World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
65
Citations
16340
World Ranking
1521
National Ranking
498

James D. Weiland publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Weiland sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 318 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

James D. Weiland D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Weiland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the design, development, and realization of retinal prostheses
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

James D. Weiland is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Engineering, with a focus on subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their scientific contributions cover topics including Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Advanced Memory and Neural Computing, Neural dynamics and brain function, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, and Retinal Development and Disorders.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Ultra-small carbon fiber electrode recording site optimization and improved in vivo chronic recording yield, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Carbon fiber electrodes for intracellular recording and stimulation, 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Electrodeposited Platinum Iridium Enables Microstimulation With Carbon Fiber Electrodes, 2021, Frontiers in Nanotechnology
  • A Patient-Specific Computational Framework for the Argus II Implant, 2020, IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology
  • Compositional and morphological properties of platinum-iridium electrodeposited on carbon fiber microelectrodes, 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Elena della Valle
  • Cynthia A. Chestek
  • Paras R. Patel
  • Julianna M. Richie
  • Beomseo Koo

James D. Weiland has been recognized with awards such as:

  • IEEE Fellow (2017) for contributions to the design, development, and realization of retinal prostheses
  • Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) (2015)

Best Publications

  • Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis

    Mark S. Humayun;James D. Weiland;Gildo Y. Fujii;Robert Greenberg

  • Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina

    Mark S. Humayun;Eugene de Juan;James D. Weiland;Gislin Dagnelie

  • Retinal Prosthesis for the Blind

    Eyal Margalit;Mauricio Maia;James D Weiland;Robert J Greenberg

  • A neuro-stimulus chip with telemetry unit for retinal prosthetic device

    W. Liu;K. Vichienchom;M. Clements;S.C. DeMarco

  • In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes

    J.D. Weiland;D.J. Anderson;M.S. Humayun

  • Flexible parylene-based multielectrode array technology for high-density neural stimulation and recording

    Damien C. Rodger;Damien C. Rodger;Andy J. Fong;Wen Li;Hossein Ameri

  • Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes

    J.D. Weiland;D.J. Anderson

  • An Integrated 256-Channel Epiretinal Prosthesis

    Kuanfu Chen;Zhi Yang;Linh Hoang;J Weiland

  • Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa.

    Douglas Yanai;Douglas Yanai;James D. Weiland;Manjunatha Mahadevappa;Robert J. Greenberg

  • Retinal stimulation strategies to restore vision: Fundamentals and systems

    Lan Yue;James D. Weiland;Botond Roska;Mark S. Humayun

  • Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis.

    Gerald J Chader;James Weiland;Mark S Humayun

  • An optimal design methodology for inductive power link with class-E amplifier

    G.A. Kendir;Wentai Liu;Guoxing Wang;M. Sivaprakasam

  • Visual Prosthesis

    Unknown

  • Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs.

    Ajit B. Majji;Mark S. Humayun;James D. Weiland;Satoshi Suzuki

  • Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects

    M. Mahadevappa;J.D. Weiland;D. Yanai;I. Fine

  • Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses.

    Chloé de Balthasar;Sweta Patel;Arup Roy;Ricardo Freda

  • A variable range bi-phasic current stimulus driver circuitry for an implantable retinal prosthetic device

    M. Sivaprakasam;Wentai Liu;M.S. Humayun;J.D. Weiland

  • An update on retinal prostheses.

    Lauren N. Ayton;Nick Barnes;Nick Barnes;Gislin Dagnelie;Takashi Fujikado

  • Visually Guided Performance of Simple Tasks Using Simulated Prosthetic Vision

    Jasmine S. Hayes;Vivian T. Yin;Duke Piyathaisere;James D. Weiland

  • Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

    Devyani Nanduri;Ione Fine;Alan Horsager;Geoffrey M. Boynton

  • Materials and Fractal Designs for 3D Multifunctional Integumentary Membranes with Capabilities in Cardiac Electrotherapy

    Lizhi Xu;Sarah R. Gutbrod;Yinji Ma;Yinji Ma;Artin Petrossians

  • In vitro and in vivo evaluation of ultrananocrystalline diamond for coating of implantable retinal microchips

    Xingcheng Xiao;Jian Wang;Chao Liu;John A. Carlisle

  • Retinal Prosthesis

    James D. Weiland;Mark S. Humayun

  • Robot vision for the visually impaired

    Vivek Pradeep;Gerard Medioni;James Weiland

  • Retinal prosthesis.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Humayun
Mark S. Humayun University of Southern California
Robert J. Greenberg
Robert J. Greenberg Johns Hopkins University
Wentai Liu
Wentai Liu University of California, Los Angeles
Yu-Chong Tai
Yu-Chong Tai California Institute of Technology
Gerard Medioni
Gerard Medioni Amazon (United States)
Florian Mansfeld
Florian Mansfeld University of Southern California
Ellis Meng
Ellis Meng University of Southern California
Geoffrey M. Boynton
Geoffrey M. Boynton University of Washington
Laurent Itti
Laurent Itti University of Southern California
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James D. Weiland

Trending Scientists