World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
5157
World Ranking
8823
National Ranking
741

Joachim Röschke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Röschke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joachim Röschke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Röschke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Röschke is affiliated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz in Germany. Their academic and research profile is characterized by professional engagement within this institution.

No detailed information regarding recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues is available in the current data. Consequently, there is no specific insight into the thematic focus of their research publications or collaborative networks.

The record does not include data on book publications or the researcher's primary and subfields of study, which limits the ability to outline their academic specializations or areas of expertise further.

Similarly, no details on main topics of work or research themes were provided, so it is not possible to enumerate any particular scientific topics the researcher concentrates on.

There is no information available about awards or honors received by Joachim Röschke.

This profile is based exclusively on the available data, which describes Joachim Röschke as an active scientist associated with Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz without further elaboration on specific research contributions or academic achievements.

Best Publications

  • Discrimination of sleep stages: a comparison between spectral and nonlinear EEG measures

    Jürgen Fell;Joachim Röschke;Klaus Mann;Cornelius Schäffner

  • Effects of pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human sleep.

    Klaus Mann;Joachim Röschke

  • Interrater reliability between scorers from eight European sleep laboratories in subjects with different sleep disorders.

    Heidi Danker-Hopfe;D. Kunz;G. Gruber;G. Klösch

  • The SIESTA project polygraphic and clinical database

    G. Klosh;B. Kemp;T. Penzel;A. Schlogl

  • Human sleep under the influence of pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A polysomnographic study using standardized conditions

    P. Wagner;J. Röschke;K. Mann;W. Hiller

  • The benefit from whole body acupuncture in major depression.

    J. Röschke;Ch. Wolf;M.J. Müller;P. Wagner

  • No short-term effects of digital mobile radio telephone on the awake human electroencephalogram.

    Joachim Röschke;Klaus Mann

  • Maintenance cognitive-behavioral therapy and manualized psychoeducation in the treatment of recurrent depression: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial

    Ulrich Stangier;Christine Hilling;Thomas Heidenreich;Anne Katrin Risch

  • The dimensionality of human's electroencephalogram during sleep

    J. Röschke;J. Aldenhoff

  • Effects of Pulsed High-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on the Neuroendocrine System

    Klaus Mann;Peter Wagner;Georg Brunn;Feisal Hassan

  • Deterministic chaos and the first positive Lyapunov exponent: a nonlinear analysis of the human electroencephalogram during sleep

    J. Fell;J. Röschke;P. Beckmann

  • The EEG is a Quasi-Deterministic Signal Anticipating Sensory-Cognitive Tasks

    E. Başar;C. Başar-Eroglu;J. Röschke;A. Schütt

  • Increased bioavailability of oral melatonin after fluvoxamine coadministration.

    Sebastian Härtter;Michael Grözinger;Harald Weigmann;Joachim Röschke

  • Nonlinear analysis of sleep EEG data in schizophrenia: calculation of the principal Lyapunov exponent

    Joachim Röschke;Jürgen Fell;Peter Beckmann

  • Human sleep EEG under the influence of pulsed radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Results from polysomnographies using submaximal high power flux densities.

    Peter Wagner;Joachim Röschke;Klaus Mann;Jürgen Fell

  • EEG analysis with nonlinear deterministic and stochastic methods: a combined strategy.

    Juergen Fell;A. Kaplan;B. Darkhovsky;J. Röschke

  • The calculation of the first positive Lyapunov exponent in sleep EEG data.

    J. Röschke;J. Fell;P. Beckmann

  • A nonlinear approach to brain function: deterministic chaos and sleep EEG.

    Unknown

  • A confirmatory study on the mechanisms behind reduced P300 waves in depression.

    Joachim Röschke;Peter Wagner

  • Surrogate data analysis of sleep electroencephalograms reveals evidence for nonlinearity

    Jürgen Fell;Joachim Röschke;Cornelius Schäffner

  • Percentile reference charts for selected sleep parameters for 20- to 80-year-old healthy subjects from the SIESTA database

    Heidi Danker-Hopfe;Michael Schäfer;Hans Dorn;Peter Anderer

  • Subchronic effects of olanzapine on sleep EEG in schizophrenic patients with predominantly negative symptoms.

    M J Müller;W Rossbach;K Mann;J Röschke

Frequent Co-Authors

Otto Benkert
Otto Benkert Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Dieter Kunz
Dieter Kunz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Alois Schlögl
Alois Schlögl Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Ralf G.M. Schlösser
Ralf G.M. Schlösser Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Peter Rappelsberger
Peter Rappelsberger University of Vienna
Josef Zeitlhofer
Josef Zeitlhofer Medical University of Vienna
Klaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Peter Anderer
Peter Anderer Philips (Finland)
Ralf W. Dittmann
Ralf W. Dittmann Heidelberg University
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to mean studying on campus. Many top universities now offer an online bachelor's degree in neuroscience or closely related fields, allowing for flexible and accelerated paths to graduation. This can be especially appealing for students looking to balance studies with work or family commitments.

If you’re thinking beyond undergraduate study, having a degree in neuroscience can serve as a strong foundation for entering some of the best bachelor degrees and later, some of the highest paying majors. Graduates can pursue careers in medical research, pharmaceuticals, psychology, data analysis, or move on to graduate programs in medicine or allied health sciences.

Affordability is also a key consideration for many students. Fortunately, there are several online colleges that take financial aid, making it possible to access quality neuroscience education without overwhelming debt. Researching your best fit in terms of both academic focus and financial support is crucial for long-term success.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Röschke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles