World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7066
World Ranking
8423
National Ranking
121

Javier Galbally publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Galbally sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Javier Galbally D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Galbally sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Javier Galbally is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Madrid in Spain. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Safety Research, and Information Systems. Their work spans across topics related to Biometric Identification and Security, Face Recognition and Analysis, Face and Expression Recognition, Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods, Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Topic Modeling.

The scientist has contributed to multiple papers, some of the notable recent publications include:

  • "Biometric Quality: Review and Application to Face Recognition with FaceQnet" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "SVC-onGoing: Signature verification competition" (2022), published in Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
  • "Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Survey" (2022), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "3D-FLARE: A Touchless Full-3D Fingerprint Recognition System Based on Laser Sensing" (2020), published in IEEE Access
  • "A new Foe in biometrics: A narrative review of side-channel attacks" (2020), published in Computers & Security

Javier Galbally has coauthored works frequently with several researchers, which include:

  • Julián Fiérrez
  • Aythami Morales
  • Javier Ortega-García
  • Marta Gomez-Barrero
  • Javier Hernandez-Ortega

Their publications have appeared mainly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Biblos-e Archivo (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • IEEE Access
  • Computers & Security

Best Publications

  • Image Quality Assessment for Fake Biometric Detection: Application to Iris, Fingerprint, and Face Recognition

    Javier Galbally;Sebastien Marcel;Julian Fierrez

  • Biometric Antispoofing Methods: A Survey in Face Recognition

    Javier Galbally;Sebastien Marcel;Julian Fierrez

  • The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB)

    Javier Ortega-Garcia;Julian Fierrez;Fernando Alonso-Fernandez;Javier Galbally

  • A high performance fingerprint liveness detection method based on quality related features

    Javier Galbally;Fernando Alonso-Fernandez;Julian Fierrez;Javier Ortega-Garcia

  • General Framework to Evaluate Unlinkability in Biometric Template Protection Systems

    Marta Gomez-Barrero;Javier Galbally;Christian Rathgeb;Christoph Busch

  • Face Anti-spoofing Based on General Image Quality Assessment

    Javier Galbally;Sébastien Marcel

  • BiosecurID: a multimodal biometric database

    J. Fierrez;J. Galbally;J. Ortega-Garcia;M. R. Freire

  • Multi-biometric template protection based on Homomorphic Encryption

    Marta Gomez-Barrero;Emanuele Maiorana;Javier Galbally;Patrizio Campisi

  • On the vulnerability of face verification systems to hill-climbing attacks

    Javier Galbally;Chris McCool;Julian Fierrez;Sebastien Marcel

  • Iris liveness detection based on quality related features

    Javier Galbally;Jaime Ortiz-Lopez;Julian Fierrez;Javier Ortega-Garcia

  • Iris image reconstruction from binary templates: An efficient probabilistic approach based on genetic algorithms

    Javier Galbally;Arun Ross;Marta Gomez-Barrero;Julian Fierrez

  • Direct Attacks Using Fake Images in Iris Verification

    Virginia Ruiz-Albacete;Pedro Tome-Gonzalez;Fernando Alonso-Fernandez;Javier Galbally

  • On-line signature recognition through the combination of real dynamic data and synthetically generated static data

    Javier Galbally;Moises Diaz-Cabrera;Miguel A. Ferrer;Marta Gomez-Barrero

  • FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learning

    Javier Hernandez-Ortega;Javier Galbally;Julian Fierrez;Rudolf Haraksim

  • Multi-biometric template protection based on bloom filters

    Marta Gomez-Barrero;Christian Rathgeb;Guoqiang Li;Raghavendra Ramachandra

  • Unlinkable and irreversible biometric template protection based on bloom filters

    Marta Gomez-Barrero;Christian Rathgeb;Javier Galbally;Christoph Busch

  • An evaluation of direct attacks using fake fingers generated from ISO templates

    Javier Galbally;Raffaele Cappelli;Alessandra Lumini;Guillermo Gonzalez-de-Rivera

  • Evaluation of direct attacks to fingerprint verification systems

    J. Galbally;J. Fierrez;F. Alonso-Fernandez;M. Martinez-Diaz

  • The 2nd competition on counter measures to 2D face spoofing attacks

    I. Chingovska;J. Yang;Z. Lei;D. Yi

  • Benchmarking Touchscreen Biometrics for Mobile Authentication

    Julian Fierrez;Ada Pozo;Marcos Martinez-Diaz;Javier Galbally

  • Synthetic on-line signature generation. Part I: Methodology and algorithms

    Javier Galbally;Réjean Plamondon;Julian Fierrez;Javier Ortega-Garcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Julian Fierrez
Julian Fierrez Autonomous University of Madrid
Javier Ortega-Garcia
Javier Ortega-Garcia Autonomous University of Madrid
Aythami Morales
Aythami Morales Autonomous University of Madrid
Fernando Alonso-Fernandez
Fernando Alonso-Fernandez Halmstad University
Miguel Ferrer
Miguel Ferrer University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Christoph Busch
Christoph Busch Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Réjean Plamondon
Réjean Plamondon Polytechnique Montréal
Sébastien Marcel
Sébastien Marcel Idiap Research Institute
Christian Rathgeb
Christian Rathgeb Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences
Arun Ross
Arun Ross Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to many affordable and flexible education options in the USA. If you’re looking for a fast track into tech, consider enrolling in the best associate degree in 6 months online. These accelerated programs help you start your career quickly while building essential technical skills.

For those interested in business technology or management, several top business schools online offer degrees that combine business fundamentals with digital skills—perfect for future tech leaders and entrepreneurs.

Cost is always a major consideration. Prospective students should explore cheap online universities that provide quality computer science and related degrees at a fraction of the price.

If you’re interested in technology’s applied side, look into the cheapest engineering degree online programs. These can open doors to careers in fields like software engineering, robotics, and data systems.

With so many flexible pathways, you can match your education to your budget and career goals, all from home.

Best Scientists Citing Javier Galbally

Trending Scientists