World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
9981
World Ranking
1448
National Ranking
14

Jan Verwer publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Verwer sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 149 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jan Verwer D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Verwer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Verwer was a researcher affiliated with the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica in the Netherlands. Their academic work was connected primarily to this institution, where they were involved in mathematical and computational research.

Throughout their career, Jan Verwer did not have publicly listed recent papers or a recorded body of published research articles. Likewise, no frequent co-authors or common publication venues were documented for their work.

The scientist's main fields of study were not enumerated in the available data, nor were there specific subfields or recurring topics associated with their research contributions.

No book publications or publishing houses were recorded under their name, and there were no awards or honors noted during or after their career.

Jan Verwer is confirmed to be deceased. This overview reflects their professional profile based solely on available data points without additional inferred information.

Best Publications

  • Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Equations

    Willem Hundsdorfer;Jan Verwer

  • Stability of Runge-Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differential Equations

    Unknown

  • Benchmarking stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems II: Rosenbrock solvers

    A. Sandu;Jan Verwer;Joke Blom;E.J. Spee

  • A positive finite-difference advection scheme

    W. Hundsdorfer;B. Koren;M. van Loon;J. G. Verwer

  • A Second-Order Rosenbrock Method Applied to Photochemical Dispersion Problems

    J. G. Verwer;E. J. Spee;J. G. Blom;W. Hundsdorfer

  • Gauss-Seidel iteration for stiff odes from chemical kinetics

    J. G. Verwer

  • Analysis of operator splitting for advection-diffusion-reaction problems from air pollution modelling

    D. Lanser;J. G. Verwer

  • RKC: an explicit solver for parabolic PDEs

    B. P. Sommeijer;L. F. Shampine;J. G. Verwer

  • On the stability of implicit-explicit linear multistep methods

    J. Frank;W. Hundsdorfer;J. G. Verwer

  • Benchmarking stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems-I. implicit vs explicit

    A. Sandu;J.G. Verwer;M. Van Loon;G.R. Carmichael

  • Convergence properties of the Runge-Kutta-Chebyshev method

    J. G. Verwer;W. H. Hundsdorfer;B. P. Sommeijer

  • Explicit Runge-Kutta methods for parabolic partial differential equations

    Unknown

  • A multirate time stepping strategy for stiff ordinary differential equations

    Valeriu Savcenco;Willem Hundsdorfer;Jan Verwer

  • RKC time-stepping for advection-diffusion-reaction problems

    J. G. Verwer;B. P. Sommeijer;W. Hundsdorfer

  • Convergence and order reduction of Runge-Kutta schemes applied to evolutionary problems in partial differential equations

    J. M. Sanz-Serna;J. G. Verwer;W. H. Hundsdorfer

  • A numerical study of three moving-grid methods for one-dimensional partial differential equations which are based on the method of lines

    R. M. Furzeland;J. G. Verwer;P. A. Zegeling

  • ROS3P : an accurate third-order Rosenbrock solver designed for parabolic problems

    J. Lang;J.G. Verwer

  • Conerservative and Nonconservative Schemes for the Solution of the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

    Unknown

  • An implicit-explicit approach for atmospheric transport-chemistry problems

    J. G. Verwer;J. G. Blom;W. Hundsdorfer

  • Convergence of method of lines approximations to partial differential equations

    J. G. Verwer;J. M. Sanz-Serna

  • A comparison of stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems

    Jan Verwer;Joke Blom;van M. Loon;E.J. Spee

  • Stability of implicit-explicit linear multistep methods

    Jason Frank;Willem Hundsdorfer;Jan Verwer

  • Benchmarking Stiff ODE Solvers for Atmospheric Chemistry Problems I: Implicit versus Explicit

    A. Sandu;J.G. Verwer;M. van Loon;G.R. Carmichael

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem Hundsdorfer
Willem Hundsdorfer Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Jesús María Sanz-Serna
Jesús María Sanz-Serna Carlos III University of Madrid
Adrian Sandu
Adrian Sandu Virginia Tech
Lawrence F. Shampine
Lawrence F. Shampine Southern Methodist University
Florian A. Potra
Florian A. Potra University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Wouter Peters
Wouter Peters Wageningen University & Research
David Simpson
David Simpson Chalmers University of Technology
Donald Dabdub
Donald Dabdub University of California, Irvine
Maarten Krol
Maarten Krol Wageningen University & Research
John H. Seinfeld
John H. Seinfeld California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens the door to various related online degree programs that can enhance career opportunities. For example, pursuing a data analytics master's degree is a natural extension, given the strong analytical and statistical skills gained through mathematics studies.

For professionals interested in combining mathematical expertise with leadership and business acumen, exploring an easiest mba program to get into can be a practical step. These programs provide accessible pathways to develop management skills without compromising academic rigor.

Additionally, online options such as the easiest online mba program offer flexibility for working professionals aiming to balance education and career growth, making them an attractive choice for math graduates seeking versatile qualifications.

For those focused on leadership within academia or industry, enrolling in a best 1 year dba program online can accelerate advancement. These programs concentrate on developing strategic decision-making skills, complementing a strong quantitative background.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Verwer

Recently Published Articles