Body Satisfaction Among 2,206 Undergraduates

    David A. Frederick;Gordon B. Forbes;Kristina E. Grigorian;Johanna M. Jarcho

  • The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making

    Johanna M. Jarcho;Elliot T. Berkman;Matthew D. Lieberman

  • Reduced Brainstem Inhibition during Anticipated Pelvic Visceral Pain Correlates with Enhanced Brain Response to the Visceral Stimulus in Women with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

    Steven M. Berman;Bruce D. Naliboff;Brandall Suyenobu;Jennifer S. Labus

  • Pain, affective symptoms, and cognitive deficits in patients with cerebral dopamine dysfunction.

    Johanna M. Jarcho;Emeran A. Mayer;Ziyue Karen Jiang;Natasha A. Feier

  • Stress and irritable bowel syndrome

    Johanna M. Jarcho;Emeran A. Mayer

  • ATTENTION BIAS OF ANXIOUS YOUTH DURING EXTENDED EXPOSURE OF EMOTIONAL FACE PAIRS: AN EYE-TRACKING STUDY

    Tomer Shechner;Johanna M. Jarcho;Jennifer C. Britton;Ellen Leibenluft

  • Lasting associations between early-childhood temperament and late-adolescent reward-circuitry response to peer feedback

    Amanda E. Guyer;Brenda Benson;Victoria R. Choate;Yair Bar-Haim

  • FEAR CONDITIONING AND EXTINCTION IN ANXIOUS AND NONANXIOUS YOUTH AND ADULTS: EXAMINING A NOVEL DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE FEAR-CONDITIONING TASK

    Tomer Shechner;Jennifer C. Britton;G B A Emily Ronkin;Johanna M. Jarcho

  • Sex differences in emotion-related cognitive processes in irritable bowel syndrome and healthy control subjects.

    Jennifer S. Labus;Arpana Gupta;Kristen Coveleskie;Kirsten Tillisch

  • Temperament and Parenting Styles in Early Childhood Differentially Influence Neural Response to Peer Evaluation in Adolescence

    Amanda E. Guyer;Johanna M. Jarcho;Koraly Pérez-Edgar;Kathryn A. Degnan

  • Attributional Inference Across Cultures: Similar Automatic Attributions and Different Controlled Corrections

    Matthew D. Lieberman;Johanna M. Jarcho;Junko Obayashi

  • Discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and parent-child agreement on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in treatment- and non-treatment-seeking youth

    B.I. Rappaport;D. Pagliaccio;D.S. Pine;D.N. Klein

  • The neural correlates of emotion-based cognitive control in adults with early childhood behavioral inhibition

    Johanna M. Jarcho;Nathan A. Fox;Daniel S. Pine;Amit Etkin;Amit Etkin

  • Forgetting the best when predicting the worst: Preliminary observations on neural circuit function in adolescent social anxiety.

    Johanna M. Jarcho;Adrienne L. Romer;Tomer Shechner;Adriana Galvan

Frequent Co-Authors

Emeran A. Mayer
Emeran A. Mayer University of California, Los Angeles
Bruce D. Naliboff
Bruce D. Naliboff University of California, Los Angeles
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Eric E. Nelson
Eric E. Nelson The Ohio State University
Jennifer S. Labus
Jennifer S. Labus University of California, Los Angeles
Matthew D. Lieberman
Matthew D. Lieberman University of California, Los Angeles
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Amanda E. Guyer
Amanda E. Guyer University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Johanna M. Jarcho

Recently Published Articles