World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9464 8847 5014 4569 64 6272

James Poling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James Poling between 1997 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Poling published across 26 years, from 1997 to 2022, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2005. 2 of the 70 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2005. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications
1997 2022

70 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James Poling: publications per year, 1997 to 2022
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 0
2003 7
2004 4
2005 10
2006 4
2007 6
2008 3
2009 8
2010 10
2011 5
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
Total 70
Download as CSV

James Poling publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Poling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 64
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

James Poling D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Poling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James Poling is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and works primarily within the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics covered in James Poling's work include:

  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Neurological and metabolic disorders
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis

Recent publications by James Poling include:

  • Modafinil does not reduce cocaine use in methadone-maintained individuals, 2022, published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • 1524: THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ELEVATION AND TRAUMATIC AORTIC INJURIES, 2021, published in Critical Care Medicine
  • Does altitude increase the risk of traumatic aortic injuries? A retrospective cohort study among six level I trauma centers in the United States, 2022, published in Patient Safety in Surgery

Frequent co-authors of James Poling include:

  • Stephanie Jarvis
  • Patrick D. Rudersdorf
  • Kristin Salottolo
  • Allen Tanner
  • Wendy Erickson

James Poling has published in several well-known scientific venues, notably:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Patient Safety in Surgery

Best Publications

  • The Effect of Cannabis Compared with Alcohol on Driving

    R. Andrew Sewell;James Poling;Mehmet Sofuoglu

  • Interaction of FKBP5 with childhood adversity on risk for post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Pingxing Xie;Henry R Kranzler;James Poling;Murray B Stein

  • Cocaine Vaccine for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence in Methadone-Maintained Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy Trial

    Bridget A. Martell;Frank M. Orson;James Poling;Ellen Mitchell

  • Adverse childhood events as risk factors for substance dependence: partial mediation by mood and anxiety disorders

    Kara R. Douglas;Grace Chan;Joel Gelernter;Albert J. Arias

  • Interactive effect of stressful life events and the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR genotype on posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis in 2 independent populations.

    Pingxing Xie;Henry R. Kranzler;James Poling;Murray B. Stein

  • Personality, temperament, and character dimensions and the DSM-IV personality disorders in substance abusers.

    Samuel A. Ball;Howard Tennen;James C. Poling;Henry R. Kranzler

  • Vaccine pharmacotherapy for the treatment of cocaine dependence.

    Bridget A. Martell;Ellen Mitchell;James Poling;Kishor Gonsai

  • Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients.

    Kevin P Conway;Robert J Kane;Samuel A Ball;James C Poling

  • Six-Month Trial of Bupropion With Contingency Management for Cocaine Dependence in a Methadone-Maintained Population

    James Poling;Alison Oliveto;Nancy Petry;Mehmet Sofuoglu

  • Naltrexone and disulfiram in patients with alcohol dependence and comorbid psychiatric disorders.

    Ismene L. Petrakis;James Poling;Carolyn Levinson;Charla Nich

  • Personality disorders in substance abusers: relation to substance use.

    Bruce J. Rounsaville;Henry R. Kranzler;Samuel Ball;Howard Tennen

  • Naltrexone and disulfiram in patients with alcohol dependence and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Ismene L. Petrakis;James Poling;Carolyn Levinson;Charla Nich

  • Treatment outcome predictors for cocaine dependence.

    James Poling;Thomas R. Kosten;Mehmet Sofuoglu

  • Naltrexone augmentation of neuroleptic treatment in alcohol abusing patients with schizophrenia

    Ismene L. Petrakis;Ismene L. Petrakis;Stephanie O’Malley;Bruce Rounsaville;James Poling

  • Genomewide linkage scan for cocaine dependence and related traits: significant linkages for a cocaine-related trait and cocaine-induced paranoia.

    Joel Gelernter;Carolien Panhuysen;Roger Weiss;Kathleen Brady

  • Desipramine and contingency management for cocaine and opiate dependence in buprenorphine maintained patients

    Thomas Kosten;Alison Oliveto;Alan Feingold;James Poling

  • Variation in Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Genes is Associated with Multiple Substance Dependence Phenotypes

    Richard Sherva;Henry R Kranzler;Yi Yu;Mark W Logue

  • d-Cycloserine attenuates reactivity to smoking cues in nicotine dependent smokers: A pilot investigation

    Elizabeth J. Santa Ana;Bruce J. Rounsaville;Tami L. Frankforter;Charla Nich

  • Axis I and Axis II disorders in alcoholics and drug addicts: fact or artifact?

    R Verheul;H R Kranzler;J Poling;H Tennen

  • Personality Disorder and Dimension Differences Between Type A and Type B Substance Abusers

    Samuel A. Ball;Henry R. Kranzler;Howard Tennen;James C. Poling

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas R. Kosten
Thomas R. Kosten Baylor College of Medicine
Henry R. Kranzler
Henry R. Kranzler University of Pennsylvania
Joel Gelernter
Joel Gelernter Yale University
Bruce J. Rounsaville
Bruce J. Rounsaville Yale University
Roger D. Weiss
Roger D. Weiss Harvard University
Lindsay A. Farrer
Lindsay A. Farrer Boston University
Kathleen M. Carroll
Kathleen M. Carroll Yale University
Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina
Howard Tennen
Howard Tennen University of Connecticut
Samuel A. Ball
Samuel A. Ball Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens several rewarding career pathways. Many students consider roles like school counselor or social worker after earning a psychology degree. Requirements to become a professional in these fields can vary greatly by state.

For instance, if you are interested in providing guidance to students, you will need to meet the requirements to be a school counselor in Wisconsin or the requirements to be a school counselor in Wyoming. Each state outlines specific educational qualifications, exams, and licensure standards.

If social work is your preferred career, it's important to know the state-specific requirements. For example, you can review the Alabama minimum degree requirement for social workers or the Alaska minimum degree requirement for social workers. Most social work and counseling positions require at least a bachelor’s degree, while some require a graduate-level education.

Online psychology and social work degrees offer flexibility for students balancing work or family. Understanding state regulations will help you choose the right educational path for your desired career.

Best Scientists Citing James Poling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles